What screen resolution
What screen resolution
Author
Discussion

Pies

Original Poster:

13,116 posts

285 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
I'm in process of re-working tvrsseries but before I do can you tell me what screen resolution you are using

TA

gifdy

2,078 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
1400 x 1050 on my laptop.

-kenny

sotonS2

14,709 posts

267 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
1024 x 768.

tvrgit

8,489 posts

281 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
sotonS2 said:
1024 x 768.


ditto

remember to make it compatible with non-microslop browsers! (It's ok at the moment, that wasn't a complaint!)

page3

5,190 posts

280 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
1280x1024 x 2 (spanned).

WildfireS3

9,947 posts

281 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
3200 x 1600

RichardR

2,907 posts

297 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
I'm using 1280x1024 but I'd recommend optimising it for 1024x768. That's normally enough screen real estate for most requirements, and doesn't penalise the reasonable number of people who can't yet achieve a higher resolution.

All IMHO of course!

Pies

Original Poster:

13,116 posts

285 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Blimey am I the only one using 800*600

WildfireS3

9,947 posts

281 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
I would go with 1024 x 768. I use 2 1600 x 1200 on twin 22" monitors, but most people will be compatible with 1024 x 768. Any chance of uploading the "Winter Words"??

sotonS2

14,709 posts

267 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Pies said:
Blimey am I the only one using 800*600


I do - but only on a scank laptop I use for wireless PHing at home.

Pies

Original Poster:

13,116 posts

285 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
WildfireS3 said:
. Any chance of uploading the "Winter Words"??


Done Cheers

I might tart it up at some point with a few piccys

CooperGreen

3,609 posts

265 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
1280 x 1024.
I am long sighted and like it small though.

oldred

3,764 posts

267 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
tvrgit said:

sotonS2 said:
1024 x 768.



ditto

remember to make it compatible with non-microslop browsers! (It's ok at the moment, that wasn't a complaint!)


ditto

page3

5,190 posts

280 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
...this thread is no good without photos

oatz

381 posts

279 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
IMHO most web designs should assume 800x600. Only a few years ago designers based page layouts on 640x480.

Tech marches on, however, I have found it's always good to design with the lowest expected settings in mind. That way people with 800x600 are happy and those of us with higher resolutions will get the benefit of having to scroll about less.