Nikon D5000.. Why 'shouldnt' I buy one?
Nikon D5000.. Why 'shouldnt' I buy one?
Author
Discussion

PapaHett

Original Poster:

2,124 posts

199 months

Sunday 7th March 2010
quotequote all
I'm new to the whole camera thing, and want to pick up a DSLR.. I went to Jessops last week to check out some cameras, the Canon 1000D, 450D and Nikon D3000 and D5000.. Instantly I prefered the two higher end cameras, the 450D and the D5000. The Grip on both of them felt alot bigger, and fitted my hand better. I used them both for a bit, and overall I preferred the D5000. It felt good in my hand, and by just using it in the shop, I was able to take the sort of Macro pictures that I want.

The thing I didn't like was the price tag though.. £529, with a £50 cashback from Nikon (So £479 I think). I didn't really want to spend anymore than £400, but I found out the other day that I have £190 built up from bonus' at work; I didn't realise I had built up so much already (I work in retail). This £190 can only be claimed in the form of a voucher though.. But I can basically get the voucher for anywhere, John Lewis, PC World etc that all have the D5000.

That means i'll be able to buy a D5000 for £330~ (Will probably give some vouchers to my mum for Mothers Day)..

So, is there any real reason I shouldn't buy a D5000?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

278 months

Sunday 7th March 2010
quotequote all
PapaHett said:
So, is there any real reason I shouldn't buy a D5000?
Its a stiiinking nikon!

But apart from that? Dont think so, no major downfalls with the D5000 unless you want to use non AF-S lenses, it doesnt have a built in body motor so you loose autofocus ( with most shorter primes, older lenses etc).


LightningMat

206 posts

223 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
I have a D5000 myself and it is absolutely fantastic, would recommend. I looked at all of the competition and chose the D5000 above all else.

Picture quality is brilliant and it is fairly light and is easy to use, but with all the usual DSLR options for you to get stuck into. It really is difficult to justify spending any more for the 'higher range' DSLR's unless you are a pro.

TuscNick

817 posts

262 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
I have one too, I am very very pleased with it

Nick

mcflurry

9,184 posts

277 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
Pleased with mine.

The main limitation are you are tied to AFS lenses to get auto focus. Many other Nikon lenses do fit however smile


Simpo Two

91,570 posts

289 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
mcflurry said:
The main limitation are you are tied to AFS lenses to get auto focus. Many other Nikon lenses do fit however smile
In theory, every one since 1959!

PapaHett

Original Poster:

2,124 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
That's the sort of reassurance I was looking for!

Do you guys make much use of the screen on the D5000, I really liked the idea of it..

Also, is it with the D5000 that if you want to change any of the settings; ISO etc.. You have to keep scrolling through a menu? There's not a straightforward up/down/left/right to increase or decrease them?

Simpo Two

91,570 posts

289 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
PapaHett said:
Also, is it with the D5000 that if you want to change any of the settings; ISO etc.. You have to keep scrolling through a menu? There's not a straightforward up/down/left/right to increase or decrease them?
Those sorts of things do tend to be more buried in entry level cameras, yes.

Have a read at www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond5000/

d1d215

266 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
yeah ! I hate them for that ! the first camera that has the ISO as a normal button is D300s I guess. sooo difficult to make lets say D90 with a button on the camera, but then every amateur photographer would buy D90 instead of D300s . one of those silly marketing tricks.

GlenMH

5,417 posts

267 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
d1d215 said:
yeah ! I hate them for that ! the first camera that has the ISO as a normal button is D300s I guess. sooo difficult to make lets say D90 with a button on the camera, but then every amateur photographer would buy D90 instead of D300s . one of those silly marketing tricks.
Errr - it IS a button on my D90...

d1d215

266 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
oh ! yeah ! sorry! it's on the left side of the menu. I was just used to changing it on the top of the camera . great discovery for me ! lol biggrin

TuscNick

817 posts

262 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
PapaHett said:
Do you guys make much use of the screen on the D5000, I really liked the idea of it..
I think the screen is great, its easy to understand and use - as they say pictures speak a thousand words

Nick

mcflurry

9,184 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
I prefer the old fashioned viewfinder, but that's just me. You can turn liveview on and off with a single button. The f stops and timing numbers can be seen at the bottom of the viewfinder too, and move as you adjust the rear control dial under the go button, or the ambient light changes.

The ISO (as well as white balance, exposure, flash, bracketing etc) are scrollable when you push the info button at the bottom left when in full manual mode. If you are in auto then most functions are "greyed out".


Simpo Two

91,570 posts

289 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
d1d215 said:
yeah ! I hate them for that ! the first camera that has the ISO as a normal button is D300s I guess. sooo difficult to make lets say D90 with a button on the camera, but then every amateur photographer would buy D90 instead of D300s . one of those silly marketing tricks.
Well, they use the space for buttons like 'Live View' and 'Info' instead, which they think beginners are more likely to use. By contrast ISO is deemed more advanced/less likely to be accessed regularly.

But no camera is perfect.