nebula and moonraker....

[jayjay]

what is the difference?

thanks!

d

[andy43]

Roger Moore??

[Ace-T]

Nebula has much larger flakes of metal in it whereas Moonraker(what we have on the tusc) is just your normal black metallic paint.

There was a Nebula black T350 (IIRC) at TMS on their open day. I quite liked it, but I really think you have to be a total girly or have very severe show off tendencies to go for it cos it is completely

HTH

Ace-T

[jamer]

Moonraker is a metallic paint effect and really IMHO looks as good as most other Blacks, it is a popular choice and was a more popular choice in the

Griffith's of 1998,

Chimaera's of 1999-2000

and the Tuscans from 2000-present day

T350's and Tamora's

Mystic Black was the press coloured Tuscan and most copied that for a while to mirror the brochure car, but as this was Pearl without any flecks in it it seemed a extra cost for no reason and most I ordered for customers and as demos were in Moonraker

anyway I must get out more this year

[jigs]

Basically Nebula has multi-coloured flakes in it instead of just silver flakes.

[Nicksey]

Nebula looks like wrapping paper and is very flashy IMO and may go out of fashion (and therefore massive depreciation).



Moonraker is metallic and will always be cool.

[yellow peril]

Nebular is a very striking colour and will always attract attention........when the sun shines or it is under lights!

Unfortunately, if the sun isn't shining and it's not under lights the sparkle effect disappears and leaves a peppered effect on the paintwork.

Bearing in mind we have 6 months of the year without too much sun, I would be reluctant to go for a nebular effect in the future.

Mind you....given the right conditions....it is a stunning look.

All IMHO of course.....


....//P//