Ford Zodiac Photo Shoot
Discussion
Another 3&5 vote here. I also like 4 - the car position/ direction doesn't bother me but I wonder if it could do with a bit of sympathetic processing/ toning, just to make it look a bit more like a 60s shot.
Being really picky, looks like your strobe to the front of the car has picked out some of the undercarriage, could you have raised the light at all.
The locations both work, good choice there.
Being really picky, looks like your strobe to the front of the car has picked out some of the undercarriage, could you have raised the light at all.
The locations both work, good choice there.
stigmundfreud said:
3 for me too! Would like number 3 but car flipped to face camera
3 seems popular 
AndWhyNot said:
Another 3&5 vote here. I also like 4 - the car position/ direction doesn't bother me but I wonder if it could do with a bit of sympathetic processing/ toning, just to make it look a bit more like a 60s shot.
Being really picky, looks like your strobe to the front of the car has picked out some of the undercarriage, could you have raised the light at all.
The locations both work, good choice there.
I'll have a go at the processing on 4, it was a challenge putting in the background in the first place!Being really picky, looks like your strobe to the front of the car has picked out some of the undercarriage, could you have raised the light at all.
The locations both work, good choice there.
On the bridge the light was too far away and too low as I was worried about a passing car hitting it/wind catching it and knocking it off the bridge onto the motorway!
The location in the first shot was limiting as the owner of the (private) land came out and went f
king mental!!! Screaming and everything!!! - I just said that I was taking that I was taking some photos for my A level photography (a lie) and that we wern't doing any harm, which she suddenly seemed ok with...miniman said:
Very nice, but spoiled for me (as ever) by my eye being drawn straight to the blanked-out number plate.
Thanks 
Sorry - owner's request

George
GFWilliams said:
The location in the first shot was limiting as the owner of the (private) land came out and went f
king mental!!! Screaming and everything!!! - I just said that I was taking that I was taking some photos for my A level photography (a lie) and that we wern't doing any harm, which she suddenly seemed ok with...
No way! I do a fair bit of accessing others' land in my night photography but I'm not brave enough to take a car up someone's drive. Don't know whether to pat you on the back or give you a slap
king mental!!! Screaming and everything!!! - I just said that I was taking that I was taking some photos for my A level photography (a lie) and that we wern't doing any harm, which she suddenly seemed ok with...
Mind you, if the owner was with you/ parked it there I guess the onus is on him.AndWhyNot said:
GFWilliams said:
The location in the first shot was limiting as the owner of the (private) land came out and went f
king mental!!! Screaming and everything!!! - I just said that I was taking that I was taking some photos for my A level photography (a lie) and that we wern't doing any harm, which she suddenly seemed ok with...
No way! I do a fair bit of accessing others' land in my night photography but I'm not brave enough to take a car up someone's drive. Don't know whether to pat you on the back or give you a slap
king mental!!! Screaming and everything!!! - I just said that I was taking that I was taking some photos for my A level photography (a lie) and that we wern't doing any harm, which she suddenly seemed ok with...
Mind you, if the owner was with you/ parked it there I guess the onus is on him.This woman wen't proper mental though - she even kicked and screemed at her dog when it followed her

oh well, can't use that location again...
GFWilliams said:
//dean said:
Nice George!
All nice and simple.
Don't like the angle on 2 - way to harsh. 4 is erm, imtersting. 6 is a bit strange and out of keeping with the others. Really like 3, those leading lines are great.
Thanks for the crit Dean All nice and simple.
Don't like the angle on 2 - way to harsh. 4 is erm, imtersting. 6 is a bit strange and out of keeping with the others. Really like 3, those leading lines are great.

Am I improving or are you getting less harsh?

s3fella said:
Ace shots. Real nice. The inside driving shot is very nice, almost looks like a cartoon!
And why can they not make cars as cool as the old ones!
Post some more!
Thanks And why can they not make cars as cool as the old ones!
Post some more!

I can't post more as it was only an hour photo shoot!
//dean said:
GFWilliams said:
//dean said:
Nice George!
All nice and simple.
Don't like the angle on 2 - way to harsh. 4 is erm, imtersting. 6 is a bit strange and out of keeping with the others. Really like 3, those leading lines are great.
Thanks for the crit Dean All nice and simple.
Don't like the angle on 2 - way to harsh. 4 is erm, imtersting. 6 is a bit strange and out of keeping with the others. Really like 3, those leading lines are great.

Am I improving or are you getting less harsh?

Cheers mate 
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff









well done, great shots
