Raw, tiff, jpg? How do you store.
Raw, tiff, jpg? How do you store.
Author
Discussion

mr noble

Original Poster:

6,538 posts

263 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
Took about 500 shots at a mates wedding at the weekend.

Have got them down to about 200.


The NEF (nikon raw format) shots are about 5 megs each. I have used Raw shooter esentials to go through them and adjust the exposure and have then changed them all into Tiff files and have them all on my hard drive now.

I understand that keeping them as Tiffs is best as there is no compression etc. However they are now all 35 meg files and my computer takes about 4 minutes just to open all their thumbnails up in windows!

Is this the best and only reccommended format to keep them in? SShould I just burn them all onto DVDs and give them to my mate?

Thanks
Greg

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
I keep all mine in RAW, then convert them to jpeg as required - I usually keep a copy of the best ones in a Rawshooter converted JPEG as well. The RAW file is the daddy, everything else is losing something, so keep your RAWs!

beano500

20,854 posts

305 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
Keep your RAWs either on DVD (which I have done up until now) or on a second hard drive (whcih I've just purchased - 250Gb* for under a ton). neither is completely foolproof, but they are your "digital negative" and as you develop your RAWshooter/Photoshoppe skills you can come back and do more to them.




*250Gb must be about 250 x 170 RAW files ... that's something over 42,000 shots.....

mr noble

Original Poster:

6,538 posts

263 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
Question.......


If the raw is the daddy with "all" the info and the tiff has "lost something" why is it that the tiff file is 7 times bigger than the raw file?

Also, I have to convert the raw's into tiffs in order to work on them in PS (no?)

Do you save the artworked shots (post PS) as jpg's then? (the ones you print from?

Greg

V6GTO

11,579 posts

272 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
Greg...in "batch convert" in Rawshooter, you can change the setting to convert to jpeg, and any size you like.

I convert to 750 px wide jpeg so I've got easy to open thumbnails, and then you can go back to Rawshooter at any time to do a proper job of anything you want to print/burn to CD, and delete it when the job is finished so it doesn't clog up disk space.

Martin.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
Not sure why the Tiff is bigger - that's just down to the different encoding method used.

Put it this way - if you are converting FROM raw TO tiff - the tiff can't be adding something that isn't there - so at best it's the exactly the same, but uses more disk space.

Add to that the fact you can't adjust exposure/contrast/highlights in a tiff the way you can a raw file....

mr noble

Original Poster:

6,538 posts

263 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
Martin, I couldn't work out how to fully batch convert. If you go along and "flag" each shot and delete the rubbish ones (or hit number 1, 2 , 3 etc) then when you hit the batch convert button on the top, it still only converts the image your looking at at the time.

Very odd.


Dobbo, it is odd isn't it, that the NEF has more use and info but is 7 times smaller than a tiff.

So do you open the NEF raw's in photoshop and artwork them and then resave as a raw again? What do you re-save themm as once artworked and tweaked?

G

V6GTO

11,579 posts

272 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
mr noble said:
What do you re-save themm as once artworked and tweaked?

G


Once you've played with them, converted to jpeg or tiff, turned RS off then return to it...you'll see all the sliders in the same place as you left them. They are, as are all digital images, not in a permanent state.

M.

mr noble

Original Poster:

6,538 posts

263 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
Did you upgrade to the full RS pack? I guess being able to crop from within it would be nice.

G

Bee_Jay

2,599 posts

278 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
mr noble said:
Martin, I couldn't work out how to fully batch convert. If you go along and "flag" each shot and delete the rubbish ones (or hit number 1, 2 , 3 etc) then when you hit the batch convert button on the top, it still only converts the image your looking at at the time.

Very odd.


Dobbo, it is odd isn't it, that the NEF has more use and info but is 7 times smaller than a tiff.

So do you open the NEF raw's in photoshop and artwork them and then resave as a raw again? What do you re-save themm as once artworked and tweaked?

G


Batch convert is simple. My process is to categorise them, then if I want to convert all the 1's then select the 1 tab, hit 'ctrl-a' to select all the 1's and then hit add.

beano500

20,854 posts

305 months

Monday 24th July 2006
quotequote all
One thing I don't use (much) with RAWshooter is the ability to copy the image a number of times and do tweaks to different copies. It's quite a neat idea, in fact I don't know why I don't use it more.

