The New Typhoon in EVO
The New Typhoon in EVO
Author
Discussion

pena

Original Poster:

317 posts

291 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
Anyone read about this yet.
Whats the thoughts on the CAD drawings.

I personally thinks it looks like the VX220 from the back, and the new logo looks a bit unfinished.

Any thoughts ?

pena

Original Poster:

317 posts

291 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
this one:






Edited by pena on Friday 19th January 17:11

Mr.Cerbera

5,151 posts

260 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
First thoughts ? - Bloody Nightmare !

but then I always was an old stick-in-the-mud. It might grow on me.

blutusc

172 posts

277 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
I don't condone TVR using CHRIS BANGLE's design team!!!!!!!!!!! Especially when you consider what's happening to TVR at the moment yikesyikesyikesyikes

pena

Original Poster:

317 posts

291 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
The car seems to have lost all the curves, that made tvr's different.
I hope that it's more of a bad CAD, than the actual design.

scurry

64 posts

249 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
Should read "Buffoon"

bobd

973 posts

250 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
Side elevation looks horrible!

the pits

4,290 posts

270 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
I actually think it's stunning. Or at least I imagine it would be if it ever saw the light of day which is currently very hard to believe. Trouble is, I'd never buy one even after a lottery win because of NS's behaviour and because it wouldn't be built in britain. I don't care even if it's built better abroad, the fact that my Tuscan was built in Blackpool was a major reason I bought it. A TVR should be at the very least built in britain, it's a fundamental component of every TVRs dna.

This is no TVR but it is a great bit of british design (NS didn't design it by the way and by all accounts has had very little to do with it on account of f***ing off to Vienna when he should have been facing the music over here). Everyone is understandably confusing the current tragedy with the looks of this prototype. The former sucks beyond belief, while the latter is actually first rate work.

glow worm

7,454 posts

257 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
It looks like a 10 year old has been let loose with a CAD package.

stainless_steve

6,052 posts

288 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
Like the front,looks mean,not sure about the back though.
Lets just hope TVR will be around to make it .

hut49

3,544 posts

292 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
I know that fiberglass cars are a lousy basis for radio reception but why would you put a roof aerial detail on a CAD concept for a 120k supercar? Incidentally this only seems to be present on the rear view.

BossCerbera

8,188 posts

273 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
hut49 said:
I know that fiberglass cars are a lousy basis for radio reception but why would you put a roof aerial detail on a CAD concept for a 120k supercar? Incidentally this only seems to be present on the rear view.

nerd Because it is possible - and was tested/proved, although not introduced to production AFAIK - to create a metal foil groundplane between the roof and the headlining for a DAB aerial. A factory demo Sagaris had this done.

Then again, might just have been an enthusiastic student sticking an aerial on the drawing.

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
I thought it looked VX220 from the back aswell.

I'm not convinced on the styling.

I very much doubt it will ever make it to production, it will be years off if it does.

I can't see anyone forking out £120k for a car from a manufacturer that has no clear direction (or idea) of where it is going.

I was discussing this with someone in the motor industry the other day and we reckoned that it would be at least six months before any kind of TVR production is up and running.

hut49

3,544 posts

292 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
BossCerbera said:
hut49 said:
I know that fiberglass cars are a lousy basis for radio reception but why would you put a roof aerial detail on a CAD concept for a 120k supercar? Incidentally this only seems to be present on the rear view.

nerd Because it is possible - and was tested/proved, although not introduced to production AFAIK - to create a metal foil groundplane between the roof and the headlining for a DAB aerial. A factory demo Sagaris had this done.

Then again, might just have been an enthusiastic student sticking an aerial on the drawing.

So you don't think the Evo concept was the design student's idea for a wicked radio-controlled car that some PR opportunist thought could be re-purposed as a newsworthy car launch placeholder?

BossCerbera

8,188 posts

273 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
hut49 said:
So you don't think the Evo concept was the design student's idea for a wicked radio-controlled car that some PR opportunist thought could be re-purposed as a newsworthy car launch placeholder?

....now you come to mention it.... the one they showed the dealers WAS radio-controlled size....

lazyitus

19,931 posts

296 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
I'm desperate to dislike anything TVR may be looking to produce in this new era. I feel dirty at the thought that I may like something built sans Blackpool.

Therefore, I have issues.


I like it.

Fly Boy

1,282 posts

271 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
£120K....vomit
You must be F@cking JOKING....

As they say in the colonies - it fell out of an ugly tree & hit every branch on the way down....

Lensey

2,526 posts

313 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
I reckon that will be the final nail in TVR's coffin, I just can't see anyone paying that sort of money for a TVR

yellow5

177 posts

245 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
I like it, it's outrageous and 600 bhp. now that's a TVR