pic from new 100-400 L
Author
Discussion

poah

Original Poster:

2,142 posts

258 months

Friday 21st April 2006
quotequote all
ordered yesterday from ajpurdy arrived this morning.







>> Edited by poah on Friday 21st April 12:02

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Friday 21st April 2006
quotequote all
poah said:
ordered yesterday from ajpurdy arrived this morning.



AJPurdy seems to be the dealer of choice for PH'ers at the moment. They had a kidney off me last week, thanks to Mad Dave mentioning they had my camera in stock.

monkeyhanger

9,267 posts

272 months

Friday 21st April 2006
quotequote all
If its good at 400mm f5.6 it'll be excellent anywhere else in the range.

Yours certainly seems to fall into that category

Andy M

3,755 posts

289 months

Friday 21st April 2006
quotequote all
Will be interested to know if you suffer increased dust on the mirror/sensor.

poah

Original Poster:

2,142 posts

258 months

Friday 21st April 2006
quotequote all
there is movement of air when you move the barrel but thats only going to blow dust around thats already in the chamber. I think the main problem is that you generate more force with the push pull. my sensor gets lots of dust any way so not really going to see a difference lol

SDK

3,591 posts

283 months

Saturday 22nd April 2006
quotequote all
Andy M said:
Will be interested to know if you suffer increased dust on the mirror/sensor.


Like poah said; the chamber that attaches to the camera is sealed, dust sucking from the 100-400L IS is just another internet whisper !!