Struggling to find lens . . .
Struggling to find lens . . .
Author
Discussion

Busa_Rush

Original Poster:

6,930 posts

280 months

Monday 1st November 2010
quotequote all
I need a lens for use in very dark places, caves, ex cold war bunkers, deserted underground works etc with no lighting. Flash can usually be used and there is occasionally temporary lighting but light levels are always poor/low and the areas are quite large.

I've got a 5d mk ii so it needs to be a full frame EF lens. I currently have a 50mm f1.8 II but I need a wider lens. I don't really need a zoom and given the result of photography in places like this, spending a lot on a fancy lens doesn't seem a great idea.

Looked at the Canon 20mm f2.8 but it gets very poor reviews and is still only 2.8. Can't afford the 24mm f1.4 II USM - £1300 for a single non-zoom lens is a bit much for me.

Are there any reasonable alternatives in the 18mm-24mm area with f1.8 or better ? Budget is up to about £350.

I have a 17-40 but f4 isn't very helpful.

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

232 months

Monday 1st November 2010
quotequote all
28mm f1.8? Can't think of anything wider than that for the budget.

XG332

3,927 posts

217 months

Monday 1st November 2010
quotequote all
Ram home the ISO

Simpo Two

92,766 posts

294 months

Monday 1st November 2010
quotequote all
Both of those should do it. And a tripod.

Kermit power

29,622 posts

242 months

Monday 1st November 2010
quotequote all
Have you looked at Sigma primes? I've not used any, but they've got 20, 24 and 28mm at f1.8 and 30mm at f1.4 at prices ranging between £320 and £480. Worth trying to find somewhere you can test drive one?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
Honestly how much of the room/cave do you think you will get in DOF at f1.4 ?

Tripod and multiple flashes would be better, you only need the one speedlight.

Otherwise theres a samyang 14mm2.8 or a 35f1.4 but thats likely over budget..


Edited by RobDickinson on Tuesday 2nd November 05:33

Busa_Rush

Original Poster:

6,930 posts

280 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Honestly how much of the room/cave do you think you will get in DOF at f1.4 ?

Tripod and multiple flashes would be better, you only need the one speedlight.

Otherwise theres a samyang 14mm2.8 or a 35f1.4 but thats likely over budget..


Edited by RobDickinson on Tuesday 2nd November 05:33
I realise that but with such lenses the whole lens is larger so even when stopped down you get more light entering the front of the lens than you would with an f4 17-40 for example. Or is this too marginal to make any difference ?

Simpo Two

92,766 posts

294 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
Busa_Rush said:
I realise that but with such lenses the whole lens is larger so even when stopped down you get more light entering the front of the lens than you would with an f4 17-40 for example. Or is this too marginal to make any difference ?
Sadly f/x is f/x regardless of the size of the front element.

taylor172

833 posts

233 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
have a look at this chaps work,

hes a nikon geek but maybe worth messaging him
http://www.flickr.com/photos/urb_edd/

Mr Whippy

32,453 posts

270 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
Tripod and ISO up...?

DOF on the 5D and 50m 1.8 is a joke to start with, so I'd want to run f5 or more at least. Probably could do with a wider lens though, the 50mm on the 5D is still quite "narrow" vs a proper wide angle lens on a non-full frame for example smile

Dave

Busa_Rush

Original Poster:

6,930 posts

280 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
Thanks, getting into these places myself is hard enough without getting a tripod down there too. Flash is difficult to use and if you go firing off a decent flash at people who's eyes have accustomed to a dark environment, you end up either having to give them 5 mins for the dots to disappear or dodge the rocks as they sling them at you for making them blind smile

I need a wider lens anyway, will look at Sigma, thanks.

Mr Whippy

32,453 posts

270 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
Bit of a long shot, but might some kind of IR lamp and a lens coated for this kind of thing be useful? (if it even exists?!) Then you can flood the scene with IR light!?

Or maybe even a less bright 'constant' light will be less anti-social, and give you many factors more light to work with than you have with just ambient lighting?

Dave

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
I really doubt that this is a lens issue.

You need light - off camera flash for example. You can warn people that you are about to use it so that they don't stare are the things.

Alternatively, but probably well outside budget, a Pro photographer I was talking to recently said a friend of his, also a pro, was delighted with a shot taken in near darkness with a Canon 1D Mk4 at ISO 102,000 or what ever the exact number is. As described the shot must have been akin to the apocryphal good illumination of a black cat in a coal cellar so there may be some poetic licence involved but nevertheless it may be worth considering. You could light the places with torches.

In fact using torches you may be able to lightpaint them with what you have and use an aperture that will put something into focus, though this is less of an issue with a wide lens unless focused close up.

Plan G would be something like this

http://www.spheron.com/en/sceneworks/portfolio/sce...

though I grant you that getting the kit in and out would be a tad more challenging than a 5D plus a lens.


ETA: Probably should have mentioned this as well.

http://www.spheron.com/en/sceneworks/downloads/new...

And that the kit does not come cheap ....

Edited by LongQ on Tuesday 2nd November 17:19

Lambochick

1,462 posts

247 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
Busa_Rush said:
I realise that but with such lenses the whole lens is larger so even when stopped down you get more light entering the front of the lens than you would with an f4 17-40 for example. Or is this too marginal to make any difference ?
F/4 is F/4, no matter how big the lens is. F/4 on a 14mm lens will let in exactly the same amount of light as F/4 on a 400mm lens, thats how it all works.

Simpo Two

92,766 posts

294 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
I must have been right then smile

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
I must have been right then smile
Yep! There are transmissive losses due to the glass elements being different and its this thats used in movie lenses but for photography within a small variance fx is fx regardless of focal length or maximum aperture.

Cabinet Enforcer

503 posts

255 months

Tuesday 2nd November 2010
quotequote all
Busa_Rush said:
Thanks, getting into these places myself is hard enough without getting a tripod down there too. Flash is difficult to use and if you go firing off a decent flash at people who's eyes have accustomed to a dark environment, you end up either having to give them 5 mins for the dots to disappear or dodge the rocks as they sling them at you for making them blind smile

I need a wider lens anyway, will look at Sigma, thanks.
I have the Sigma 20mm f1.8, it's a little soft wide open, and over budget if you want a new one. There are two on fleabay at the moment, second hand should be well inside budget.

The DOF issue isn't so bad due to the wide angle, set at hyperfocal distance will give a near point of about 12 feet, so pretty usable in large spaces if you take some care.