Fuel tank level and performance
Fuel tank level and performance
Author
Discussion

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Thursday 31st March 2016
quotequote all
Chaps,

Maybe this has been discussed before but putting the obvious weight increase of a full tank aside, I notice a huge difference in performance in my Chim when at 1/4 tank. In fact its a marked difference from even 3/4 or 1/2 full?? As soon as it sits at around 1/4 its a different car.

Fuel filter recently changed and all injectors cleaned....anyone any ideas could it be a pressure issue, pump, regulator?

I'd expect a difference when full but not this much.




QBee

22,130 posts

167 months

Thursday 31st March 2016
quotequote all
Explain in more detail what you are saying - more performance, better handling ?

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Thursday 31st March 2016
quotequote all

Acceleration...torque...from any rev range ...its literally night and day. Theres a straight and a few bends on a country road near me that I always have a blast down from point to point, just a whole different experience today from two days ago. Its not just this occasion I notice it every time which is why I'm thinking there maybe something more to it than just weight of fuel.



andy43

12,585 posts

277 months

Thursday 31st March 2016
quotequote all
When a full tank's been left for a bit, the lower octane stuff falls to the bottom and the higher octane rises to the top.
So when you've used the bottom 3/4 of a tank, you hit the good stuff and performance improves.




This may not be true

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Thursday 31st March 2016
quotequote all
I use it as a daily runner and its filled regularly so its rarely left long enough for any seperation to occur.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

248 months

Thursday 31st March 2016
quotequote all
You're probably overfilling the tank and flooding the breather and carbon canister. Therefore not enough air is making its way back into the tank so your pump is trying to suck on a vacuum. By the time the tank is down to a 1/4 the carbon canister is probably free of fuel again and letting enough air back into the tank. The pump is then not trying to suck on a vacuum and is able to deliver the full flow rate.

You should replace the carbon canister, check the breather pipe routing, and make sure you never fill the tank past the first click/auto-stop on the petrol pump.

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Thursday 31st March 2016
quotequote all
You could have something there...I'm not sure that I've overfilled it, last time I actually stopped short, but I am getting pressurisation in the tank so wonder if there is an issue with the carbon canister or rollover valve?

Hmm

ChimpOnGas

9,637 posts

202 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
As test only, drive with the fuel filler cap off and see if you temporarily effect a cure.

QBee

22,130 posts

167 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Are the roll over valve and the roll over safety cut out related?
It takes a lot to trip the cut out.
I have only done it once in 30,000 miles, entering a gravel trap sideways at speed.

FarmyardPants

4,295 posts

241 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
On a related note, the fuel tank on my cerb often gives a clunk as the fuel pump primes, and opening the cap always lets air in. Does this mean my carbon canister is buggered?

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Not 100% sure Qbee but its starting to make sense...I've been a bit disappointed with the performance since the Cam change and this is the first time the fuel has been at 1/4 since it was completed a week back. Its as I would expect a Chim 400 to perform when mechanically its now strong. But even before the work at 1/4 full it was noticably quicker than it is now when loaded.

Thats what I thought maybe easiest to remove or slacken the cap off and try it out.

Thanks for all the suggestions gents.

QBee

22,130 posts

167 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
My car feels the same regardless of fuel load, but my carbon canister has been deleted since I decatted the car. But it was fine before that.
Would it be ok to disconnect it for one longish Sunday drive to test the theory?

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Where are you disconnecting Qbee?

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Ah see what your saying..yes could do.

vsonix

3,861 posts

186 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
You're probably overfilling the tank and flooding the breather and carbon canister. Therefore not enough air is making its way back into the tank so your pump is trying to suck on a vacuum. By the time the tank is down to a 1/4 the carbon canister is probably free of fuel again and letting enough air back into the tank. The pump is then not trying to suck on a vacuum and is able to deliver the full flow rate.

You should replace the carbon canister, check the breather pipe routing, and make sure you never fill the tank past the first click/auto-stop on the petrol pump.
If that were the case, would it not be quite obvious from the amount of fuel vapour smell in the cabin? Z3s have an issue where i you over-brim it then fuel gets sucked into the charcoal canister, it then takes like three days to a week before the car stops smelling like it might conflagrate into a fireball if you drive past a naked flame. When I first discovered this little quirk I was convinced I was gonna end up barbequed before the end of the day.

QBee

22,130 posts

167 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
PhilH42 said:
Ah see what your saying..yes could do.
Just being cautious.
My canister was removed, but the guy who did it was an engineer, and he routed the pipe to the canister across the car to a one way valve that purges under the car by the front splitter. I didn't know if it was safe to simply disconnect the pipe anywhere near the hot engine.
I am assuming the canister is used to avoid unburnt fuel from destroying the main cat.

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
I think the can is related to the hydrocarbons and emissions...the tank is vented through the rollover valve and the canister...it is supposed to be taken to the inlet manifold from what I understand. The non cat models vent to atmosphere from memory. Agree not sure I'd want to disconnect near the engine..fuel or fume.

Just as a bit of feedback for anyone else with similar issues or for future I filled to just over 3/4 tank and left the cap off...I took it for a good 30-40 minute drive and it performed pretty good..certainly better than cap on...investigation now starts to see if its all purging correctly.

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
My journey took me via Bespoke....Martin's got a great set up...bit like a candy shop...very dangerous to spend too much time in there with Tuscans and Sags lurking!

PhilH42

Original Poster:

692 posts

125 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Oh and yes your right keeping the hydrocarbons down helps protect the cats.

350zwelgje

1,820 posts

284 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Have this with my wedge, perhaps helpfull for you.
My theory: Think if below a certain level...., it takes a lot of time for the remaining fuel to go back to the twin tanks in my case, gravity to feed the swirl pot, through a pre-filter, then at the pump, fuel filter and a couple of meters to get back up front to the injectors...
And the fuel regulator trying to maintain fuel pressure at low levels isn't helping either = stopping fuel to return.
Yes it runs perfect up to the last quarter and knowning that, I then only 'TVR-cruise', which isn't bad as other cars still are disappearing in the back biggrin
So fill up and 'normal' TVR mode resumes driving

Rob