Evo Magazin 2002 December
Evo Magazin 2002 December
Author
Discussion

TVR TYPHON

Original Poster:

100 posts

269 months

Saturday 22nd May 2004
quotequote all
Has anybody the Evo Magazin from the 2002 December? There was a comparison between the: Murcielago VS AMG SL55 Vs AM Vanquish Vs Pagani Zonda Vs TVR Cerbera Vs Ferrari 575M Vs Porsche 911Turbo. Who wins? Can anybody scan it? How was the TVR performance between the other cars, 0-60, 0-100, etc. and the performance time of the others. Wich cars has the best performance? please help

>>> Edited by TVR TYPHON on Saturday 22 May 21:40

TVR TYPHON

Original Poster:

100 posts

269 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
Can anybody scan it

Bodo

12,584 posts

295 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
Hi, drop me a line via my profile, I may be able to help you.

mrs fish

30,018 posts

287 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
I have it, but I won't be able to scan it till tomorrow when I get back to work.

mrs fish

30,018 posts

287 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
Looking through it though I can't see the comparisons you have asked for

racketman

1,940 posts

275 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
it was top gear magazine.

the cerbera was, i think, 3rd fastest to 150 just behind the lambo or on a par with it.the zonda was about 2-3 seconds faster and the porker(power kit i think) was just a bit slower than the cerbera.

Supersonic

1,163 posts

291 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
Yep, it was Top Gear:

0-60mph

Vanquish: 5.3secs
SL 55: 4.6secs
Murcielago: 3.6secs
Zonda: 4.0secs
575: 4.3secs
Cerb 4.5 Red Rose: 4.0secs
911TT X50: 4.1secs

0-100mph

Vanquish: 11.1secs
SL 55: 10.0secs
Murcielago: 8.8secs
Zonda: 8.0secs
575: 9.5secs
Cerb 4.5 Red Rose: 9.0secs
911TT X50: 9.2secs

0-150mph

Vanquish: 5.3secs
SL 55: 23.1secs
Murcielago: 19.5secs
Zonda: 17.0secs
575: 21.3secs
Cerb 4.5 Red Rose: 19.8secs
911TT X50: 20.5secs

Track:

Vanquish: 1 min 31.6secs
SL 55: 1 min 29.3secs
Murcielago: 1 min 26.2secs
Zonda: 1 min 24.5secs
575: 1 min 30.9secs
Cerb 4.5 Red Rose: 1 min 30.8secs
911TT X50: DNF

TVR TYPHON

Original Poster:

100 posts

269 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
i think the normaly tvr cerbera 4.5 does 0-100 in 8.5 sec. look here:www.tvrdeutschland.de/ The Red Rose can make 0-100 in 8.3 sec or better i think. look here: normally TVR Cerbera 4.5 Look at this 0-100 time. FAST LIKE THE ZONDA:www.cerbera.co.uk/cerbera/roadtestcomp.htm this car can suck the murcielago WOW! But why is this car on the track so slow?? this car is the lightest is dont understand! ok the murcielago has AWD but the SL55AMG is FAster????? Is that the technical features like abs, esp, abc, something like that. What happend to the porsche!?!?!

EddyB

172 posts

268 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
It is possible that a Cerbera might not be able to keep up, it can happen!

Plus, it only takes a second to re-read your posts and edit them so it's actually possible to decipher where all your (somewhat random) questions are located...

>> Edited by EddyB on Sunday 23 May 15:50

donatien

1,113 posts

287 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
Typhon, maybe it is what best for you to actually try a TVR you find it fast. Oh yes and it do 200 parsecs per cornflake with 5kg mass and 2,000 horsepower. Surely much more is faster than......

ah F*ck it. I give up

tubbystu

3,846 posts

289 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
EddyB said:


Plus, it only takes a second to re-read your posts and edit them so it's actually possible to decipher where all your (somewhat random) questions are located...

>> Edited by EddyB on Sunday 23 May 15:50