SH Coilovers
SH Coilovers
Author
Discussion

GV

Original Poster:

2,366 posts

254 months

Monday 3rd August 2009
quotequote all
Anyone driving on a full set. I've sorted out the front issues and have Armstrongs on the rear which were always going to be a temp solution. Just wondered if anyone else has any other suggestions or comments.

My initial reaction since replacing the Konis with the front coilovers is that the ride is more harsher and a bit bouncy. Would that change with a full set of coilovers on the rear...??

Big Daft Lad

1,386 posts

217 months

Monday 3rd August 2009
quotequote all
I don't know if they are any good but I've been considering a pair of these. At £65 a go it would be rude not to try them, no?



Edited by Big Daft Lad on Monday 3rd August 21:24

GV

Original Poster:

2,366 posts

254 months

Tuesday 4th August 2009
quotequote all
Interesting that they don't come with springs - how would we go about trying to find out which springs to go for? I want springs aimed towards comfort rather than teeth crunching track day specials...

blueone

133 posts

253 months

Tuesday 4th August 2009
quotequote all
Fitted to the rear of my 350. Much improved the ride and you can adjust over the full range from very soft to need a new set of bones. Tried both settled somewhere in the middle actually exactly on the mid point of the adjustment.

The improved ride may have been due to the old ones being original but from a personal point of view defiantly worth the money and Steve’s after sales is second to none if you have any problems fitting them.

snookes

262 posts

313 months

Tuesday 4th August 2009
quotequote all
i had sh coilovers fitted to the front of my 400 along with sh arb droplinks they were much better than what was on before. but it showed how poor the backs were so had the rears changed to sh coilovers and much better! the fronts i have got set on 21 (think thats about half way) and the rears are set to about 6 or 7

hope that helps

anthony

GV

Original Poster:

2,366 posts

254 months

Tuesday 4th August 2009
quotequote all
[quote=snookes]i had sh coilovers fitted to the front of my 400 along with sh arb droplinks they were much better than what was on before. but it showed how poor the backs were so had the rears changed to sh coilovers and much better! the fronts i have got set on 21 (think thats about half way) and the rears are set to about 6 or 7

hope that helps

I was hoping you'd say that! I just need a bit of convincing. My own view is that I think the front springs need to be 2 inches longer. Despite reducing the distance between the upper and lower mounts by 8 inches which is way in excess of the previous mounting point - the front springs are still almost bound together and are nowhere near the same level as those featured on another car with the same setup featured elsewhere on these pages...

shpub

8,507 posts

302 months

Tuesday 4th August 2009
quotequote all
Andy

If the platform is too high then the springs will become coil bound because the spring is effectively compressed between the top of the shock and the platform. This means that when the car's weight is on the spring, it cannot compress as it should and goes coil bound.

Undo the platform so that it is just holding the spring in place when the suspension is in full droop. The car should now settle with the shock/spring in the middle. If it is coil bound, then your car will need a higher rated spring.

GV

Original Poster:

2,366 posts

254 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
Thanks Steve - I will try that this weekend.

jon haines

960 posts

276 months

Friday 7th August 2009
quotequote all
does anyone have an opinion on the pros & cons of sh coilovers against rt racing coilovers, price,ease of fitting and performance.

grahamw48

9,944 posts

268 months

Friday 7th August 2009
quotequote all
I have RTracing Redlines on my car (and on my previous 280). Unfortunately I'm probably too rubbish a driver to notice any difference. They are easy to adjust though. smile

This car drives very smoothly and quietly on all surfaces with not much wallowing.

The 280FHC was like driving inside an upturned skip on wooden wheels. hehe

Edited by grahamw48 on Friday 7th August 10:01

GV

Original Poster:

2,366 posts

254 months

Friday 7th August 2009
quotequote all
Didn't know RT did coilovers....

combine

3,114 posts

259 months

Friday 7th August 2009
quotequote all
Need to look into this as I have standard springs on front and platform coilovers on back , thinking of doing coilovers with platforms on front , don't they need plates to strenghen the top woishbones ?

grahamw48

9,944 posts

268 months

Friday 7th August 2009
quotequote all
The 400 has Redlines (adj platform) only on the rear, with original springs over the top of them. Fronts...not sure, but they work.

On the 280 I had both back and front replaced with Redlines and new springs, bushes, etc, etc. I know it cost 1800 quid. eek

GV

Original Poster:

2,366 posts

254 months

Friday 7th August 2009
quotequote all
If you are considering the coilover route regardless of who is the supplier - check the condition of the upper mounts first...