Cams Cams Cams
Cams Cams Cams
Author
Discussion

B-Reight

Original Poster:

905 posts

232 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
I'm thinking about a winter upgrade for more powah, cause you can never have enough right?

As far as i'm aware my 390se is is currently running a Kent H214 according to the paperwork that came with the car, it seems a decent enough all rounder but peak power is a little too early for my liking at a little over 5k.

Has any one got any experience with the wilder cams like the Kent H224 or 234 or the Crower 50233?

Cheers
Ben

voltage_maxx

368 posts

239 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
Be super careful going for a wild cam in a road car. You can seriously affect the tractibility and driveability of the car.

If peak power is coming too early, it could well be that the engine doesn't have the ability to breathe well enough.
I'd be tempted to look at the spec of the rest of the engine, cylinder heads etc and see if you can improve the gasflow first.

Have you read David Hardcastle's book? http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tuning-Rover-Engines-Perfo...

Lots of very good advice in there, echoed by my old man who's built RV8's for competition in the past.

THE big mistake which everyone makes is fitting too wild a camshaft smile

Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

209 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
I fitted a Kent 248 with 112 lca

That's a fairly large cam

And I have no regrets,

It's not that good under 1500rpm but who drives that low?

And a pig to start when cold

Still pulling at 6500rpm

Ask your self this, are you using the car to poodle about in going to the shops? Or is it your weekend toy?

Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

209 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
That's the one but the lca was changed to widen the power band

It's in a 4.6,

pwd95

8,459 posts

268 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
Mine's described as a 234 in the J.E. build sheet. Max power at 6500rpm. Haven't been brave enough to 'hold it down' till 6500 yet but it screams past 6k like a banshee. Go for it I say. You might have to upgrade the followers, rockers & springs though.

carsy

3,019 posts

195 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
The Kent 214 is a very good useable cam for road use and was favoured by TVR in many engines. As you will know it does give a slightly lumpy tickover and is slightly lumpy low down but still perfectly useable for everyday use. How many miles has your present cam done? If it is getting worn it will feel as though it is running out of puff at the top end. If worn a new one will feel much more revvy at the top end.

I would think very hard before going too big. The last thing you want to do is loose your driveability low down.

eesbad

1,330 posts

232 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
voltage_maxx said:
THE big mistake which everyone makes is fitting too wild a camshaft smile
My tuppence worth...

Admittedly not an RV8, but in my X-flow Ford days I had a MK2 Cortina, which I fitted the wildest cam I could without machining pockets in the pistons, lightened flywheel, billet rockers, posts and solid spacers to rev to 7k. Tickover had to be set at 1200rpm or it would stall on idle. Nothing til 3500rpm then good grief until 7000rpm! Absolute hoot. The induction bark as the cam came on song just made you want to hear it again and again. Net result was a car that slowly became a PITA to use everyday - especially in traffic - and lows of 11mpg (with a 10 gallon tank!) meant you always had to know where to local petrol stations were.

So yes, I think you have to keep a practical head on when choosing a cam.

Having said that, I later ran the same setup in MK2 Escort, so I guess that says a lot about me! wobble

rev-erend

21,624 posts

314 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
For a 248 cam - you will need solid lifters and either adjustable rods or adjustable tappets.. look for kenne bell or yella terra. Both very hard to find nowadays. Next big issue is EFI.

If you have a flapper 4cu then tuning it may be next to impossible, hotwire and 14cux is possible but will need careful tuning to gain back driveability by the guru - Mark Adams.

My 4.6 was a 248 solid .. with KB roller rockers.

With my new engine - I've gone a bit wilder.. 256 by crane using pep roller rockers.

Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

209 months

Tuesday 18th October 2011
quotequote all
What power and ftlbs did you get from the 4.6? And what was the rest of the spec?

Sorry for off topic

voltage_maxx

368 posts

239 months

Wednesday 19th October 2011
quotequote all
B-Reight said:
eesbad said:
My tuppence worth...

Admittedly not an RV8, but in my X-flow Ford days I had a MK2 Cortina, which I fitted the wildest cam I could without machining pockets in the pistons, lightened flywheel, billet rockers, posts and solid spacers to rev to 7k. Tickover had to be set at 1200rpm or it would stall on idle. Nothing til 3500rpm then good grief until 7000rpm! Absolute hoot. The induction bark as the cam came on song just made you want to hear it again and again. Net result was a car that slowly became a PITA to use everyday - especially in traffic - and lows of 11mpg (with a 10 gallon tank!) meant you always had to know where to local petrol stations were.

So yes, I think you have to keep a practical head on when choosing a cam.

Having said that, I later ran the same setup in MK2 Escort, so I guess that says a lot about me! wobble
I just need to establish what setup would be just wild enough without ruining the driveability, i know i need wilder, but not sure what cam would give me the sweet spot.

Of course i'll need to balance that out against £££ as i don't want to be updrating the bottom end, so a 6k ish limit might be wise.

eta;

6k rpm not £6k, SWMBO would flay me alive if i spent that laugh




Edited by B-Reight on Tuesday 18th October 23:16
6.5k RPM used BRIEFLY will be fine with standard components. Big issue can be lubrication of the top end. Dad's old rallying stag with a 3.5 ended up breaking its camshaft as a result of inadequate top end lubrication at high RPM. The trick apparently is drilling two oil feed holes at the end of the lifter gallery.

What capacity engine are you running? Again, I would strongly suggest you look at better flowed heads, intake etc. You'll be facing big bills uprating internal components to rev reliably and consistently past 6k RPM. It's really not the route I'd go unless I was looking at pure competition.

rev-erend

21,624 posts

314 months

Wednesday 19th October 2011
quotequote all
Good point above.

The older RV8 does not like high revs and has a design flaw in the oil drive from the dizzy ..

Also - do the injectors (19lbs - I think) have the required capacity for the bhp expected or are they maxed out.

Wedg1e

27,041 posts

295 months

Wednesday 19th October 2011
quotequote all
My 390SE's cam's an RPI RP1. Was in the engine when I got it, replaced at about 80K miles I think (now on 120K).
Has duplex timing chain and adjustable sprocket, still runs hydraulic lifters.
Gives a flattish curve, no sudden rush at any RPM either from seat of pants or dyno graph:



Edited by Wedg1e on Wednesday 19th October 13:14

GV

2,366 posts

254 months

Wednesday 19th October 2011
quotequote all
fk the Cam - just get a bigger engine...!!

pwd95

8,459 posts

268 months

Wednesday 19th October 2011
quotequote all
GV said:
fk the Cam - just get a bigger engine...!!
That too. biggrin ... yes


Chilliman

12,433 posts

191 months

Wednesday 19th October 2011
quotequote all
Speak to the experts.... try V8 Developments in Lincolnshire, massive RV8 experience and will point you in the right direction. Could save you alot of unwisely spent money in the long run.....


no i'm not on commission