Canon Wonder Camera
Author
Discussion

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

214 months

Simpo Two

92,796 posts

295 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
'an incredible focal length from macro to 500mm'

Hmm. And the focal length of macro would be...?

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

233 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
'an incredible focal length from macro to 500mm'

Hmm. And the focal length of macro would be...?
hehe

A lot seem to be around 100mm...but 100-500mm lenses are already availablebiggrin



Cheers.

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
Hmm.

What next? A Depth of Field tool or action in PSWonder?

fathomfive

11,224 posts

220 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
Can it show me what the alloys on my car would look like in black? hehe

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
fathomfive said:
Can it show me what the alloys on my car would look like in black? hehe
What colour are they now?

tinman0

18,231 posts

270 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
Interesting how it says you can take a still from any frame in the video - but can't Red do that already? Thought Red was running 24fps at 10M.

...Mole...

2,780 posts

221 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
LongQ said:
Hmm.

What next? A Depth of Field tool or action in PSWonder?
http://www.dofpro.com/

I use this at work for depth of field on 3D stuff, can give alright results with photographs as well.

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

233 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
...Mole... said:
LongQ said:
Hmm.

What next? A Depth of Field tool or action in PSWonder?
http://www.dofpro.com/

I use this at work for depth of field on 3D stuff, can give alright results with photographs as well.
Always liked the look of dofpro, not sure how i'd feel about painting depth masks for my shots though hehe

Always easier to render out a quick z-depth pass, once SLRs manage that I'm completely sold biggrin I'd even swap to Nikon wink


Cheers.

...Mole...

2,780 posts

221 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
flat-planedCrank said:
Always easier to render out a quick z-depth pass, once SLRs manage that I'm completely sold biggrin I'd even swap to Nikon wink
Indeed, I would maybe even swap for a Canon tongue out






...probably not though.

Edited by ...Mole... on Tuesday 13th July 21:50

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

233 months

Tuesday 13th July 2010
quotequote all
...Mole... said:
...probably not though.
hehe

Kermit power

29,622 posts

243 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Interesting how it says you can take a still from any frame in the video - but can't Red do that already? Thought Red was running 24fps at 10M.
That there is what I think would doom this.

In the article, they're talking about frame rates of 240-600 fps. Personally, I'd rather accept that I got what I got when I took the shots rather than spend hours wading through just a few seconds of footage to find the best stills.

tinman0

18,231 posts

270 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Kermit power said:
tinman0 said:
Interesting how it says you can take a still from any frame in the video - but can't Red do that already? Thought Red was running 24fps at 10M.
That there is what I think would doom this.

In the article, they're talking about frame rates of 240-600 fps. Personally, I'd rather accept that I got what I got when I took the shots rather than spend hours wading through just a few seconds of footage to find the best stills.
The way I read the 240-600 fps was an opportunity to start running HDR on the fly both in still frames and in a camcorder mode. So if you are running 240 fps, you simply pull 3-5 frames together with differing exposures, and you still have a video camera capable of 80fps with HDR frames.

Kermit power

29,622 posts

243 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Kermit power said:
tinman0 said:
Interesting how it says you can take a still from any frame in the video - but can't Red do that already? Thought Red was running 24fps at 10M.
That there is what I think would doom this.

In the article, they're talking about frame rates of 240-600 fps. Personally, I'd rather accept that I got what I got when I took the shots rather than spend hours wading through just a few seconds of footage to find the best stills.
The way I read the 240-600 fps was an opportunity to start running HDR on the fly both in still frames and in a camcorder mode. So if you are running 240 fps, you simply pull 3-5 frames together with differing exposures, and you still have a video camera capable of 80fps with HDR frames.
Even at 24fps, would you want to run through 120 stills just to find the best one out of 5 seconds of filming?

tinman0

18,231 posts

270 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Kermit power said:
Even at 24fps, would you want to run through 120 stills just to find the best one out of 5 seconds of filming?
Why not? Guys on this forum will spend hours on a single frame in photoshop getting it just right.