New V8 TVR?
Author
Discussion

ukbob

Original Poster:

16,277 posts

294 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2004
quotequote all
The speed 6 - it seems to be in all new TVR's, and clearly isnt and doesnt sound like a V8.

Im not very knowlegable re: engine related matters, but did someone once say the reason was because emission regulations were more easily met with a V6 than a V8?? Is that why none of the new TVR's have a V8?

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

290 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2004
quotequote all
Bob, they don't have a V6 either!

ukbob

Original Poster:

16,277 posts

294 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2004
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
Bob, they don't have a V6 either!


straight 6 then Been hanging in the S forum too much

kevinday

13,810 posts

309 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2004
quotequote all
AFAIK the Rover V8 was dropped because it would cost too much to convert it to be ecologically friendly and powerful. Other V8s are eco friendly but were designed 40 years after the RV8.

Tripps

5,814 posts

301 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2004
quotequote all
IRC it was mainly because the RV8 and AJP V8 were both two valve per cylinder units, this (for technical reasons...) means higher emissions, although if I recall either the Ford or Corvette V8 block is also - but does pass worldwide emissions tests

The RV8 was designed before emissions even existed and the AJP was designed as a race engine, so the emissions weren't so much of a problem.

The S6 has four valves per cylinder, and I beleive its emission levels are low enough for worldwide domination!

UKbob

Original Poster:

16,277 posts

294 months

Thursday 23rd September 2004
quotequote all
Is there any chance new TVR's might come with a V8 as factory standard? Ever? Might NS have reason to push in this direction?

matthewbinns

18,506 posts

276 months

Thursday 23rd September 2004
quotequote all
Tripps said:
The S6 has four valves per cylinder, and I beleive its emission levels are low enough for worldwide domination!


An engine in a crate awaiting a rebuild doesnt generate much in the way of emissions

J_S_G

6,177 posts

279 months

Thursday 23rd September 2004
quotequote all
ukbob said:
The speed 6 - it seems to be in all new TVR's, and clearly isnt and doesnt sound like a V8.

Im not very knowlegable re: engine related matters, but did someone once say the reason was because emission regulations were more easily met with a V6 than a V8?? Is that why none of the new TVR's have a V8?

S6 is much cheaper to make than the AJP by all accounts I've heard. And the AJP is lousy on emissions. In comparison, my S6 is de-catted and should, I'm told by TVR, still get through the emissions test with its new ECU in

Straight 6 vs. V8 shouldn't really have a major difference in emissions, all other things (i.e. petrol consumption, etc.) being equal. Power delivery and character is different, though. Most V8s need balancing, meaning worse throttle response, whereas a straight 6 is naturally balanced. The AJP is a bit different cos of its design (75 degree and crank), mind...

And if you don't think an S6 sounds like a V8, you should hear my Tusc; even at idle it's got a lovely bu-bu-bu-bu-bu-bu-bu noise now (took a bit of time and money to get it that way, nind). Not as nice a Griff yet, but as nice as a Cerb in my opinion.

andytk

1,558 posts

295 months

Thursday 23rd September 2004
quotequote all
J_S_G said:

[quote=ukbob]

whereas a straight 6 is naturally balanced. The AJP is a bit different cos of its design (75 degree and crank), mind...


Are you kidding?? The Speed Six balanced? Its shakier than a rampant rabbit.
See that big black round thing on the front of the crank, thats a viscous damper, that is.

This is needed cos otherwise the engine would shake the car to pieces at idle.

Andy

joospeed

4,473 posts

307 months

Thursday 23rd September 2004
quotequote all
the first engines didn't have the TVD and the cranks broke .. cue much cutting of chassis to accomodate the later cranks and dampers. Seems it may have been a symptom of tvr going from steel to iron cranks? ..

trooper1212

9,457 posts

281 months

Thursday 23rd September 2004
quotequote all
andytk said:

See that big black round thing on the front of the crank, thats a viscous damper, that is.




