Is Manchester really in the North?
Is Manchester really in the North?
Author
Discussion

Windy Miller

Original Poster:

326 posts

244 months

Yesterday (18:55)
quotequote all
Why does this Andy Burnham bloke keep banging on about Manchester being 'North'?

On an England level, its just 10 miles from being halfway between Berwick upon Tweed and Southampton. On a UK level, the same UK he wants to be PM of, Manchester is closer to about half of France than it is to Muckle Flugga in Shetland. Where does he get this 'north' from? And on an England level, where does that put Carlisle, Newcastle, Berwick and umpteen other places that are much further north than Manchester?

Would have posted in the News, Politics and Economics thread, but it appears that 20 years of being on here is not enough to warrant access. In fact, I am not even a 1/3 of the way there. Should be able to get access in about 2067 when I will be 99. Strange forum rule.....

Hugo Stiglitz

41,107 posts

237 months

Yesterday (19:19)
quotequote all
By your reckoning that makes me home town in my home country of West Yorkshire as the same. Be gone heathen!

Super Sonic

13,489 posts

80 months

Yesterday (19:40)
quotequote all
North of Watford Gap.

Opapayer

1,922 posts

11 months

Yesterday (19:46)
quotequote all
Crewe is the cut off. Anything north of there is pretty much northern England. The North is effectively Northern England. Scotland is Scotland, Northern Ireland is Northern Ireland. Both of which are very northern geographically and both of which have devolved governments, so not really relevant to a discussion about the North of England

Windy Miller

Original Poster:

326 posts

244 months

Yesterday (20:06)
quotequote all
Though is it relevant, Scotland etc aside, if Manchester is within 10 miles of being as close to Southampton as it is Berwick upon Tweed? OK, there are more southern places than Southampton, yet not a lot further north than Berwick upon Tweed, I'll grant you. Manchester also manages to be just 71 miles from the Wikipedia defined "Geographical Centre of England", but yet, 158 miles from Berwick upon Tweed, near the Northern border.

Half of America seems to be called the Mid West. Should Manchester be in the Mid North(ish)? biggrin

m3jappa

6,910 posts

244 months

Yesterday (20:09)
quotequote all
Yes but those places further up are probably 'far north'

Sheepshanks

40,171 posts

145 months

Yesterday (20:17)
quotequote all
Being from NW England I always think it's odd when weather forecasters talk about the NW and point to West Scotland.

Opapayer

1,922 posts

11 months

Yesterday (20:19)
quotequote all
Windy Miller said:
Though is it relevant, Scotland etc aside, if Manchester is within 10 miles of being as close to Southampton as it is Berwick upon Tweed? OK, there are more southern places than Southampton, yet not a lot further north than Berwick upon Tweed, I'll grant you. Manchester also manages to be just 71 miles from the Wikipedia defined "Geographical Centre of England", but yet, 158 miles from Berwick upon Tweed, near the Northern border.

Half of America seems to be called the Mid West. Should Manchester be in the Mid North(ish)? biggrin
And again. Scotland and Northern Ireland already have developed governments with a lot of powers. What else do they need?

Is Burnham saying only Manchester? Or are people jumping on that as it’s where he is suggesting putting the HQ. He’s talking about devolving powers to all UK regions. However, no matter where it’s centred, if there is a “Northern No.10” then it’s going to be a damn sight nearer than Westminster for all of the northern cities and towns.

Doesitdrive

1,346 posts

7 months

Yesterday (20:27)
quotequote all
Don't argue about how North Manchester is, he promised growth for every postcode.

Didn't specify his idea of growth though lol, debt growth?