First attempt at night shots
First attempt at night shots
Author
Discussion

curtisl

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

236 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
I thought i would try out night time shooting for the first time tonight and the results weren't as good as i hoped but a step in the right direction.

I think my focusing needs to be sharper and the iso i am unsure of.

CC wanted.











VxDuncan

2,850 posts

264 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
Can't see anything am afraid.

curtisl

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

236 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
VxDuncan said:
Can't see anything am afraid.
click on the question marks.

still can't create links properly

Simpo Two

92,955 posts

295 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
Yep, very dark!

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
pic 2 is my personal favourite of the 4. The others are a little boring but 2 has got something about it

Simpo Two

92,955 posts

295 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
Dammit you're right Stigmund, I can see it now! The juxtaposition of light and shade in 2 is mystical in its quizzicality, nay a paradigm shift in the recording of the sweet breath of human life, as only sublime mortals may attempt to achieve. Outstanding!

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Dammit you're right Stigmund, I can see it now! The juxtaposition of light and shade in 2 is mystical in its quizzicality, nay a paradigm shift in the recording of the sweet breath of human life, as only sublime mortals may attempt to achieve. Outstanding!
thats the sort of answer that would have gotten me into my tutors kecks. I however never go beyond:

like it

dont like it

/strike a juxtapose

curtisl

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

236 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Simpo Two said:
Dammit you're right Stigmund, I can see it now! The juxtaposition of light and shade in 2 is mystical in its quizzicality, nay a paradigm shift in the recording of the sweet breath of human life, as only sublime mortals may attempt to achieve. Outstanding!
thats the sort of answer that would have gotten me into my tutors kecks. I however never go beyond:

like it

dont like it

/strike a juxtapose
Lets not down play it. i liked the answer, we'll settle for simpo's critique

Simpo Two

92,955 posts

295 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
We may have stumbled on 'virutal photography' here...

AndWhy

2,359 posts

229 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
As steps on a technical learning curve your shots could help you improve - you've already cottoned on to focusing - but you might want to think more about your subject (ie make sure you have one).

While you're outside, in the dark and cold and possibly the damp too, you're already in for a penny. Add the other 99p and try new new stuff: change your angles, shoot reflections (you almost struck lucky with the puddle in the first pic), try a reeeeeeeeaaaaaaallllly long exposure length.

curtisl

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

236 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
AndWhy said:
As steps on a technical learning curve your shots could help you improve - you've already cottoned on to focusing - but you might want to think more about your subject (ie make sure you have one).

While you're outside, in the dark and cold and possibly the damp too, you're already in for a penny. Add the other 99p and try new new stuff: change your angles, shoot reflections (you almost struck lucky with the puddle in the first pic), try a reeeeeeeeaaaaaaallllly long exposure length.
This outing was really just a play around, all shots were taken with 20 sec exposures apart from the building which was 15 secs and a bit of PP. My next trip out i will try to correct the things that i did wrong in this shot and hopfully add some more imagination. with the first pic i tried to get the shadows of the railings and the puddle in the shot but i think that was too much as neither had the desired impact, maybe one or t'other next time eh?

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
Er, I can't see any photos or any links.

curtisl

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

236 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
SamHH said:
Er, I can't see any photos or any links.
I uploading doing [pic] url [/pic] and it hasn't worked.

can you cluick on the x's?

Edited by curtisl on Thursday 1st May 10:10

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
On my screen there are no X's, no question marks, no links but I've now tried quoting your post and the links are there. Weird!

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
Ah, you were linking to the web pages not the images. Should work now.





curtisl

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

236 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
cheers sam.

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

280 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
You're right about your focus, the images aren't as sharp as they could be; were you using a tripod?

If you're using a tripod then rather than ramping up the ISO (and getting a noisier image) you can simply extend the shutter speed. Of course there are advantages and disadvantages; if you lengthen the shutter speed then you'll have longer light trails of cars for example.

curtisl

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

236 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
You're right about your focus, the images aren't as sharp as they could be; were you using a tripod?

If you're using a tripod then rather than ramping up the ISO (and getting a noisier image) you can simply extend the shutter speed. Of course there are advantages and disadvantages; if you lengthen the shutter speed then you'll have longer light trails of cars for example.
I was using a tripod (if you can call it that), probably more suited to a compact camera, also was very windy. The one that came out the sharpest (the building) was precariously balanced on a concrete post with the tripod gripping the edges of the post. I was happier with that shot on my mac, looking at it now, it's a lot darker.

Are there any night time focusing tips as i find it hard to get it spot on when you can just about see the object?

jon-

16,534 posts

246 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
I would probably try and adjust the colour balance in photoshop in post processing to remove some of the reds / oranges you pick up with night shooting.

sjwb

561 posts

238 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
Regarding focus; your camera may have a pre-set programs for landscapes or night scene, in which case it may dispose itself towards infinity. You can of course use manual focus, on or around, the hyperfocal distance of your lens.