Six new Jaguar EType LW's to be made...
Six new Jaguar EType LW's to be made...
Author
Discussion

v8250

Original Poster:

2,747 posts

240 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/luxury/motoring/33632/j...

Am I being cynical here or are JLR just cashing in on the current market values?

HumbleJim

28,944 posts

212 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
They are in the business of making cars, fair play.
Heaven forbid they make a profit

XJ13

410 posts

198 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
HumbleJim said:
They are in the business of making cars, fair play.
Heaven forbid they make a profit
thumbup

DonkeyApple

69,576 posts

198 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
v8250 said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/luxury/motoring/33632/j...

Am I being cynical here or are JLR just cashing in on the current market values?
Not sure it would be cynical. They are a corporate business that exists solely to create profit. They are not a charity.

This is a fantastic way to make sure the market knows that they are opening a 'made to order' division. Every car publication is telling their customers without any marketing spend. The cars will also ensure headlines at many shows over the next couple of years. All in all it seems like a fantastic bit of business sense.

Paracetamol

4,267 posts

273 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
You will no doubt want all owners to wear beards and for JLR to sell them for no more than 1500gbp...

Flatinfourth

591 posts

167 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Jaguar have what appears to be an opportunity to be able to produce six brand new cars having delayed their production for half a century. To be able to produce those cars to period construction and use and type approval rules is a truly extraordinary thing that should be celebrated, whatever the price tag on the cars is.

Look at it another way. If Land Rover offered us a series 1 80" brand new to 1951 spec, that would mean no belts, pretensioners, windscreen, top, doors, airbags, "safety cell", ABS, drive-by-wire, "driver aids" and so on, would we not all jump at the chance of finding a way round all the legislation and nannying that goes with a new car? Yes please!!!!

john2443

6,540 posts

240 months

Saturday 17th May 2014
quotequote all
Flatinfourth said:
Jaguar have what appears to be an opportunity to be able to produce six brand new cars having delayed their production for half a century. To be able to produce those cars to period construction and use and type approval rules is a truly extraordinary thing that should be celebrated, whatever the price tag on the cars is.

Look at it another way. If Land Rover offered us a series 1 80" brand new to 1951 spec, that would mean no belts, pretensioners, windscreen, top, doors, airbags, "safety cell", ABS, drive-by-wire, "driver aids" and so on, would we not all jump at the chance of finding a way round all the legislation and nannying that goes with a new car? Yes please!!!!
That wouldn't find a way round the legislation and neither does the Jag, you wouldn't be able to use them on the road.

HumbleJim

28,944 posts

212 months

Saturday 17th May 2014
quotequote all
john2443 said:
That wouldn't find a way round the legislation and neither does the Jag, you wouldn't be able to use them on the road.
I'm not sure. Does the legislation come into play for such a small production run? Isn't this how Caterham get around it.

DonkeyApple

69,576 posts

198 months

Saturday 17th May 2014
quotequote all
Isn't there a convenient quirk within continuations that the chassis numbers have been registered but never ended up being assigned?

Flatinfourth

591 posts

167 months

Saturday 17th May 2014
quotequote all
HumbleJim said:
john2443 said:
That wouldn't find a way round the legislation and neither does the Jag, you wouldn't be able to use them on the road.
I'm not sure. Does the legislation come into play for such a small production run? Isn't this how Caterham get around it.
Isn't that exactly the point? The production of those cars was in effect simply delayed,if for rather a long time! The chassis numbers were allocated at the time. Would be interesting to know whether there are in fact registration numbers also in place, that would seem unlikely.

Maybe they would like to have another go at building all the XKSS

DonkeyApple

69,576 posts

198 months

Saturday 17th May 2014
quotequote all
Flatinfourth said:
Isn't that exactly the point? The production of those cars was in effect simply delayed,if for rather a long time! The chassis numbers were allocated at the time. Would be interesting to know whether there are in fact registration numbers also in place, that would seem unlikely.

Maybe they would like to have another go at building all the XKSS
Weren't all the xkss cars built and then hit by a spot of Jewish Lightning?

Edited by DonkeyApple on Saturday 17th May 14:31

Elderly

3,735 posts

267 months

Saturday 17th May 2014
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Weren't all the xkss cars built and then hit by a spot of Jewish Lightening?
Is there such a thing as a lightweight XKSS? rolleyes

DonkeyApple

69,576 posts

198 months

Saturday 17th May 2014
quotequote all
Elderly said:
DonkeyApple said:
Weren't all the xkss cars built and then hit by a spot of Jewish Lightning?
Is there such a thing as a lightweight XKSS? rolleyes
biggrin. Corrected now.

dome

688 posts

286 months

Saturday 17th May 2014
quotequote all
Not just the E-type they're recreating it appears...

http://sniffpetrol.com/2014/05/15/jaguar-announces...