Fluke...
Author
Discussion

Wedg1e

Original Poster:

27,011 posts

288 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
When I rebuilt the rear suspension I fitted all new bonded rubber bushes, UJs, wheel bearings and brake discs... so I had to shim the discs to centre them in the calipers. Then I had to shim the driveshafts to set the rear wheel negative camber, but as the old shims were so rusty it was hard to get an accurate thickness of the stack, so I waved a finger in the air and shoved in a random number of shims on each side.
I knew once the car had an MOT I'd have to set up the camber sharpish (or get someone else to do it, which is like having unlimited access to Rachel Riley and sending your grandad instead biggrin).
As luck would have it Aldi were having a clearance of a last week's bargain tools so just for a laugh (and 12 quid) I bagged a digital spirit level. It was the work of a few minutes in the metrology lab at work to prove that it's actually a sight more accurate than I expected it to be, so with the aid of an offcut of alloy angle across the wheel rims I recorded these results:





Not a bad guesstimate although it does mean the left-hand tyre scrubs the wheelarch over bumps.

So I jacked the back end up, whipped the wheels off and dropped a couple of shims out of each side... then it was time for tea, so I need to drive the car around the block to settle everything before I recheck it.

adam quantrill

11,627 posts

265 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Neat - bring it to the fest!

P.S. Fluke are normally multimeters aren't they? ;^)

pb450

1,305 posts

183 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Is it me or is that second wheel only 9.68 degrees from horizontal?? laugh

mrzigazaga

18,762 posts

188 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
adam quantrill said:
Neat - bring it to the fest!
+1