Bentley T Series v Silver shadow
Author
Discussion

restoman

Original Poster:

1,011 posts

237 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Why do the late 60s/early 70s Bentleys command a much higher price than the Silver Shadows of the same period when they are essentially the same car? I realise that the Bentley was produced in much smaller numbers but is that the only reason?

guru_1071

2,768 posts

263 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
tatty old silver shadow = scrapman car dealer with a sheepskin coat.

tatty old t1 = understated class


smile

Johnspex

5,237 posts

213 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Years ago I read about some rock star who had a Bentley, when asked why headn't got a Rols Royce instead he replied " A Rolls Royce is a statement, a Bentley is an understatement".

Bentley everytime.

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

277 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Rarity, and a classier image.

Although the image of the Silver Shadow has changed somewhat over the past two decades, and they are no longer seen as flashy, vulgar or ostentatious, being run on the cheap by people who might wear white socks and grey shoes, and run a club.

I like to see a scruffy run down Shadow as much as a nice clean original example in subtle colours. But even some of the worst colour combos of the seventies are looking retro cool by the bucket load nowadays.

EG




cardigankid

8,879 posts

241 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
There is rarity, but I would think value is much more down to the individual vehicle. I would rather have an immaculate Shadow than a dodgy T. As it happens I have an immaculate T! wink

tonys

1,080 posts

252 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Values just seemed to get talked up when Bentley adopted a more sporting image from the late '80s onwards.
Personally, I can't see any logical reason for it as they are the same car, radiator & badges excepted. It's purely an image thing. I think the 'ostentatious' image issue that Rolls might have suffered from years ago has passed, a bit like the bright red 911 turbos from the '80s.

I'd rather have a Shadow with a handling kit than a T without, all other things being equal.(You can guess what I have smile)

An Austin 1100 is better than a Morris 1100. Discuss.smile What's the difference in the RR/Bentley case?

Edited by tonys on Thursday 22 December 22:13

HenryRoyce

829 posts

188 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
cardigankid said:
There is rarity, but I would think value is much more down to the individual vehicle. I would rather have an immaculate Shadow than a dodgy T. As it happens I have an immaculate T! wink
Exactly this. I set out looking for a T, but ended up with a Silver Shadow because it was significantly better than anything I had seen before for the price. I think all Silver Shadow derivatives are woefully undervalued at the moment. This side of a new Phantom, I can think of little that would give me greater pleasure and I certainly would rank a Silver Shadow higher than a Spirit or Seraph.

cardigankid

8,879 posts

241 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
I agree, and I say that with no sense of bias. I have driven Arnage's, new Mulsanne, Conti GT-FS. For sheer pleasure, though not speed, the Shadow (and I include the T) has them licked. It has the sense of occasion of the Cloud, with a lot more driveability.

Huntsman

9,305 posts

279 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
Although the image of the Silver Shadow has changed somewhat over the past two decades
I reckon you are right BG, the Shadow 1 especially is a very cool car and good value for money right now.

theadman

725 posts

186 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
An Austin 1100 is better than a Morris 1100. Discuss.

...or a Volkswagen is better than a BMW? biggrin

Church of Noise

1,654 posts

266 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
is it possible for a mere mortal to run these as a daily driver? (ie: how crippling is maintaining one?)

graemel

7,224 posts

246 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
My father in law has run one for nigh on 20 years. Bought with 33,000 miles on the clock and I think has maybe 45,000 miles on it now. He mainly uses it in the summer months. With the odd emergency. Whilst suffering from a broken hip and still on crutches, I had to rush my father in law to hospital. My other half and mother in law went as well. The Shadow 11 was the only car we have that we could all fit in. Did gain some amusing glances whilst waiting outside A & E, disabled badge and crutches. In fact I've driven it quite a few times on hospital trips.
Apart from a starter motor, a battery isolater switch, occasional blowing exhaust manifolds and tyres it has cost very little to maintain. Fuel consumption I'm guessing maybe 14mpg. Daily use, quite possible but tin worm is the enemy. Even 20 years ago it was hard to find a good one. I looked at over 20 cars before he bought this one. A 1980 Shadow 11 £15500 from memory which was strong money back then, but its as new condition warranted the price tag.

