A METRO thats quicker than a wedge...
A METRO thats quicker than a wedge...
Author
Discussion

l33

Original Poster:

3,469 posts

253 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
Yep - you read right:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/MG-Metro-6R4-Wo

Wonder how much this'll fetch?

Still prefer the Wedge though

chassis 33

6,194 posts

311 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
A 350 or 400 Wedge???

Regards
Iain

jmorgan

36,010 posts

313 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
Weren't they extremely quick off the mark? Anyhow, I have posh polish. Slips through the air quicker..........

mightymouse

1,438 posts

257 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
I would really luuuuuuuuuuuuuve one of those.

jchase

572 posts

288 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
I had a race with a metro turbo once, in my 280i. The metro was still pulling away from me at over 120 - I was a bit shocked, so i did some research - they hold some pretty respectable lap times at Mallory park, faster than the tasmin race boys, IIRC.

-Jim

FrenchTVR

1,844 posts

296 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
IIRC the "real" 6R4 didn't have a Rover V8, it was fitted with a four-cam, 24-valve, normally aspirated 3-litre V6, hence the 6(cylinders)R(rear engine)4(whel drive) monicker.

Looks like this




Edited to add picture


Edited by FrenchTVR on Friday 11th August 13:22

toltec

7,179 posts

252 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
I remember reading that the engine was developed fom the V8 - they started by chopping two cylinders off. Might not be true though as I probably saw it on a web site.

L1OFF

3,771 posts

285 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
Same engine (IIRC) as the Jag XJ220

Alan

FrenchTVR

1,844 posts

296 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
toltec said:
I remember reading that the engine was developed fom the V8 - they started by chopping two cylinders off. Might not be true though as I probably saw it on a web site.


Early development was split between the RV8 and the Honda V6.

FrenchTVR

1,844 posts

296 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
L1OFF said:
Same engine (IIRC) as the Jag XJ220

Alan


I think you are correct there.

350zwelgje

1,820 posts

290 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
Think I have seen one converted to RV8: even more asome beast, and the noise.... like a RV8 wedge.

Rob

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
Did they really build a 12v version? I've looked at quite a few and they have all been 24v and look very differnt to that one in the engine bay. There are quite a few non original copies built for rallying using metro shells with a spaceframe welded in underneath and using v6 and v8 motors...

The 6R4 is another motor i've got close to buying a few times... a usable one should be 25-35k for a fresh rebuild full spec your easy looking at 100k


G

trackcar

6,453 posts

255 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
700 miles from new? with that engine bay? it looks like a 100,000 mile motorway hack to me.
It may well be perfectly legit, but there's something that doesn't "feel" quite right about it ...

FrenchTVR

1,844 posts

296 months

Friday 11th August 2006
quotequote all
trackcar said:
700 miles from new? with that engine bay? it looks like a 100,000 mile motorway hack to me.
It may well be perfectly legit, but there's something that doesn't "feel" quite right about it ...


With you on that one Joolz, and if it is original, why the hell are you selling it on eBay?

convert

3,757 posts

247 months

Saturday 12th August 2006
quotequote all
Once had a passenger ride in a 6R4 at Silverstone.

It was a 2.8 V6, with twin superchargers (Fleming thermodynamics if I remember correctly). It was running on slicks. I've never been in a car that cornered so fast, the G forces were amazing.

I think you're right about them all being 24v though, this one doesn't seem proper.

old64er

1,388 posts

267 months

Sunday 13th August 2006
quotequote all
This looks like a development mule with a cut down rover V8 that's dry sumped.I did'nt think any of these cars survived.

Its possible that it is a genuine car and if it is, it would be much rarer than the V64V engined originals.
All the V64V engined cars were 24 valve design hence the naming.

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Monday 14th August 2006
quotequote all
FrenchTVR said:
trackcar said:
700 miles from new? with that engine bay? it looks like a 100,000 mile motorway hack to me.
It may well be perfectly legit, but there's something that doesn't "feel" quite right about it ...


With you on that one Joolz, and if it is original, why the hell are you selling it on eBay?


There was a nice well documented one that went on ebay not so long ago... much nicer than that went for mid 30's which was less than i thought it would