What sort of mileage do you get out of a set of tyres?
What sort of mileage do you get out of a set of tyres?
Author
Discussion

Second Best

Original Poster:

6,533 posts

198 months

Was over at a friend's earlier to help him swap some wheels around on his family wagon (a VW Touran), he said the rears have been on the car since new, still had ~3mm of tread and had just ticked over 80,000 miles! He was only changing them as he had a spare set of alloys and had only just noticed the rear tyres were 11 years old so were due a change. 80k miles is pretty good going, I thought.

Meanwhile on an old works car I got a puncture on the way back from a service, where they'd changed the tyres too. It had covered 9 miles between tyre changes. grumpy

What's the best/worst you have got out of a set of tyres?

Mad Maximus

653 posts

20 months

80k seems crazy. I’m not actually sure as we don’t do huge mileages and haven’t kept cars typically for long enough to keep score.

otolith

62,339 posts

221 months

The 335D I just traded in still had the fronts it came with and the rears I put on it in July ‘23. Fronts legal but could do with replacing, rears ok a bit longer. Car was bought in October ‘22 and I put about 36k miles on it. Fronts were rainsports, rears were Michelin cross climates.

3GGy

860 posts

199 months

My last was 45k out of a pair of fronts on a Honda CRV. The rears where on it when I bought it and they weren't new, so I think they would have seen at least 50k.

Sheepshanks

37,770 posts

136 months

I changed the original front Bridgestone’s at 45K miles on 2005 Merc C270CDi but only because the edges had scrubbed and they looked bad at a kerbside glance. They still had 4 mm in the centre. Was mentioned on one MOT but not at the next.

The rears lasted 16K - caught me out and they were worn beyond where I’d normally change tyres.

cliffords

2,762 posts

40 months

Just for some opposite Ballance .
I have some Kumho tyres on the rear of an old Jag. They have been on 1000 miles and all ready down to 4 mm.

Drive gently, tracking and pressure correct .

kiethton

14,303 posts

197 months

On my old Astra motorway car (30k a year) the rears had over 6mm left 50k miles. After I got a new set I swapped them front to back to get them finished off. Fronts generally lasted 20k.


Riley Blue

22,490 posts

243 months

Neither of our cars does a high annual mileage (5,000 max) so tyres last and last but since June last year I've had two perfectly good tyre, one on each car, damaged beyond repair by potholes. furious


LightweightLouisDanvers

2,580 posts

60 months

I invariably use all terrain tyres on my Freelander 2. Had 48000 out of a set of General Grabbers, still legal with 3mm + on them.
Last set of Continental Cross Contact ATRs only managed 40000. Replaced with Michelin latitude cross a few weeks ago, high expectations for decent miles out of those.

2172cc

1,496 posts

114 months

cliffords said:
Just for some opposite Ballance .
I have some Kumho tyres on the rear of an old Jag. They have been on 1000 miles and all ready down to 4 mm.

Drive gently, tracking and pressure correct .
I had to change all four Pirelli P Zeros at 6800 miles on my Hyundai i20N bought new in Sept 23. Apparently this is quite good for these tyres as some people have only got 4000 odd miles out of them if used enthusiastically. Swapped front to rear at 3000 miles and they were already down to 4.5mm.
The Pirelli's are a bespoke tyre developed especially for the i20N but are very soft need a bit of heat to get the best out of them. Replaced with Michelin PS5 now and are a big improvement

smallpaul

1,970 posts

153 months

Conti eco contacts are 50% worn at 43000 miles on my ID3. Haven't been changed or punctured since new.

Bridgestones on another car puncture if you look at them the wrong way. 18k miles from the one tyre that wasn't replaced.

NDA

23,422 posts

242 months

2172cc said:
I had to change all four Pirelli P Zeros at 6800 miles on my Hyundai i20N bought new in Sept 23. Apparently this is quite good for these tyres as some people have only got 4000 odd miles out of them if used enthusiastically.
That was about the mileage I used to get out of my Ford GT. Mad.

I have a Tesla M3 for daily duties and I'm getting around 30,000 miles out of a set.

kambites

69,883 posts

238 months

About 10-15k out of the Lotus (for purely road use).

Not sure about the MG4 yet, but looking at the wear rate of the OEM Bridgestones, I'd say it'll be somewhere around the 20-30k mark.

AC43

12,820 posts

225 months

On my first 200SX I got through 4 in less than 10k. I spun the tread off two of them and finished the other two with bad punctures.

It was a company car and the lease company banned me from getting Toyos fitted anywhere in the UK.

TommoAE86

2,825 posts

144 months

cliffords said:
Just for some opposite Ballance .
I have some Kumho tyres on the rear of an old Jag. They have been on 1000 miles and all ready down to 4 mm.

Drive gently, tracking and pressure correct .
My S-type ate tyres for fun, not fun at the prices back then even tried switching to the OEM recommended brand and made no difference.

My Yokohama's have been on the Crown for about 3yrs now but WFH has dropped my mileage significantly so getting to 3-4mm around now is about right.

MustangGT

13,452 posts

297 months

LightweightLouisDanvers said:
I invariably use all terrain tyres on my Freelander 2. Had 48000 out of a set of General Grabbers, still legal with 3mm + on them.

Michelin latitude cross a few weeks ago, high expectations for decent miles out of those.
Most Michelin tyres have less tread depth from new, may not do as many because of that.

cerb4.5lee

38,154 posts

197 months

Best for me was Vredestein Quatrac 5 on the GLC350d, and I got 50k miles out of the front, and 75k miles out of the rears.

The worst was Continental Sport Contact 5's on the rear of the GLE400d, and they only lasted 6k miles/3 months.

snotrag

15,213 posts

228 months

Obviously very car dependent - and driver!

From experience, smaller non sporty hatchbacks, citroens, peugeots etc in particular can run on a set of rear tyres for eons - lightweight cars, with very front biased weight distribution, but also a very front biased drive - soft suspension on the front, a lot of load being transferred onto the front outer tyre on roundabouts etc, no weight in the back as its only ever 1 up with an empty boot and 1/4 tank of fuel, the back tyres basically only there because the rule book says you need to have 4.

Partners C3 did I think about 3:1 ratio in terms of front to back tyre wear, all on the same michelin tyre type and size too.

If you keep on top of rotating them regularly its not a problem, but of course no one ever does.

Many, many of these cars will sit on a forecourt at 4, 5, 6 years old with one brand new set of budget tyres, and one 5 year old pair of rock hard, cracked OE fit originals!

Sheepshanks

37,770 posts

136 months

cerb4.5lee said:
Best for me was Vredestein Quatrac 5 on the GLC350d, and I got 50k miles out of the front, and 75k miles out of the rears.

The worst was Continental Sport Contact 5's on the rear of the GLE400d, and they only lasted 6k miles/3 months.
Amazing how those cars chould produce such wildly different results.

cerb4.5lee

38,154 posts

197 months

Sheepshanks said:
cerb4.5lee said:
Best for me was Vredestein Quatrac 5 on the GLC350d, and I got 50k miles out of the front, and 75k miles out of the rears.

The worst was Continental Sport Contact 5's on the rear of the GLE400d, and they only lasted 6k miles/3 months.
Amazing how those cars chould produce such wildly different results.
It is mad isn't it? I do think the GLE had a faulty rear diff on it though, and that was impacting the rear tyre wear. It was apparently fixed at Merc, but it still chewed through the rear tyres though anyway.

I've currently got Continentals on the X5 40d, and they're on nearly 17k miles now, and there's still loads of tread left on them though in comparison.