I know I should know the answer to this... ... but does RAWshooter hold these when you close down for next time? I sort of assume it does on the basis that it saves a file in tandem with the image for all the tweakery-pokery.

Imperialism2024

1,596 posts

286 months

Tuesday 25th July 2006
quotequote all
I'm still trying to get my head around how TIFF files are so much larger than lossless RAW files...

robdickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Tuesday 25th July 2006
quotequote all
Imperialism2024 said:
I'm still trying to get my head around how TIFF files are so much larger than lossless RAW files...


because TIFF has 16-32bits per pixel and isnt compressed.

RAW is compressed and 12bit.

Imperialism2024

1,596 posts

286 months

Tuesday 25th July 2006
quotequote all
robdickinson said:
Imperialism2024 said:
I'm still trying to get my head around how TIFF files are so much larger than lossless RAW files...


because TIFF has 16-32bits per pixel and isnt compressed.

RAW is compressed and 12bit.


So.. RAW is compressed yet lossless?

robdickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Tuesday 25th July 2006
quotequote all
Imperialism2024 said:

So.. RAW is compressed yet lossless?


Each cameras RAW format is different (even between cameras from the same brand), but it does tend to be compressed, and lossless, and yes you can do them both at the same time, PNG is compressed/lossles too...

Edited by robdickinson on Tuesday 25th July 02:36

-DeaDLocK-

3,368 posts

281 months

Tuesday 25th July 2006
quotequote all
Most modern RAW formats use lossless compresion (much like a ZIP file).

JPGs use lossy compression (much like an MP3 file).

TIFFs are uncompressed (much like a BMP file).

I personally do all my work in Photoshop, and save my finished output in Photoshop format, which uses quite efficient losless compression. Doesn't make the file easily distributable to anyone without Photoshop, but I never send anyone the full-res versions anyway.

And I personally can't tell a difference between 16 and 32 bit versions of the RAW images that my camera produces, so I just stick with 16.

Edited by -DeaDLocK- on Tuesday 25th July 02:21

jwyatt

570 posts

251 months

Friday 28th July 2006
quotequote all
This is a good question - there must be plenty of people like me who got into photography then ended up with loads of differen formats and a lot of head-scratching as to how to save it all!

I've got scans from negative or slide, which I used until I got the 20D, some digital shots from a compact, a lot of shots from the 20D and some scans of prints where I can't find the negs. I must admit that I tend now to save them all as JPEG's at quality 10 in Photoshop at what equates to about 300dpi at A4 size - pretty much exactly what the 20D and my slide scanner churn out. I only save the RAW files for shots that were particularly good, part of photography is the discipline to know what is good and what isn't and I don't want to save a lifetime of clutter as I'll never find anything! So while I might import and edit the RAW files, or 35MB psp files for the slide scanner, when I'm happy with the shot I save it as a JPEG only now, and only keep a few RAW's.

I store files under the device used to capture them and a year/month format, but also separately store all of what I consider to be my best shots as quality 10 JPEG's at full size, and also as 950 wide quality 5 JPEG's for web use. This is the folder I'm most careful aboujt backing up, and the DVD I'd grab if the house was burning down!

andybuk99

312 posts

259 months

Friday 28th July 2006
quotequote all
if you are serious about your shots and spend time processing etc store raw and the psd/tiff etc, at the end of the day £ per mb hard drive storage is dirt cheap compared to your time (at least mine anyway) to convert them again. i have 2x250gb external firewire drives in icyboxes they are backed up from one another daily and as they fill up i replace them, simple.

imperialism2024

1,596 posts

286 months

Friday 28th July 2006
quotequote all
I shoot in RAW+JPEG mode (hey, it doesn't take up too much more memory...) on my D70, as then I have an easy-to-view file and a "negative", so to speak. When I edit photos and decide they're "keepers", I save one in JPEG (quality level 5) and on in TIFF.

Also, the any time photos leave my computer, they're in quality 5 JPEG at a maximum resolution of about 1280x1024 when sending to friends, 750x499 for anywhere else, as to prevent my work being reproduced and passed off as someone else's. I'll bring along TIFF on a flash drive when I get poster-size prints done...