Shoot the moon
Author
Discussion

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Tuesday 7th April 2009
quotequote all
Reasonably clear skies without the usual shrivelling drop in temperature to go with it prompted me to have another go at shooting the moon this evening. I think it was worth it for what I ended up with.


R1chy11

890 posts

211 months

Tuesday 7th April 2009
quotequote all
Now that is pretty amazing, great shot

L4MBOLUV3R

1,935 posts

225 months

Tuesday 7th April 2009
quotequote all
thats an amazing shot, what where you using?

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Tuesday 7th April 2009
quotequote all
A Canon 40D attached to Lambochick's Celestron (snigger!!) wink

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
how easy is it to hook up the body to the scope?

Pvapour

8,981 posts

283 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
Love that, been watching & waiting down here for the moons full faze, its getting there (few more days) so tried one last night & it was awafull!!

What settings did you use? or would you use if you weren't aloud to handle LamboChicks goods biggrin and you had say.... a 300 zoom biggrin

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
how easy is it to hook up the body to the scope?
Quite easy. Just need a T-ring adapter that fits to the camera, and a mount adapter (I use one from Meade) that the T-ring fits to, and which then screws on to the back of the scope.

Pvapour said:
Love that, been watching & waiting down here for the moons full faze, its getting there (few more days) so tried one last night & it was awafull!!

What settings did you use? or would you use if you weren't aloud to handle LamboChicks goods biggrin and you had say.... a 300 zoom biggrin
I think the Celestron is the equivalent of f/11, and I think I was shooting at 1/160s. If anything I think my shots may have been about 1/2 stop underexposed straight out of the camera. If you start with f/11 and 1/100s or 1/125s, you shouldn't be far off for a full moon.

Strangely enough, you often get better results when the moon isn't full, as the sun casts some marvellous shadows along the terminator which shows up a lot more detail.


stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
I saw a moon shot (on here) recently that was taken with a scope but it showed the colours on the moon. Having never seen the moon through a scope is it effectively bw which would suggest the picture had been painted, or does the moon surface actaully have different rock pigmentation?

Yellabelly

2,258 posts

283 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
I saw a moon shot (on here) recently that was taken with a scope but it showed the colours on the moon. Having never seen the moon through a scope is it effectively bw which would suggest the picture had been painted, or does the moon surface actaully have different rock pigmentation?
You've been staying up too late!

Was it this one from the 10th March - HOW TO SHOOT THE MOON, where you asked the following

stigmundfreud said:
DIW35 said:
Not really - a telescope is just a big lens.

I have a couple at wallpaper sort of size - 1280x1024 if that's of any use to you.

Shot posted above

Half moon similar to above

Half moon without the colour
numpty question how do you go about attatching the camera to a telescope?
wink

Edited by Yellabelly on Wednesday 8th April 13:02

The Tea Boy

4,129 posts

265 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
ok another numpty question here, but as some of you know i have recently moved out into the counrtyside and have alot better view of the skies and not as much light poloution, i have tried to take a few pics of the moon with my 300mm on the sony A200 but cant get anything like this not even close after cropping other than a white splodge, tried different speeds from 1/60th to 300 but to no avail, help please.

Matt

Pierscoe1

2,458 posts

291 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
fantastic pictures, both of the ones above...

now I have a 300mm zoom, but am thinking it's probably not up to this sort of thing, and I know nothing about telescopes..

are there any good links/beginners guides around, particularly for how to pick a suitable scope for taking pics of the moon and maybe saturn etc??

How much would you have to spend for results like the above? I presume they're like conventional lenses and you could easily spend many thousands should you want to...

andy-xr

13,204 posts

234 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
The Tea Boy said:
ok another numpty question here, but as some of you know i have recently moved out into the counrtyside and have alot better view of the skies and not as much light poloution, i have tried to take a few pics of the moon with my 300mm on the sony A200 but cant get anything like this not even close after cropping other than a white splodge, tried different speeds from 1/60th to 300 but to no avail, help please.

