Spec sheet for the eye
Author
Discussion

imperialism2024

Original Poster:

1,596 posts

287 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
Found this article quite interesting... at any rate, I hope it's not a repost: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/how-we-see.htm

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

285 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
This says a lot about Ken.


DJ_AS

352 posts

238 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
Interesting article thumbup

Major Bloodnok

1,561 posts

246 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
Some of it seems a bit dubious, though - he's over-simplified some aspects (especially how the visual system in the brain works; that is really fascinating). I'm bit surprised that he didn't point out that our retinas are wired up backwards (which is why we have a blind spot); squid and octopodes have their retina wired correctly and have no blind spot or vision degradation by having a network of nerves between the lens and the receptors.

franv8

2,212 posts

269 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for that - most interesting and enlightening article.

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

256 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
Intriguing stuff

Ken Rockwell said:
Our eyes can't see a fixed, non-moving image. Our eyes are always scanning and moving. If you can lock your eye in one spot (this research usually requires rather painful apparatus to fix an eyeball), the image fades away. Even when we think we're staring, our visual systems are constantly moving our eyes slightly to keep the signals coming and the image refreshed.
Now that, I didn't know

V6GTO

11,579 posts

273 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
But do tou believe everything Ken Rockwell says?

Martin.

Arif110

794 posts

245 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
That's brilliant, mate - good link!

I feel very edified!

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

256 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
V6GTO said:
But do tou believe everything Ken Rockwell says?

Martin.
Yes, unswervingly.

Except where Nikons are concerned biggrin