Otherwise known as a big bastard weight

the dodger

2,376 posts

292 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
Hmmm. Maybe they got the firing order wrong because a straight six should be naturally balanced.

Wonder why it's so bad? -

j_s_g

6,177 posts

279 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
andytk said:

Are you kidding?? The Speed Six balanced? Its shakier than a rampant rabbit.
See that big black round thing on the front of the crank, thats a viscous damper, that is.

This is needed cos otherwise the engine would shake the car to pieces at idle.

"a straight 6" is naturally balanced. Now, "TVR's straight six" might not be. That's something entirely different.

blueyes

4,799 posts

281 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
the dodger said:
Hmmm. Maybe they got the firing order wrong because a straight six should be naturally balanced.

Wonder why it's so bad? -


I THINK it's something to do with it having a flat plane crank. The firing order is different which means they can get more power out of it.... but I'm probably wrong.... I just remember somebody saying something about it.

anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
I was going to say that. The SP6 IIRC does have a flat plane crank. Hence why it doesn't sound as smooth, or nice as a standard straight six.

the dodger

2,376 posts

292 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
So is the Speed Six one bank of a Speed Twelve in turn a 12cyl version of the AJP V8? I'm sure there's a connection there.......and to the Judd F1 engine.

Flat plane crank would certainly explain the irregular beat/unbalanced vibrations - probably worse than in a 'V'.

WilliamBall

4,745 posts

311 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
A flat plane crank in s straight 6! [is there a smiley for slapping forehead with palm of hand in despair]

The AJP V8 has a flat plane crank. This means when you lay it on a bench it's flat - i.e.none of the big ends are other than 180 degees from one another, so 4 are 'up' and 4 are 'down'.

Split between the 2 banks of a V8 this means 2 pistons are up and 2 are down in each bank - so each bank works like a regular in-line 4. OK so far? However, with a flat plane crank and the V at 75 degrees, the 'up' and 'down' of each piston 'pair' in each bank is 75 degees out relatively. So imagine 2 conventional 4 cylinder lumps running together, but with top dead centre being 75 degrees out of phase on each bank.

Most V8s (Rover, Chevy, Ford) aren't like this, and the pistons (and firing) is equal over all banks i.e. 8 pretty even 'bangs' for every 2 revolutions. In order to achive this, the big ends aren't all just 180 degrees out, but are 90 degrees out (or offset depending on the V), so the crank isn't 'flat' - i.e. if you lie it on a bench some of the big end bearings will stick up.

The advantage of the flat plane is that each bank of 4 runs like a separate 4 cylinder engine to take advantage of exhaust tuning for scavenge...equal shockwaves for each 'bank', with each bank running its own 4-2-1 exhaust.

A flat plane crank in a straight 6? Let me see now. That would mean 3 pistons up and 3 pistons down hmm? Interesting concept. Each 180 degrees we get alternately 2 and 1 piston firing. Or maybe we run 2 pistons up and 4 down...hell if folks don't think the S6 is smooth maybe it's really running all 6 pistons up and down together. A flat plane crank could certainly handle that!

OK, the Laverda Jota 3 cylinder engine ran 2-up and 1-down which gave it a funky beat!

Unless I am mistaken, I think you will find a flat plane crank only makes sense on V8s...or inline 4 cylinder engine (which naturally have flat plane cranks).

WB

mongoose

4,360 posts

284 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
Tripps said:


The S6 has four valves per cylinder, and I beleive its emission levels are low enough for worldwide domination!
according to a newly aquainted factory trained independant source of mine,this engine probably,more than likely,wont be able to satisfy the emmisions regs much longer either.so what next?

donatien

1,113 posts

287 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
There was also a rumour that Peter Wheeler didn't want anything German in the cars - which would have happened when BMW took over Rover. Not sure if that affected ownership of the V8 though.

PetrolTed

34,468 posts

332 months

Saturday 25th September 2004
quotequote all
Great explanation Willie, thanks for that. Had never really got my head around it until now.

I was told by someone that should know () that the 2006 emissions regulations will require some strangling of the S6.