Post your noise test results!
Post your noise test results!
Author
Discussion

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

272 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
I was slightly alarmed to find my more or less standard S3 returned nearly 104dB in a recent noise test. Is there any TVR that will pass the 98dB test at Bedford without extra baffles?

Vixpy1

42,699 posts

294 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Mine is 115db at 4K Static..

So no hehe

Zumbruk

7,848 posts

290 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
The numbers vary dramatically, depending on who measures them, where and when. My Chimaera, which has a standard exhaust, has varied from 97dB to 103dB.


Fly Boy

1,282 posts

271 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
At 4000/4250rpm a Tamora with standard system is less than 98db.

The Blueflame backbox (one of the quieter ones..) is only103db @ 4000 & it comes with insertable "db killers" for trackdays

de-catted about 108 @ iirc but peaks at 123db.

Biff's Cerb was measured at 133- the loudest I have heard....

carob

3,585 posts

241 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
130.5 At BNG08 and i wasnt giving it full beans.

Rob

davemac250

4,499 posts

235 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
I was slightly alarmed to find my more or less standard S3 returned nearly 104dB in a recent noise test. Is there any TVR that will pass the 98dB test at Bedford without extra baffles?
How was the test carried out?

I used to have a couple of TL1000S bikes that registered anything from 98 to 115 depending on engine temp, where the guy put the mic and where the bikes were stood. (98 was in the middle of a field with the mic upwind so was allowed to play that day - 115 in an enclosed area baking hot day and the guy all but stuck the mic up the end can)

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

272 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
davemac250 said:
Chris71 said:
I was slightly alarmed to find my more or less standard S3 returned nearly 104dB in a recent noise test. Is there any TVR that will pass the 98dB test at Bedford without extra baffles?
How was the test carried out?

I used to have a couple of TL1000S bikes that registered anything from 98 to 115 depending on engine temp, where the guy put the mic and where the bikes were stood. (98 was in the middle of a field with the mic upwind so was allowed to play that day - 115 in an enclosed area baking hot day and the guy all but stuck the mic up the end can)
That's actually a slightly sore point. That test was at Brands Hatch and all I saw was the scrutineer prodding the tail pipe with a stick, but I don't think that was the probe, I think it was a jig to give the required angle and distance from the pipe opening.

However, when we did a DIY test on the same car at the last PH North London meet, guessing as close to 1 metre at 45 degrees as we could it only came out at something like 98.

At least one of those readings is way off (bearing in mind decibles are a logarithmic scale).

grahamn

1,777 posts

264 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
Hi Chris, mine was 98 when tested at Bedford last year.

P400PLS

404 posts

257 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
Only had my Chimaera 400 tested once, prior to a track day last year.

Came out at 96dB. Can't remember what revs, 4000 I think.

I've always though it was quiet.

Byker28i

91,755 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
My cerbera was tested on Monday. 96 db with the trackday cans added, 106db without. I should add that's decatted with ACT's quiet system

Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 20th May 19:40

warpig

336 posts

235 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
my s6 cerb with blue flame silencers and de-cat was 117db at 4000rpm

lyceus

67 posts

254 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
I normally hit 102-103dB on the static test at Bedford, but have always persuaded them to let me try it on track without silencers (although I do bring them just in case!). Have not triggered the drive-by noise limits in four visits...

The drive-bys are the important ones, and they're located in hard acceleration areas - remember that you've got loads of torque, so you are likely to be at a low rev count where other marques would be screaming at 5k+

Other tracks only do a static test, in which case your only option is silencers if you have anything but a standard exhaust setup. It's always prudent to take a set of bolt-on silencers to track days in case there's an overly hard-line official present - they're available from a few sources for ~£100, and dropped me to 97dB for the static test.

Barry Ashcroft

1,958 posts

251 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
At Oulton my Tam with JP rearbox with cats fited was 108db

clive f

7,259 posts

263 months

Wednesday 20th May 2009
quotequote all
griff growl last year recorded mine at 127db hehe



no use for track days then.

Noisy

4,489 posts

307 months

Thursday 21st May 2009
quotequote all
Maxed out the noise meter on the tunnel run at 131 dB

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

272 months

Thursday 21st May 2009
quotequote all
Gents - any thoughts on the use of extra bolt-on silencers? Are there any downsides to it?

Look like something I'd definitely have to invest in if I used the car on track more.

broadside

856 posts

312 months

Thursday 21st May 2009
quotequote all
Mine was 126db at last years BNG. That was on 7 cylinders!! As I found out when changing the spark plugs a couple of weeks later. Oops.

raceboy

13,903 posts

310 months

Thursday 21st May 2009
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Gents - any thoughts on the use of extra bolt-on silencers? Are there any downsides to it?

Look like something I'd definitely have to invest in if I used the car on track more.
I've not got any numbers for mine but it's a little on the loud side. wink
Trackdays are a non-starter without my cans on the back....

...only downside is the looks really, I'd not dream of using them on the road but the dB level they reduce my car by is amazing and I've not seen any power reduction issues. driving

mgaut

774 posts

272 months

Thursday 21st May 2009
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Gents - any thoughts on the use of extra bolt-on silencers? Are there any downsides to it?

Look like something I'd definitely have to invest in if I used the car on track more.
The only downside on the bolt-on cans is that if you go to the Nurburgring they don't like them as they stick out beyond the bumper. You'll then get noise tested at 4,000 rpm at a distance of about an inch !!

You can buy mufflers to put up the pipes from several sources; I've reverted to these now.

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

272 months

Thursday 21st May 2009
quotequote all
mgaut said:
Chris71 said:
Gents - any thoughts on the use of extra bolt-on silencers? Are there any downsides to it?

Look like something I'd definitely have to invest in if I used the car on track more.
The only downside on the bolt-on cans is that if you go to the Nurburgring they don't like them as they stick out beyond the bumper. You'll then get noise tested at 4,000 rpm at a distance of about an inch !!

You can buy mufflers to put up the pipes from several sources; I've reverted to these now.
Interesting - so you litterally bung them up the exhaust pipe? Does that have any noticeable effect on the engine? That said, I guess, in theory, the back pressure change would be no more than losing the sound pressure in an external silencer...