An Apology
Author
Discussion

wendyg

Original Poster:

2,071 posts

273 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
You may be aware of a recent thread which started simply enough as a question about depth of field, but deteriorated into mess of offence and recrimination, between myself and Simpo Two.

Having taken time away to cool off, I returned to read the thread in it's entirety.

While I STILL read Simpo's posts as meaning the same as I originally read them, it is abundantly clear that no-one else is interpreting them as I did. This can only mean that the problem is in my head, and that Simpo is not at fault.

I suspect that I projected my own very negative mind-set onto Simpo's posts, and interpreted them in that way. I am also guilty of responding much too hastily, and too harshly.

To Simpo Two, I offer my apology.

To the Mods, please do what you will with the original thread - leave it as an example of blatant idiocy, modify it as Simpo wishes, or delete it inits entirety.

Less formally, Simpo, I'm sorry.

Jenx

11,579 posts

272 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
Wendy,
I never read the original thread so I'm not passing judgement in any way, but it takes a big man person to make a public apology, and I applaud you for it.

Martin.

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
simpo can get a reaction though! hehe

Wendy I read it and I dont think you are an idiot sometimes the tone a poster intends a message is not not how its read by the reader.

Simpo used the ! to claim humour here are a few examples:

simpo you are an idiot.
simpo you are an idiot!
simpo you are an idiot!winksmilehehe

btw simpo you are not an idiotwink

Edited by stigmundfreud on Thursday 15th May 09:02

Altrezia

8,742 posts

241 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
I've not read your original thread - but well done for standing up to this one. If more people did it, this place would be all the better for it.

Podie

46,649 posts

305 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
Altrezia said:
I've not read your original thread - but well done for standing up to this one. If more people did it, this place would be all the better for it.
yes

tim the pool man

5,994 posts

247 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
I only saw the original thread as it was linked elsewhere as an example of someone "going postal" hehe

I did think you misinterpreted Simpo's posts, but you have redeemed yourself (in my eyes at least) with this thread thumbup

toohuge

3,499 posts

246 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
Thank you for the apology, as stated above it takes a good character to make a public apology.

Scho

2,479 posts

233 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
pah!

we need a good row around here from time to time!




stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
Scho said:
pah!

we need a good row around here from time to time!
digital is not real photography as you dont need to learn any skills to take a shot. Just blanket fire and eventually you'll get one right

Major Bloodnok

1,561 posts

245 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Scho said:
pah!

we need a good row around here from time to time!
digital is not real photography as you dont need to learn any skills to take a shot. Just blanket fire and eventually you'll get one right
I quite agree.




(Oh, sorry, was that the wrong response?)

Scho

2,479 posts

233 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Scho said:
pah!

we need a good row around here from time to time!
digital is not real photography as you dont need to learn any skills to take a shot. Just blanket fire and eventually you'll get one right




stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
you shoot direct to jpeg rather than using RAW? Are you Ken Rockwell?

Olf

11,978 posts

248 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
If it's any consolation I can see why you would have got annoyed. Most people would just have dealt with it by using a rolling eyes emoticon though.

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
Olf said:
If it's any consolation I can see why you would have got annoyed. Most people would just have dealt with it by using a rolling eyes emoticon though.
most people arent on blocks though!wink (see simpo it takes thewink)

sublimatica

3,211 posts

284 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Scho said:
pah!

we need a good row around here from time to time!
digital is not real photography as you dont need to learn any skills to take a shot. Just blanket fire and eventually you'll get one right
...thank god.wink

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

255 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
you shoot direct to jpeg rather than using RAW? Are you Ken Rockwell?
Nah, Ken Rockwell shoots straight to dye sublimation.

EmmaP

11,758 posts

269 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
I heard about this thread but could not find it. No sense in digging it up again. Glad everything is sorted.

Simpo Two pissed me off too when I first posted on here if that's any consolationwinkhehe

Edited by EmmaP on Thursday 15th May 16:28

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
stigmundfreud said:
you shoot direct to jpeg rather than using RAW? Are you Ken Rockwell?
Nah, Ken Rockwell shoots straight to dye sublimation.
LOL

NoisyGriff

579 posts

298 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
wendyg said:
...Simpo, I'm sorry.
Good on you. Welcome back.

Ordinary Bloke

4,559 posts

228 months

Thursday 15th May 2008
quotequote all
Does this mean I can say anything I want on PH if I stick a wink on the end?

The PH Sinbin is a dark and lonely place. Nice apology though, fyi I think Simpo's comments (and mine too) in that thread were harmless suggestions, but the interweb can be very misleading.

Poo poo wink