TVR in Formula 1
Author
Discussion

skiver

Original Poster:

658 posts

222 months

Sunday 6th January 2013
quotequote all
Just a thought on a wet Sunday afternoon; how far back in Formula 1 history would you need to go before one of the fastest TVR's, in standard form, would be competitive on the grid?

V8 GRF

7,299 posts

239 months

Sunday 6th January 2013
quotequote all
I'd be guessing mid/late '50s when they were still front engined?

bionicjim

473 posts

168 months

Sunday 6th January 2013
quotequote all
Just a few months for mine lol
Against Hamilton and all the brake downs ha ha ha

Brummmie

5,284 posts

250 months

Sunday 6th January 2013
quotequote all
1753...

RichB

56,213 posts

313 months

Sunday 6th January 2013
quotequote all
Brummmie said:
1753...
What 7 mins ago? Crikey!

DonkeyApple

69,605 posts

198 months

Sunday 6th January 2013
quotequote all
skiver said:
Just a thought on a wet Sunday afternoon; how far back in Formula 1 history would you need to go before one of the fastest TVR's, in standard form, would be competitive on the grid?
You mean a TVR today versus F1 grid in 19xx?

Jasper Gilder

2,166 posts

302 months

Sunday 6th January 2013
quotequote all
I'd guess mid '60s - remember F1 was only 1500cc from 1961-1965

crosseyedlion

2,381 posts

227 months

Sunday 6th January 2013
quotequote all
Biggest influence will be the improvements in tyre technology. It's got to be before slicks and aero (late 1960's?)

AutoAndy

2,270 posts

244 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
It was in 2012 - one off at Spa...spot the difference:





...my version taken at the Spa Classic 2012

V8 GRF

7,299 posts

239 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Jasper Gilder said:
I'd guess mid '60s - remember F1 was only 1500cc from 1961-1965
Yes but I'd imagine even a 1500cc single seater will annilate a roadcar round a racetrack?

skiver

Original Poster:

658 posts

222 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
V8 GRF said:
Yes but I'd imagine even a 1500cc single seater will annilate a roadcar round a racetrack?
I agree, I had 10 laps around Silverstone's Stowe circuit in a Formula Ford years ago which lapped much faster than I could have done in the Griff I had at the time, mainly down to roadholding.

TA14

14,332 posts

287 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
I suppose that you could compare the lap times for the first F1 race at Silverstone and see how they compare with Tuscan race series times; then make nominal adjustments.

TVR500Morgan

1,183 posts

181 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Having looked after quite a few historic grand prix cars, with the exeption maybe of a tuscan challenge car, no road going TVR would come close in overall lap time. You'd be amazed how quick the early GP cars are. I looked after a 1936 ERA grand prix car at Goodwood FoS last year and it was quicker up the hill that most of the modern cars (bar Le Mans prototypes, F1, and pike peak cars)

Chilliman

12,419 posts

190 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
skiver said:
Just a thought on a wet Sunday afternoon; how far back in Formula 1 history would you need to go before one of the fastest TVR's, in standard form, would be competitive on the grid?
Complete guess, but I imagine if you could get the lap time for a Sag (quickest out the box Tiv?) on a circuit that hadn't changed since the 50's or 60's then you might be able to get a comparison....

Saw a programme some time back (might have been Top Gear) where they ran a top spec 80's factory rally Audi quattro against an off the shelf contemporary Scooby or Evo that the missus takes to Tesco's and it left the 80's championship rally winning car for dead frown

In some ways I find it quite scary that any incompetent fool with enough cash can buy a car that is dangerously fast... simply by passing a driving test that is geared to percentage pass not skill or ability...

But then I'm a grumpy old barsteward that probably lives in the past frown

V8 GRF

7,299 posts

239 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Chilliman said:
Post about rallycar comparisons
That's a different comparison to a single seater V Roadcar. They really are chalk and cheese.

DonkeyApple

69,605 posts

198 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
TA14 said:
I suppose that you could compare the lap times for the first F1 race at Silverstone and see how they compare with Tuscan race series times; then make nominal adjustments.
The trouble is that the circuit has changed massively over the years. Corners, complexes, cambers, grip etc etc.

I guess you could look at a section of another circuit which hasn't changed as much, preferably one with mostly corners as I suspect it is cornering speeds the largest difference will lie?


PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

311 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Jasper Gilder said:
I'd guess mid '60s - remember F1 was only 1500cc from 1961-1965
The 1980's turbocharged F1s were only 1500ccs too smile

Edmundo2

1,440 posts

239 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
skiver said:
Just a thought on a wet Sunday afternoon; how far back in Formula 1 history would you need to go before one of the fastest TVR's, in standard form, would be competitive on the grid?
A long way back I would guess.

Have a look at some of the hillclimb times to get an idea. I owned a griff500 with a really strong rebuilt motor in it and uprated shocks etc and thought it was pretty quick. I then sold it and bought a 1370cc GSXR engined Jedi single seater to go hillclimbing in which is pretty old fasioned technology in that it's a basic tubular space frame with simple wishbone/coil over suspension and a small high reving engine on carbs bolted into the back, ( admittedly it has slicks and wings on it + is v.light ). The difference in performance is huge - night and day! To put it into perspective the jedi is much quicker than stripped out 700bhp + evos, 430 scuderias, gt3s,any TVR you care to think of. An 1100cc Jedi holds the outright lap record around Cadwell Park,( quicker than any other car or Leon Haslam on a superbike! ). The reason is simply the lack of weight that needs to be stopped, turned, propelled etc + a very low centre of gravity + small size/footprint which makes it very agile/nimble and easy to place on the track.People talk about caterhams etc being responsive/direct etc but any single seater is another step again.

A jedi is not an old f1 car I know but it suggests to me that you would need to be pitching a Sag at someting like an early 60's rear engined cooper or lotus. Anything later/64 ish onwards and I think wider tyres/bigger power/early aero would win the battle?