Firey GTR

[Blukoo]

Big Al. said:

Now posted later in thread.

No they're not. Can't you tell the difference between a Nissan GTR and an Audi RS3?
I can't believe the images have been fine for a week, and now you decide they have to be removed.

What about other photographers who watermark their pictures with their name and website.

I'll have you know that these were both shoots for friends too, so no-profit made at all.

Edited by Blukoo on Wednesday 20th February 13:00

[MGZRod]

Awesome, that is all

[Andy Bell]

i imagine if you want real pictures of cars on fire Aberdeen is the place to go?

[johnycarrera]

Fantastic, especially the second one.

[GrahamF430]

Andy Bell said:

i imagine if you want real pictures of cars on fire Aberdeen is the place to go?

I think Govan is quite good for that too.

[knightofni]

Brill, love those!!!!! Where do I get a flamethrower ;-)

[Blukoo]

MGZRod said:

Awesome, that is all

johnycarrera said:

Fantastic, especially the second one.

Thanks

knightofni said:

Brill, love those!!!!! Where do I get a flamethrower ;-)

Just set your friend on fire and make him run round the car. Same effect...

[MGZRod]

Without stating the obvious, how do you do this? Aside from setting stuff on fire.

[Blukoo]

MGZRod said:

Without stating the obvious, how do you do this? Aside from setting stuff on fire.

http://vanelderphotography.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/fire-wall-flame-on.html

[sir twig]

Nice one Murray, that looks epic!

[Blukoo]

Unusual that my second lot of pictures were removed because of my water mark.

The same watermark which is featured on the first pictures, and all my other pictures on this forum.

[Clubber330]

Blukoo said:

Unusual that my second lot of pictures were removed because of my water mark.

The same watermark which is featured on the first pictures, and all my other pictures on this forum.

Probably down to the fact its blatant advertising. simples

[Blukoo]

Not blatant advertising. I use that watermark on all my pictures.
It's just to save them being stolen.

Everyone who posts images like this in the photography forum uses watermarks.

Anyway, here are the pics without the watermarks...


IMG_0030_blue by Murray 1986, on Flickr


IMG_0050_B2 by Murray 1986, on Flickr


IMG_0057_B by Murray 1986, on Flickr

[Clubber330]

Well put some sort of symbol watermark, instead of your business name etc that way it wont get deleted.

[Big Al.]

Clubber330 said:

Well put some sort of symbol watermark, instead of your business name etc that way it wont get deleted.

I'm of the belief that, that would be acceptable.

[Blukoo]

Big Al. said:

Now posted later in thread.

No they're not. Can't you tell the difference between a Nissan GTR and an Audi RS3?
I can't believe the images have been fine for a week, and now you decide they have to be removed.

What about other photographers who watermark their pictures with their name and website.

I'll have you know that these were both shoots for friends too, so no-profit made at all.