Factory Tyre Longevity
Author
Discussion

Warhavernet

Original Poster:

722 posts

9 months

I'll leave it to Mods to move this should it require.

Watching an American guy on YT with a ' 23 plate AWD Sportage with 100K [ yeah, I know] and he said the factory tyres were replaced at 64K miles. Cheesy Peas, I could barely get 30K on the from new factory front tyres on my Puma.

Is it that the AWD shares the wear evenly to all four tyres, or KIa fit quality tyres, or his state doesn't have compulsory annual vehicle checks and he runs 'em buggers down to the rims ? Where can I buy these tyres ?

Sheepshanks

38,982 posts

141 months

100K in 2-3 years suggests a lot of long journeys. AWD will help, but Americans are big on tyre rotation which evens things up anyway.

Common to see tyres in the US sold with mileage guarantees up to 80K miles - unthinkable to UK owners.

FlyingPanda

599 posts

112 months

Something to do with softer suspension and fewer corners on the roads?

Badda

3,560 posts

104 months

Lower speed limits too must help id imagine.

Mr Penguin

4,011 posts

61 months

Saturday
quotequote all
If you regularly drive very long distances on motorways at 60mph you might almost never brake or go around a sharp corner and they will be under very little stress and will last a long time.

hammo19

6,973 posts

218 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Roads are in much better condition there.

Doesitdrive

205 posts

3 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Warhavernet said:
I'll leave it to Mods to move this should it require.

Watching an American guy on YT with a ' 23 plate AWD Sportage with 100K [ yeah, I know] and he said the factory tyres were replaced at 64K miles. Cheesy Peas, I could barely get 30K on the from new factory front tyres on my Puma.

Is it that the AWD shares the wear evenly to all four tyres, or KIa fit quality tyres, or his state doesn't have compulsory annual vehicle checks and he runs 'em buggers down to the rims ? Where can I buy these tyres ?
I replaced the 4 rear tyres on my truck a couple of weeks ago.
Bought new, the recorded mileage was exactly 89200. They still had life in them, only a puncture forced the decision.

It does happen.

Spare tyre

12,004 posts

152 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Loads of variables

I had a car with rear tyres that had done over 180 thousand

It was my trusty old Peugeot that did a minimum of 120 miles a day on the motorway at a gentle 55/60 mph, no real corners no braking

The tyres were fine, I’m very hot on their condition

stevieturbo

17,933 posts

269 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Warhavernet said:
I'll leave it to Mods to move this should it require.

Watching an American guy on YT with a ' 23 plate AWD Sportage with 100K [ yeah, I know] and he said the factory tyres were replaced at 64K miles. Cheesy Peas, I could barely get 30K on the from new factory front tyres on my Puma.

Is it that the AWD shares the wear evenly to all four tyres, or KIa fit quality tyres, or his state doesn't have compulsory annual vehicle checks and he runs 'em buggers down to the rims ? Where can I buy these tyres ?
From Jon's video's on YT, it sounds like the US has rules about tyre longevity, so the compounds are different than here etc.

Although also from a lot of stuff from the US....it almost sounds like there are no real rules so not sure when they consider a tyre actually bad to need replaced.
I certainly don't get the impression it's the 1.6mm or anything like it. It nearly sounds like a lot run them literally til the rubber is gone

Kawasicki

14,104 posts

257 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Define tyre quality. If tyre quality means 100k miles then that is reasonably easy for tyre manufacturers to achieve.

bad company

21,280 posts

288 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Badda said:
Lower speed limits too must help id imagine.
Have you been to the USA lately? Their speed limits are generally higher than ours.

A few years ago Mrs BC got a speeding ticket on a road in Texas with a 90 mph limit. biglaugh

E-bmw

12,070 posts

174 months

Saturday
quotequote all
hammo19 said:
Roads are in much better condition there.
I don't know about better condition (my experience obviously may differ) but certainly less abrasive (AKA terrible grip in the wet) and straighter with no roundabouts that I recall driving around.