Huntsman

9,305 posts

279 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
Church of Noise said:
is it possible for a mere mortal to run these as a daily driver? (ie: how crippling is maintaining one?)
I keep asking myself that...

As far as I can ascertain, someone reasonably handy with spanners and prepared to do the back ground reading, I think its a relatively simple car using some stuff from elswhere, ie GM g'box and Citroen suspension.

They seem to suffer with tinworm, but it cant be any harder putting a wheel arch repair section on a Shadow than on any other car?

Trim and carpets get a bit grotty, few quid but not the end of the world.

Lots of very grotty ones being broken for spares so a supply of bits is there.

What could possibly go wrong?


aeropilot

40,524 posts

256 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
I would love to have the spare cash to buy a white RR-SS, then stick a pair of big Hella's on the front and drop in a big block Chevy with a lumpy cam and headers..... biggrin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cODolsPxhaU&fea...

spoodler

2,304 posts

184 months

Monday 26th December 2011
quotequote all
Agree with most on here about how the value difference can only be down to image....interesting thing image. Many years back, probably twenty odd years, I nearly bought a T1 that had been attacked with brake fluid. That was one of the reasons it was within my reach, the other was because it was a Bentley not a Rolls Royce. At the time at least Rolls had an image, Bentley was largely forgotten and existed purely as a badge engineered Silver Shadow - or that was the general perception.
More recently when I was working on my Bond Equipe I got chatting to a contractor working in our alleyway. He was restoring a similar equipe for his daughter. We talked old cars and he mentioned he owned a "classic Bentley" - I forget what exactly but he mentioned Derby (or similar) and I said flippantly "Oh you mean a real one", his reply, in all seriousness, "Yes, a real one, not a corrugated shed like a Silver Shadow..."
I got similar reaction about my 924 from real Porsche owners, and a friend received nigh on the same from real Jensen types regarding his Healey...yes, interesting thing image...

Church of Noise

1,654 posts

266 months

Monday 26th December 2011
quotequote all
Huntsman said:
What could possibly go wrong?
That's exactly the type of question I ask myself all to often, regarding several cars :-)

The answer is 'a lot' in some cases.

Does anyone on PH own one of these?

tonys

1,080 posts

252 months

Monday 26th December 2011
quotequote all
Church of Noise said:
Huntsman said:
What could possibly go wrong?
That's exactly the type of question I ask myself all to often, regarding several cars :-)

The answer is 'a lot' in some cases.

Does anyone on PH own one of these?
Own one of what? T Series / Silver Shadow? If that's the question, the answer is yes (but not as a daily driver).
PM me if you want more info.

andyh68

1,383 posts

202 months

Tuesday 27th December 2011
quotequote all
Rarity, fashion, image - I think it's Spirits/Mulsannes that are now suffering from being associated with wedding cars. In contrast, good Shadows and T series have become genuine classics.

I do like the idea of an early "chippendale dash" Shadow, but as already mentioned, if contemplating a Shadow or T series it's condition that should be the deciding factor.

From the fashion/image perspective, it seems to me that the perception of Rolls-Royce has improved in recent years, while that of Bentley has deteriorated with increased volumes. A double edged sword....

Huntsman

9,305 posts

279 months

Tuesday 27th December 2011
quotequote all
andyh68 said:
I think it's Spirits/Mulsannes that are now suffering
Certainly a lot of rough looking Spirits about, I reckon a nice Shadow could be run for nothing if one is prepared to do a few weddings.


HenryRoyce

829 posts

188 months

Tuesday 27th December 2011
quotequote all
Church of Noise said:
is it possible for a mere mortal to run these as a daily driver? (ie: how crippling is maintaining one?)
I ran mine as a daily driver for a short time. The car's 12 MPG thirst made the annual £1,500 service/repair bill pale into insignificance...