Probably a stupid question
Discussion
nickcowen said:
But I'm still learning and am new to photography.
I was trying to understand why a fixed 50mm lens is better and different then the kit lens that came with my camera if it where set to 50mm?? Be kind I'm sure it's a stupid question with a simple answer.
I'm assuming you are talking about a 50mm f/1.8 versus the typical 18-55. The advantage comes from the fact it is a 'faster' lens, that is to say the aperture can be opened all the way up to 1.8, much more than the kit lens. This allows much creative potential in terms of shallow depth of field shots (lots of background blur).I was trying to understand why a fixed 50mm lens is better and different then the kit lens that came with my camera if it where set to 50mm?? Be kind I'm sure it's a stupid question with a simple answer.
A couple of examples I took ages ago with the 50mm prime:


In addition, being a prime it is generally considered sharper than an equivalent zoom at the same focal distance.
nickcowen said:
I was trying to understand why a fixed 50mm lens is better and different then the kit lens that came with my camera if it where set to 50mm?? Be kind I'm sure it's a stupid question with a simple answer.
You may have been influenced by the 'nify-fifty' brigade. A 50mm is faster and sharper than yer average kit lens, but useless for anything remotely wide angle. The need for wide angle is generally more frequent than speed IMHO. Ideally have both, but if you haven't identified a need for a 50mm I wouldn't worry about it.Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