K87

4,144 posts

121 months

Saturday
quotequote all
A general question, is the Treadwear number on the sidewall, usually starting at around 200 a genuine indicator of how many miles a tyre might cover?



E-bmw

12,070 posts

174 months

Saturday
quotequote all
K87 said:
A general question, is the Treadwear number on the sidewall, usually starting at around 200 a genuine indicator of how many miles a tyre might cover?
Yes, but, no, but.

I think they are relative rather than absolute.

As in a Bridgestone tyre with 400 will likely last double the mileage (all else being equal) a tyre with 200 rating.

Techno9000

210 posts

98 months

Saturday
quotequote all
As already mentioned, compounds are different in the North American Market, they're looking at a customer base that can do big mileage per year. Some tyre sellers warrant 50000 miles...so you can imagine many more miles are possible.

wildoliver

9,203 posts

238 months

Yesterday (08:31)
quotequote all
Variety of the points mentioned, tyre compounds being one, who can remember old P6000s or assorted Michelin's? Lousy grip but would go on and on and on, I had a set of p6000s on an old 924s which being tight i refused to change as they were pretty much full tread despite being the best part of 20 years old, they just never wore out, deadly in the cold and wet, now I'm lucky to get a couple of years out of a set of tyres before they are cracking on the side walls, thankfully I wear them out reasonably quickly so it's not the end of the world.

But the American roads are generally in far better condition than ours, where I live in Yorkshire the roads are getting embarrassing, we were in York yesterday it looks like the RAF have been practicing runway denial bombing. A few years ago we did 8500 miles around the east side of America and I can honestly say I saw one pothole of note. Granted it was in the middle lane of a freeway, no warning other than Waze and would have ripped a wheel off, but I've seen half a dozen potholes this morning on my 8 mile commute.

Lack of roundabouts will make a difference too, despite what people think there are no shortage of corners in America, there are a few of the worlds best driving roads and drives there for a start, but the almost complete absence of roundabouts is great, and that combined with a decent standard of driving at least in the sense they want to get moving, cover the distance and not be constantly stopping removes the constant accelerate/brake driving we have here in the UK. I suspect France probably gets good distance out of tyres too, their motorway system is absolutely excellent allowing big mileage in short times with little stress or hassle.

If we cared about co2 emissions in this country we would have focussed a long time ago on keeping cars moving instead of "traffic calming". But all we seem to want to do is make the road system as hard and frustrating to use as possible.

E-bmw

12,070 posts

174 months

Yesterday (10:40)
quotequote all
wildoliver said:
If we cared about co2 emissions in this country we would have focussed a long time ago on keeping cars moving instead of "traffic calming". But all we seem to want to do is make the road system as hard and frustrating to use as possible.
100% agree with that one.

I have often said the most efficient cars are those either parked up or moving at an efficient speed, whereas we have adopted the "tax them off the road/make it difficult" approach to road/vehicle management.

Smint

2,764 posts

57 months

Yesterday (13:01)
quotequote all
Rolling radius makes all the difference.

4x4s and pick ups running on high aspect ratio tyres frequently return 50+k miles even on our ruined and twisty roads, helps that many start with 10+ mm new tread.


Milkyway

11,909 posts

75 months

Yesterday (13:16)
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
Define tyre quality. If tyre quality means 100k miles then that is reasonably easy for tyre manufacturers to achieve.
100K miles or five years...whichever come first. whistle
(Under normal driving conditions.)


Edited by Milkyway on Monday 9th February 13:20

Kawasicki

14,104 posts

257 months

Yesterday (13:19)
quotequote all
Milkyway said:
Kawasicki said:
Define tyre quality. If tyre quality means 100k miles then that is reasonably easy for tyre manufacturers to achieve.
100K miles or five years...whichever come first. whistle
Easy target! I’ll assume you aren’t bothered about wet or dry grip, steering, ride or noise.