Advisory on MOT, parts replaced last MOT, usual?
Advisory on MOT, parts replaced last MOT, usual?
Author
Discussion

ssray

Original Poster:

1,226 posts

242 months

Thursday 13th February
quotequote all
Mk4 golf 2001 130pd
Bought last year and lower arms, track rod ends and arb bushes replaced with new, this mot after 10k miles it's showing a advisory on front suspension

Nearside Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))

Is this usual? It was brand new parts from the local large car spares place, so good turnaround and not sitting on the shelf for years

anonymous-user

71 months

Thursday 13th February
quotequote all
Not unheard. There is a lot of st in the aftermarket these days. There's been a big drive over the last decade to 'drive costs down'. Guess who that benefits? Any idea what brand of parts were used? Do you still have the invoice?

GreenV8S

30,956 posts

301 months

Thursday 13th February
quotequote all
Are you sure the problem relates to the parts you replaced? The advisory mentions sub-frame pins/bushings, which are not in the parts you listed.

ssray

Original Poster:

1,226 posts

242 months

Thursday 13th February
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
Are you sure the problem relates to the parts you replaced? The advisory mentions sub-frame pins/bushings, which are not in the parts you listed.
Not sure, thought was lower arm bushes.

As the metal bits are ok, summer time I may polybush it

Megaflow

10,488 posts

242 months

Thursday 13th February
quotequote all
The description reads more like a subframe bush than a lower arm bush to me.

stevieturbo

17,831 posts

264 months

Thursday 13th February
quotequote all
MrBig said:
Not unheard. There is a lot of st in the aftermarket these days. There's been a big drive over the last decade to 'drive costs down'. Guess who that benefits? Any idea what brand of parts were used? Do you still have the invoice?
Pretty much, a lot of parts are just junk.

If you want longevity, at least actual OEM parts do tend to be decent, albeit more pricey.

E-bmw

11,317 posts

169 months

Friday 14th February
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
Are you sure the problem relates to the parts you replaced? The advisory mentions sub-frame pins/bushings, which are not in the parts you listed.
^^^^ Wot 'e said.

Definitely doesn't sound like what you did last year.

FWIW in general if I see any suspension bush type failure, more often than not I have just bitten the bullet & done a full suspension refresh if the car is "a keeper".

ThingsBehindTheSun

2,299 posts

48 months

Friday 14th February
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
Pretty much, a lot of parts are just junk.

If you want longevity, at least actual OEM parts do tend to be decent, albeit more pricey.
This, replaced a lower ball joint on my previous shed at 14 years old with a cheapish but well known brand. Two years later it failed the MOT on the same part.

Just not worth it in my experience