D3 @ 3200 ISO
Author
Discussion

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,293 posts

309 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
Just been playing with the D3 to see if all I have heard is true about high ISO speeds.

It's pretty bloody impressive.

In my experience - less noise at 3200 than on a D2X at 800 ISO

FYI

3200 ISO followed by a 100% crop handheld (using AFS-Nikkor 24-70 2.8 G-ED)




AndWhy

2,359 posts

229 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
That is amazing. Glass helps, I'm sure, but it's not only low noise that impresses, it's the way it's retained tone.

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,293 posts

309 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
I should have dusted the top of the baragraph - looks like noise!

VxDuncan

2,850 posts

264 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
AndWhy said:
That is amazing. Glass helps, I'm sure, but it's not only low noise that impresses, it's the way it's retained tone.
I agree, the tonal range and saturation are pretty impressive.

Oh, and git. biggrin

Looks like a D700 upgrade maybe in order soon!

Stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
yes looks amazing, I personally cannot wait to see what canon do next. I'm not getting the next 5d update but wait until that, hopefully a 24bit 20+mp sensor

fergusd

1,251 posts

300 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
Frankly it changes the rules, ISO speed is basically no longer an issue . . . it means you can take pictures where you otherwise could not . . . I shot a load of images today at 1600 ISO without giving it one thought, the images out of the camera don't need anything done to them apart from a crop . . . it's a different world from the D2x . . .

I should also say that the AF and metering systems are just as much a step forwards as ISO noise performance . . .

Fd

Simpo Two

92,939 posts

295 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
Turning the D700 down to ISO200 feels like doing 30 in the Griff...

stuthemong

2,534 posts

247 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
Yes, they are just stunning cameras.

I'm very tempted by a d700, but then a D3X may be awesome when it comes.....

This latest batch of DSLR's are kick ass. Film /v/ digital internet willy waving fights have all but disappeared smile

CVP

2,799 posts

305 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
fergusd said:
Frankly it changes the rules, ISO speed is basically no longer an issue . . . it means you can take pictures where you otherwise could not . . . I shot a load of images today at 1600 ISO without giving it one thought, the images out of the camera don't need anything done to them apart from a crop . . . it's a different world from the D2x . . .

I should also say that the AF and metering systems are just as much a step forwards as ISO noise performance . . .

Fd
Agreed, don't forget one of the other things about the great ISO performance is the knock on effect that has in the creative ability you have to use flash.

Chris

lowdrag

13,187 posts

243 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
I'm going to finish the season with my D2X and then consider the options. For me, the most important thing is the dust sealing, not the price difference. I bought a D70 a few years back to learn DSLR photography while still using the F5 and had to clean the sensor too many times but the D2X, no matter what the conditions, has never had to be cleaned in two years of heavy use. Now Nikon say that the D700 is somewhere between the D300 and the D3 on this subject, so I reckon I'll have a good chat to Gray's of westminster before making the decision.

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,293 posts

309 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
I very nearly went for the D700 (in fact I cancelled an order for one).

Reasons I went for the D3

Battery life (big issue) - guaranteed for twice the actuations - button layout I was used to - I have several compatible batteries - 100% viewfinder (what on earth were Nikon on when they only gave the D700 95%?) - I'm not changing lenses so won't worry about dust cleaners - not much price difference (Got the D3 for 2.1k plus VAT).

D700 is obviously a great camera - but I just know I would have bought the extra grip (battery) which would have made it heavier than the D3!

I guess if I'd been changing lenses and wasn't coming from a D2X with similar everything it would have been EVEN more difficult to choose.


Edited by GetCarter on Monday 11th August 15:18

Simpo Two

92,939 posts

295 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
what on earth were Nikon on when they only gave the D700 95%?
I heard it was to accommodate the sensor cleaning mechanism, which the D3 lacks. However, I'm not particularly interested in that nor the 95% VF, so it just shows you how different people have different wants and needs smile

4hero

4,505 posts

241 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
nice dimmer switches Steve wink

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,293 posts

309 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
4hero said:
nice dimmer switches Steve wink
I should get out more

4hero

4,505 posts

241 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
Sorry, forgot to mention about the iso, that's pretty good for 3200! If only canon was as good hehe

p.s. nice dimmers, I'm easily pleased when it comes to electrical goodies getmecoat

Edited by 4hero on Monday 11th August 19:10

GetCarter

Original Poster:

31,293 posts

309 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
OK... maybe it's you that should get out more.wink