Hold on lads, Ive got an idea...
Hold on lads, Ive got an idea...
Author
Discussion

DJC

Original Poster:

23,563 posts

265 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
Any of you fine people seen this week's Autocar? Oh you have? Excellent, then Im fairly sure you read a certain article and all had the same thought as me!

Namely, that is if Radical can join 2 Busa 175bhp engines to produce a 2.6ltr V8 shoving out 383bhp/207ft torque, then how about a 5.2ltr V16 shoving out 760BHP/400ft torque?

Now come on, dont tell me I was the only person thinking along those lines???

900T-R

20,406 posts

286 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
And then the 15,000 mile rebuild intervals will finally become official...

fly boy

1,282 posts

270 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
How about a 7.2 V12 around 700bhp from a coupling of existing tvr engines.
While you're at it you could change the chocolate finger followers...

DJC

Original Poster:

23,563 posts

265 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
fly boy said:
How about a 7.2 V12 around 700bhp from a coupling of existing tvr engines.
While you're at it you could change the chocolate finger followers...


Hey, Ive never been a fan of this "too powerful for the road" stuff. Let em rip I say

jayjay

470 posts

273 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all

It was called the Speed 12.

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

277 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
Too much is never enough!

rev-erend

21,619 posts

313 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
what's the point .. we are only allowed to do 70.. means you would get there in about 2.1 secs

fly boy

1,282 posts

270 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
rev-erend said:
what's the point .. we are only allowed to do 70.. means you would get there in about 2.1 secs

and your point is

900T-R

20,406 posts

286 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
rev-erend said:
what's the point .. we are only allowed to do 70.. means you would get there in about 2.1 secs


...back end first...

DJC

Original Poster:

23,563 posts

265 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
jayjay said:

It was called the Speed 12.



far as Im concerned that makes a perfect family of cars...

Speed 6
Speed 12
Speed 16

Woohoo!

Fly Boy

1,282 posts

270 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
DJC said:

far as Im concerned that makes a perfect family of cars...

Speed 6
Speed 12
Speed 16

Woohoo!


Speed 16, now thats a thought
think 2 LS6's together, ooohh

DJC

Original Poster:

23,563 posts

265 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
Fly Boy said:

DJC said:

far as Im concerned that makes a perfect family of cars...

Speed 6
Speed 12
Speed 16

Woohoo!



Speed 16, now thats a thought
think 2 LS6's together, ooohh


Yes, that was kinda my point, joining the 2 V8 units together.

jsr

1,155 posts

279 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
I started thinking about a X16 the other day, angling 2 V8's apart from each other like this...

_/_

Wonder if it could ever be done?

Uriel

3,244 posts

280 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
fly boy said:
How about a 7.2 V12 around 700bhp from a coupling of existing tvr engines.
While you're at it you could change the chocolate finger followers...


What exactly are finger followers? Is it some name that TVR have made up because the only time I ever hear them mentioned is when people are discussing a Speed 6. From discussions I assume they're part of the valve train or related to it. Valve guides or something like that?

R666 TUS

1,052 posts

269 months

Friday 7th January 2005
quotequote all
I think 2 V8's has already been done it's
called a W16.

Col
[IMG]http://img155.exs.cx/img155/7877/bugattiengine3hk.jpg[/IMG]

1001 bhp bugatti veyron engine

>> Edited by R666 TUS on Friday 7th January 23:29