Lee compatibility with Cokin
Discussion
Does anyone here have experience of both the Lee and Cokin filter systems, or could someone with the Lee system do a quick bit of checking please?
Having decided that the Cokin filter holder is a bit of a weak link due to its lack of robustness, so I'm looking to improve the situation, however........I can't afford or justify a full change to the Lee system right now, so I'm looking at trying to reach a compromise for the time being.
Anyone know if:
a) Cokin filters will fit the Lee holder
and
b) Are the Cokin system lens thread adaptors compatible with the Lee system
If it helps, the Cokin thread adaptor flange has an od of 84.0mm and a width of 1.6mm. The filters are 83.0-84.0mm wide and 1.5mm thick and the circular polarizer has a flange with a diameter of 87.7mm and a width of 1.2mm.
I realise that I have more chance of winning the lottery than the CPL fitting the Lee system, but any help or info would be appreciate.
Cheers

Having decided that the Cokin filter holder is a bit of a weak link due to its lack of robustness, so I'm looking to improve the situation, however........I can't afford or justify a full change to the Lee system right now, so I'm looking at trying to reach a compromise for the time being.
Anyone know if:
a) Cokin filters will fit the Lee holder
and
b) Are the Cokin system lens thread adaptors compatible with the Lee system
If it helps, the Cokin thread adaptor flange has an od of 84.0mm and a width of 1.6mm. The filters are 83.0-84.0mm wide and 1.5mm thick and the circular polarizer has a flange with a diameter of 87.7mm and a width of 1.2mm.
I realise that I have more chance of winning the lottery than the CPL fitting the Lee system, but any help or info would be appreciate.
Cheers

NO
Cokin and Lee are HUGELY different in size. Your lens adaptor might work, but nothing else will.
Lee are much, much, much better and 3 times the size - but also stupidly expensive (especially when you drop them then tread on them). Cokin are ok, (as you know) but are akin to Harry Potter's glasses.
Cokin and Lee are HUGELY different in size. Your lens adaptor might work, but nothing else will.
Lee are much, much, much better and 3 times the size - but also stupidly expensive (especially when you drop them then tread on them). Cokin are ok, (as you know) but are akin to Harry Potter's glasses.
Edited by GetCarter on Saturday 21st July 18:19
GetCarter said:
NO
Cokin and Lee are HUGELY different in size.
Lee are much better but stupidly expensive (especially when you drop them then tread on them). Cokin are ok, but just think Harry Potter's glasses.
This is NOT what I wanted to hear, but thanks. I was at least hoping the filters would fit.Cokin and Lee are HUGELY different in size.
Lee are much better but stupidly expensive (especially when you drop them then tread on them). Cokin are ok, but just think Harry Potter's glasses.
Edited by GetCarter on Saturday 21st July 18:14
Looks like it'll be the expensive option to go down this road

Ok, so another question then (that'll learn you
), what's the lowest wide angle lens the Lee system are practical to use with? I know the website will probably give a 'suggested' minimum, so really just after an experienced opinion.Cheers.
I have used Lee holder/filters on a Minolta 11-18mm (on a Dynax 7D - small sensor) and a Minolta 17-35G (on a Dynax 7 - 35mm film) both without problems. It's the main reason I went for Lee, apart from the better quality. Make sure you get the widangle adapter rings as previously stated.
For info: Lee grads are 100x150mm and a good couple of mm thick
Alan
For info: Lee grads are 100x150mm and a good couple of mm thick
Alan
Edited by Oystercatcher on Saturday 21st July 22:55
Surprised you have problems with the P series on a 15mm lens. I occasionally use a Cokin P series holder with a D200/10-20mm
Vignetting up to 12mm then none after that - at 11mm it's not the end of the world, all it does is alter the aspect ratio of your image slightly.
11mm

12mm

you get the idea
edited to ensure I actually make sense...
Vignetting up to 12mm then none after that - at 11mm it's not the end of the world, all it does is alter the aspect ratio of your image slightly.
11mm

12mm

you get the idea

edited to ensure I actually make sense...
Edited by _dobbo_ on Saturday 21st July 22:55
That’s great, thanks for your replies.
Ben, thanks for posting the pic's, I want to change the 15-30 for a 10-20 at some point so that was extremely useful.
I think the 15-30 suffers due to the distance the filter holder is from the front element, it's a shame really as it is a cracking lens.
Thanks to all.

Ben, thanks for posting the pic's, I want to change the 15-30 for a 10-20 at some point so that was extremely useful.
I think the 15-30 suffers due to the distance the filter holder is from the front element, it's a shame really as it is a cracking lens.
Thanks to all.

Lee make a range of wide angle adapter rings, I can operate at 10mm with no issues (Canon 350D, Sigma 10-20mm). These are more expensive than their standard adapter rings.
GetCarter, if you are hand holding, no wonder you are in more dangr of dropping and putting your foot in it!
davidy
GetCarter, if you are hand holding, no wonder you are in more dangr of dropping and putting your foot in it!
davidy
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




