Photography and the police?
Photography and the police?
Author
Discussion

Conor D

Original Poster:

2,124 posts

205 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
I was down at a Lidl car park, which is right beside a big junction.. I was messing about with my new DSLR and had it sitting on a tripod beside my car. I was trying to do some light trails, alot of people passed no remarks and just drove on.. A few people sort of stopped, and wondered what I was at (Including a Police car).

They drove on, and I knew by the way they looked that they'd be back. A few minutes later they pulled into the car park, and pulled up beside my car. They basically just asked me what I was at, and that someone had reported me?

I guess I passed the attitude test, and just told them that I was finishing up here.. They asked about the camera, and I showed them some of the pictures. They then said there was nothing wrong with what I was doing, but some people wont like people taking their photograph/video.

Is it fairly common to get hasstle from the police?

fastfreddy

8,577 posts

267 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
Yes, but as long as you're polite and understand your rights you'll be fine.

JimNotJon

761 posts

239 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
As fastfreddy said. If your ok with them then they are generally ok with you. Makes me laugh though, I have been asked what I was doing one evening in Lincoln when I was out with my camera, they also used the infamous line "someone has reported you", yeah right.

wendyg

2,071 posts

273 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
JimNotJon said:
, they also used the infamous line "someone has reported you", yeah right.
Hi JNJ, isn't that the usual way? If people are smashing windows and setting fire to lampposts, it's not the concern of the police, until someone reports it, and then they still do FA.

But is some oversensitive tit reports (and they are much more likely to!) they will be right on you because that ticks boxes.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
IMO thats utterly ridiculous, you were photographing a car in a car park, hardly worth the police's intrest.

It seems police harrasment is still their top priority in police state UK.

Sheets Tabuer

21,449 posts

245 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
Have you seen the posters about a plot was foiled because someone was reported for looking at CCTV or had stuff hanging out of their bins?

Welcome to the UK.

AndWhyNot

2,359 posts

229 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
wendyg said:
JimNotJon said:
, they also used the infamous line "someone has reported you", yeah right.
Hi JNJ, isn't that the usual way? If people are smashing windows and setting fire to lampposts, it's not the concern of the police, until someone reports it, and then they still do FA.

But is some oversensitive tit reports (and they are much more likely to!) they will be right on you because that ticks boxes.
???

Moving on, if it happens again- which it probably will at night- just keep a cool attitude and let them establish you're simply taking pictures, just as you seem to have done this time. I've had 8-10 encounters with the police due to where/ when/ what I've been shooting and they've all been resolved promptly and amicably. I think they've each been situations where the police happened to spot me in action rather than been called out to investigate.

XG332

3,927 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
this has got me thinking.
They asked to view your images, what would happen if i was using one of my film SLRs?
If they wanted to seize the roll, are they allowed to in this situation?

Conor D

Original Poster:

2,124 posts

205 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
XG332 said:
this has got me thinking.
They asked to view your images, what would happen if i was using one of my film SLRs?
If they wanted to seize the roll, are they allowed to in this situation?
They didn't ask to see them, I had just explained to them what I was doing and that I wasn't actually taking pictures or videos of peoples cars.. Just really the lights, and then showed them.

10JH

2,070 posts

224 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
Wonder how many people reported the Google street view cars when they were out and about...

Fletch79

1,643 posts

227 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
Ther is an ongoing thing at the moment with photgraphers and police harasment.

The police are using part of the terrorism act (i beleive) where they shouldn't be!
Have a look here .. these guys seem to have had a few of there forum users getting some serious hassle from the bobbies!!

http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread...

XG332

3,927 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
Conor D said:
XG332 said:
this has got me thinking.
They asked to view your images, what would happen if i was using one of my film SLRs?
If they wanted to seize the roll, are they allowed to in this situation?
I meant In general, the norm is the police want to know who you are, what you are doing, and if they can view the images. Obv on film the latter is not possible.
Would they take the film and have it processed?

They didn't ask to see them, I had just explained to them what I was doing and that I wasn't actually taking pictures or videos of peoples cars.. Just really the lights, and then showed them.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
The police have no rights to stop you or touch your kit unless they have other evidence of wrongdoing.

Reasonless hastle from them is purely harrasment from The Man to promote a police state.

JimNotJon

761 posts

239 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
wendyg said:
JimNotJon said:
, they also used the infamous line "someone has reported you", yeah right.
Hi JNJ, isn't that the usual way? If people are smashing windows and setting fire to lampposts, it's not the concern of the police, until someone reports it, and then they still do FA.

But is some oversensitive tit reports (and they are much more likely to!) they will be right on you because that ticks boxes.
Oh come on. You can't tell me that every time I or anyone else have been interupted by the bib for taking pictures that a genuinely concerned member of the public has called to report a someone with a camera taking photos, bit too much of a coinsidence really.

The point is, if you haven't done anything wrong don't worry about a visit from them and as said just be civilised, I have never been told to stop what I am doing so I don't personally have a problem
with them.

Edited by JimNotJon on Friday 23 April 10:42

Muska

1,174 posts

212 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
http://photographernotaterrorist.org/bust-card/

Know your rights, print this out and keep it with you when out taking pictures.

itsnotarace

4,685 posts

239 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
The police have no rights to stop you or touch your kit unless they have other evidence of wrongdoing.
Sorry but that's not correct. For a start, the OP was in a private car park so technically trespassing (unless he had permission from Lidl) , and the tripod could be seen as causing an obstruction.

http://www.sirimo.co.uk/2009/05/14/uk-photographer...

tog

4,954 posts

258 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
itsnotarace said:
RobDickinson said:
The police have no rights to stop you or touch your kit unless they have other evidence of wrongdoing.
Sorry but that's not correct. For a start, the OP was in a private car park so technically trespassing (unless he had permission from Lidl) , and the tripod could be seen as causing an obstruction.

http://www.sirimo.co.uk/2009/05/14/uk-photographer...
Well in that case the police have even fewer rights to move him on, unless Lidl had asked him to leave and he'd refused. Trespass is not a criminal offence.

itsnotarace

4,685 posts

239 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
But they didn't ask him to move on, merely questioned what he was doing

craigbunyan

102 posts

230 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
Mate of mine and I had a run in with the police last year while attempting to get some long-exposure shots of the stacks at Grangemouth refinery. We were parked on a quiet public street and had been there for around 10min before some guys from the plant turned up with the yellow vests and wakie talkies. They informed us that we were not allowed to take pictures of the chimneys (company policy) and that we had to stop. Furthermore, we could not leave until the police (whom they had called before they arrived) attended. They also claimed to have already passed on our registration details to the police.

10 min later the cops turned up and the refinery guys buggered off. The police were very apologetic - they explained that we weren't doing anything illegal but that they were obligated (not sure who by) to take our details and run a vehicle check. It was all very amicable but they still made us leave (though they admitted that they didn't have the power to actually stop us).

We headed home, pissed off and angry - they don't mind building the plant in the middle of a pretty bit of the fourth, but heaven forbid you should look at it or worse take pictures.

C.


Got this shot on the way home with the B+W 10stop screwed on.


MonkeyHanger

9,267 posts

272 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
craigbunyan said:
Mate of mine and I had a run in with the police last year while attempting to get some long-exposure shots of the stacks at Grangemouth refinery. We were parked on a quiet public street and had been there for around 10min before some guys from the plant turned up with the yellow vests and wakie talkies. They informed us that we were not allowed to take pictures of the chimneys (company policy) and that we had to stop.
At that point you should have informed them that "Company Policy" starts & finishes at the Site Main Gate and told them to go away and bother someone else.