Help!! Whats wrong with my camera!?
Help!! Whats wrong with my camera!?
Author
Discussion

zetec

Original Poster:

5,239 posts

281 months

Sunday 27th August 2006
quotequote all
I took a few general snaps on Wednesday night and noticed a slight banding on the images. Thursday I took a few more snap shots and the pics were fine. Today I went to take a few snaps and the pics were, well....have a look confused

Wednesday night


Thursday


Today


These are just general snaps, so I know they are not great photos. Camera is a Nikon Coolpix5700 which is about 2 1/2 years old. Any help/advice will be greatly aprreciated. Thank you.

edit to add, banding doesn't look so bad now the images are smaller, it's quite bad on full size images.

Edited by zetec on Sunday 27th August 19:19

superlightr

12,920 posts

293 months

Sunday 27th August 2006
quotequote all
certainly doesnt look very healthy ! sorry cant be much more help than that. Write or Pop into a local Nikon dealer and have a chat.

joust

14,622 posts

289 months

Sunday 27th August 2006
quotequote all
The carmera sensor isn't being read out correctly.

Nikon's use 'CCD's that effectivly each sensor in a row is connected to the one next to it, and the image data is 'read' off from one side, with each pixel shifting to the left/right one pixel at a time.

What that last image looks like is that a whole 'row' clock has gone wrong, hence the whole missing lines. Due to the post processing that is being done that also explains the washed out look.

Get it to a repair shop.






(or throw it out and get a 350D - Canon's use CMOS arrays that can never suffer from this sort of issue) )

J

zetec

Original Poster:

5,239 posts

281 months

Sunday 27th August 2006
quotequote all
Thanks guys cool

What puzzles me is the pics I took on Thursday were fine? I have recorded movies and they are fine too??

Joust, thanks for the reply! Somehow I just knew that this might cost me money hehe

CarMac

669 posts

244 months

Sunday 27th August 2006
quotequote all
We had a Dimage which did the same thing a few months ago. It was not cost effective to have it repaired.

That also took video clips ok but the photos were exactly like the one you've posted above.

joust

14,622 posts

289 months

Sunday 27th August 2006
quotequote all
zetec said:
Thanks guys cool
What puzzles me is the pics I took on Thursday were fine? I have recorded movies and they are fine too??
Joust, thanks for the reply! Somehow I just knew that this might cost me money hehe
Movies only use a fraction of the total CCD lines (if you have a 2MP camera, a 320x240 movie will use 1/25th of the CCD), and hence as long as the missing rows aren't the one that it wants to use for the movie you'll be fine.

J

ledaig

1,810 posts

292 months

Monday 28th August 2006
quotequote all
It may be worth trying a firmware update on the off chance it is a software rather than hardware issue.

zetec

Original Poster:

5,239 posts

281 months

Monday 28th August 2006
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies.

I checked the Nikon site for firmware updates and it seems my camera is allready running on the latest software.

I'm gonna take it to Jessops tomorrow to see what they say. I have a feeling it may be a very expensive trip tho hehe

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Monday 28th August 2006
quotequote all
zetec said:
Thanks for the replies.

I checked the Nikon site for firmware updates and it seems my camera is allready running on the latest software.

I'm gonna take it to Jessops tomorrow to see what they say. I have a feeling it may be a very expensive trip tho hehe


Could be a loose connection or a dodgy mode switch (might explain the intermittancy) but still not an easy fix. Probably cheaper to change especially as prices as as low as they have ever been at the moment it seems to me.

I believe in Japan they change cameras when the batteries go flat ....

zetec

Original Poster:

5,239 posts

281 months

Tuesday 29th August 2006
quotequote all
As Joust mentioned the sensor is knackered, Jessops quoted £165 just for Nikon to look at it! Looks like a new camera for me, will be a DSLR hopefully, time to go and have a read up.

Thnks for the help.

superlightr

12,920 posts

293 months

Tuesday 29th August 2006
quotequote all
zetec said:
As Joust mentioned the sensor is knackered, Jessops quoted £165 just for Nikon to look at it! Looks like a new camera for me, will be a DSLR hopefully, time to go and have a read up.

Thnks for the help.


D70s

or

D50

joust

14,622 posts

289 months

Tuesday 29th August 2006
quotequote all
350d... 350d.....

Zad

13,020 posts

266 months

Tuesday 29th August 2006
quotequote all
400d... 400d...

hehe

joust

14,622 posts

289 months

Tuesday 29th August 2006
quotequote all
I suggested 350d as bodies are available around £390 now and kits around £430 so that's not that far from the current cost of his camera.

Of course, if he has a budget similar to what his Nikon cost 2.5 years ago, then 400 would well be the answer!

J

zetec

Original Poster:

5,239 posts

281 months

Tuesday 29th August 2006
quotequote all
Jessops had a D70s+18-70 lens for £599 that is about my budget, however I could stretch for the right camera/lens combo.

Whilst in Jessops today I had a play with both the D70s and 350d, I must admit I felt more comfortable with the D70s as it was bigger and seemed more robust. I'd prefer the D70s over the D50 as I have loasda CF cards. However I am rather wary of Nikon after the problems I have just experienced with my current camera.

It's a minefield out there lol!