NEC Restoration show - small rant
Author
Discussion

marshalla

Original Poster:

15,902 posts

230 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Is anyone else involved with putting together a club stand for the NEC Resto show ?

If so, have you been asked for a full risk assessment in spite of not doing anything different to what you did last year ? Apparently cutting out a few bits of fabric and gluing them to plastic trim inserts counts as a high-risk activity now.

It's starting to feel like the organisers want to kill off the event already by overloading the volunteer exhibitors with stupid paperwork. The requirement for high-vis during setup and breakdown is already ridiculous enough.



Edited by marshalla on Monday 15th February 09:21

Maulden7

147 posts

261 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
We don't do this show (Sunbeam Lotus OC) but these new procedures were in place for the NEC Classic Car Show last November.

In fact it all looks more daunting than it actually is in practice. Get everybody to sign their individual forms, buy some cheap high viz bibs, wear the wristlets, ....... the stewards inside are always helpful ......... it'll be fine.

marshalla

Original Poster:

15,902 posts

230 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Yeah - we did the November show too. Those high-vis vests really solved the problem of people getting run over didn't they ?

My gripe is about the organisers not understanding their own procedures. We've completed the forms for the resto show and declared what we'll be doing - all of which fits in their low risk categories, so we've done their low-risk simple risk assessment form as well as required by their declaration form. (damned if I know why, though - anything on the stand is covered by OUR insurance, not theirs).

NOW, they're asking for full risk assessments for the same low risk activities they were happy with last year and which their own forms declare as low risk and exempt from the full risk assessment process. And they're the ones encouraging us to put on live working demos. for the punters to criticise.

They just can't follow their own procedures consistently.



Edited by marshalla on Monday 15th February 09:53

55palfers

6,360 posts

193 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
If it was low risk last year and nothing significant has changed on your stand, then it's low risk this year.

http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/casestudies/

This HSE link has a number of very useful case studies to cut & paste

marshalla

Original Poster:

15,902 posts

230 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
55palfers said:
If it was low risk last year and nothing significant has changed on your stand, then it's low risk this year.

http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/casestudies/

This HSE link has a number of very useful case studies to cut & paste
*I* know that, and you know that - and the organisers' forms even assess it that way, but the organisers have decided to ask for the full monty anyway.



55palfers

6,360 posts

193 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
I used to get this all the time.

(CMIOSH and 30 years in H&S in high hazard / high consequence stuff)

If an activity has already been assessed as low hazard / low risk it takes a bit of doing to find anything meaningful to say in RA.

The problem is, most of the people asking for RA docs have no idea what they are talking about and it's just a box ticking job of collating bits (reams!) of paper. I'll bet that unless there is an incident / possible claim, the paperwork will never even be read.


What exactly will be you be doing on the stand?

restoman

1,011 posts

237 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Now . . . let's see if I've got this right . . .

Clubs and individuals have to pay the organisers to exhibit their cars.
Clubs and individuals have to pay their own incidental expenses (accomodatione etc).
The organisers effectively make clubs and individuals jump through hoops to exhibit their cars.
The organisers charge members of the public to visit the show.
The organisers no doubt make a nice profit.
The clubs and individual exhibitors are left well out of pocket.
Without willing clubs and individuals there would be no show and the organisers would therefore make zilch.
Yet clubs and individuals still want to exhibit their cars at such shows.




marshalla

Original Poster:

15,902 posts

230 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
restoman said:
Now . . . let's see if I've got this right . . .

Clubs and individuals have to pay the organisers to exhibit their cars.
Clubs and individuals have to pay their own incidental expenses (accomodatione etc).
The organisers effectively make clubs and individuals jump through hoops to exhibit their cars.
The organisers charge members of the public to visit the show.
The organisers no doubt make a nice profit.
The clubs and individual exhibitors are left well out of pocket.
Without willing clubs and individuals there would be no show and the organisers would therefore make zilch.
Yet clubs and individuals still want to exhibit their cars at such shows.
You haven't.

Willhire89

1,461 posts

234 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Sounds right to me - which bits would you care to challenge?

marshalla

Original Poster:

15,902 posts

230 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Willhire89 said:
Sounds right to me - which bits would you care to challenge?
We don't pay to exhibit.

Willhire89

1,461 posts

234 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
So you're not paying for carpet (or removal of carpet afterwards) or for any electrical feeds or AV?

You agree the rest was right though...?

AcidRich

427 posts

257 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
I build exhibition stands and the HSE recently included stands as a 'temporary works' in the CDM regs.
I have to fill out forms for every stand now and Hi viz was compulsory on the build days at the Spring Fair for the first time.

Russwhitehouse

962 posts

160 months

Tuesday 16th February 2016
quotequote all
Jesus Christ! The world has gone mad and we are ruled by bean counters, lawyers and safety Nazis! I despair of not just the nanny state, but the nanny world! I hate it!

dnb

3,330 posts

271 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
Just wait until the H&S lot catch on to a fairly common process whereby 1.5 tonne lumps of metal are moved past people wearing no particular safety equipment by people with very little initial training and no requirement for training refreshment at a distance of about a metre with no safety barriers at speeds of over 13.5 metres per second... wink

Russwhitehouse

962 posts

160 months

Wednesday 17th February 2016
quotequote all
For heavens sake don't go putting ideas into their heads dnb!!!!!