Matt
Damn thing moves quite quickly. I've tried it twice with a 300mm and never really got what I was looking for

This is around 100% crop, the EXIF says 1/25 @ F22 and I was on a tripod


The Tea Boy

4,129 posts

265 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
The Tea Boy said:
ok another numpty question here, but as some of you know i have recently moved out into the counrtyside and have alot better view of the skies and not as much light poloution, i have tried to take a few pics of the moon with my 300mm on the sony A200 but cant get anything like this not even close after cropping other than a white splodge, tried different speeds from 1/60th to 300 but to no avail, help please.

Matt
Damn thing moves quite quickly. I've tried it twice with a 300mm and never really got what I was looking for

This is around 100% crop, the EXIF says 1/25 @ F22 and I was on a tripod

Right just been outside for the last hour try all of the settings eg ISO shutter speed (f) etc, and im rather excited as i think i have sussed it. Pics to follow tomorrow morning if i remember to take camera to work smile

Matt

beano500

20,854 posts

305 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
... and I was on a tripod.
Isn't it better to put the camera on that.....?

andy-xr

13,204 posts

234 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
beano500 said:
andy-xr said:
... and I was on a tripod.
Isn't it better to put the camera on that.....?
hehe

No Doctor, I just stumbled backwards, and...

Bernie-the-bolt

15,399 posts

280 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
Moon shots are always interesting, how many times has it been hit by rubbish floating around the galaxy!

Great shot from the OP, my effort last full moon below:




DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
Bernie, you are absolutely right; the moon is a fascinating subject, and I never tire of looking at it.

Tea Boy, if your moon shots are coming out as a white splodge, they are over exposed. If you are using your camera on automatic or semi-automatic, the camera is easily fooled in to thinking the scene is too dark, and will over expose as a reult. This is because the moon occupies a very small portion of the sky, and probably isn't occupying enough of the viewfinder for a correct exposure to be made by the camera. To get round this you should set your camera to manual. As a starting point for a full moon, I would suggest that you start at f/11 with an exposure time of around 1/125s. Hopefully that should get you closer to a correct exposure.

Stiggy, this may have been the 'coloured' shot you were talking of. The colours are real, and are a result of different minerals etc on the moon's surface. They are not really obvious, even through a telescope, though it is possible to discern a faint trace if you look carefully. Post processing in Photoshop helps to emphasise them and bring them out, but nothing has been added to give a false impression.


stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
Yellabelly said:
stigmundfreud said:
I saw a moon shot (on here) recently that was taken with a scope but it showed the colours on the moon. Having never seen the moon through a scope is it effectively bw which would suggest the picture had been painted, or does the moon surface actaully have different rock pigmentation?
You've been staying up too late!

Was it this one from the 10th March - HOW TO SHOOT THE MOON, where you asked the following

stigmundfreud said:
DIW35 said:
Not really - a telescope is just a big lens.

I have a couple at wallpaper sort of size - 1280x1024 if that's of any use to you.

Shot posted above

Half moon similar to above

Half moon without the colour
numpty question how do you go about attatching the camera to a telescope?
wink

Edited by Yellabelly on Wednesday 8th April 13:02
Its too much masturbation, it fries the brain! So it was the OP that did the colour shots biggrin HOW?!? biggrin

beano500

20,854 posts

305 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
....and about the best I can manage. Nice steady tripod set up I have now, which helps tremendously. Don't underestimate the benefits of a sturdy tripod weighted down and a bean bag or two over the lens.


100% from a 70-200 plus 1.4TC f/8 at 1/320 ISO 200


stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th April 2009
quotequote all
i would gladly invest in a scope and all the gear just for that shot. I showed the guys at work when I first saw it, it blew them away!

Honestly it was the best image I had ever noticed of the moon. I sat for ages with it on my desktop just looking at the detail!