Forced to loose 60yr reg. no. For an age related one. Help!
Forced to loose 60yr reg. no. For an age related one. Help!
Author
Discussion

Spinneyman

Original Poster:

2 posts

105 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Hi, Apologies for the length but will try to précis as much as poss.
We have owned our 1957 MGA for 33 years. It has either been taxed or SORN. 2.5 years ago car was valued. They noted V5 had a different engine/chassis number (26 years ago car renovated. MGB engine/new chassis). They advised send V5 to DVLA to get it amended. BIG MISTAKE!
DVLA now say as chassis replaced and we can’t prove it was new (no receipts from 1991 renovation) our treasured reg. no is gone, to be replaced with a 1957 reg from their “stock”. Ironically we now know, from the new chassis number, it was made in 1957. Also that MGCC have no record of that chassis on a car. So we can’t prove its new, but DVLA can’t prove it wasn’t. (Whether it would be possible to source a new chassis is a moot point, but IMO has nothing to do with the DVLA ‘rules’.)
For 2.5 years we’ve been trying to hang on to our reg. no. We’ve only got the DVLA final (3rd) appeal process left, but don’t believe that it will support our position, as the so say independant arbitrator only looks at ‘are DVLA rules applied properly’.
Our views are:
a) Is it reasonable and fair to decide the chassis was not new, given there is no evidence to the contrary?
b) Where is the sense/logic of taking away a 1957 reg.no that the car has had for over 60 years including 26 with a different 1957 chassis, only to replace it with one that’s is deemed to be of the same ‘age’?
By the way our treasured number is worth approx £3-4000, but it’s not just its value, our number is an intrinsic part of our beloved car.

Any help/advice would be much appreciated.

Gwyneth

InitialDave

15,072 posts

148 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
If it were a new chassis, why does it have a different number? Wouldn't it be supplied without one, or have the original transferred to it? That would be a flag for me under your point (a).

vpr

3,927 posts

267 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Fair point re chassis number.

A new replacement chassis would surely ha e had the original number stamped on it??

Ardennes92

708 posts

109 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
I can see some logic with the chassis number being different causing an issue but swapping one 1957 reg with another 1957 reg seems strange unless generating a "profit" for the dvla is the driver

Riley Blue

23,205 posts

255 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Are there no MG build records anywhere, Gaydon for example? I know they have Riley records in their archive.

aeropilot

40,526 posts

256 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Spinneyman said:
So we can’t prove its new, but DVLA can’t prove it wasn’t.
I'm afraid, as the regs are written, the onus is on you to prove its what you say/claim, not the DVLA to prove it isn't.

So, whats the story on where the frame came from? Was it unused or a used frame?


sim16v

2,177 posts

230 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Slightly naughty, but say you've cleaned up the chassis completely and found the original number.

It looks as if the new number had been added later, possibly at the time of restoration, but you have no idea why......



Also, a bit late in hindsight, but a lot of cars are restored from a pile of scrap and paperwork.

As you've found out, it really isn't worth opening the can of worms that is changing chassis numbers with the DVLA.




Astacus

3,737 posts

263 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
what would happen if you now paid out for a replacement new chassis?

POORCARDEALER

8,663 posts

270 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all


Ref losing reg numbers....I lost a £5K number plate last year on a car I exported which was an un mot'd project that had been off the road for 30 years, dvla rules are very inflexible

MaisiesDad

50 posts

140 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Why not ask if they will let you keep the number on a non transferable basis, bit of a meet half way thing?

aeropilot

40,526 posts

256 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
MaisiesDad said:
Why not ask if they will let you keep the number on a non transferable basis, bit of a meet half way thing?
Worth a try, but I suspect they won't oblige.

The problem is as far as DVLA are concerned, the orig reg number applies to the original chassis, which is now pressumably long since destroyed and therefore that's why they want to re-register it. Even the engine is different, and different type as well, so lots of points gone from 14 now, which is why they want proof of new replacement chassis. Chassis with a different ID is a no-no, and is now possibly going to be considered a re-constructed classic not a VHI as well?




4rephill

5,165 posts

207 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
sim16v said:
Slightly naughty, but say you've cleaned up the chassis completely and found the original number.

It looks as if the new number had been added later, possibly at the time of restoration, but you have no idea why......
Yes!..... Suddenly declaring that you've found the original chassis number on the replacement chassis after all this time, and have no idea why the chassis now has two different chassis numbers, shouldn't raise any suspicions with the DVLA should it! rolleyes

Give it a go OP - The DVLA might then issue you one of their ultra-rare Q plates to put on your car as they decide that the age of the components making up the car can no longer be determined!

aeropilot

40,526 posts

256 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
4rephill said:
sim16v said:
Slightly naughty, but say you've cleaned up the chassis completely and found the original number.

It looks as if the new number had been added later, possibly at the time of restoration, but you have no idea why......
Yes!..... Suddenly declaring that you've found the original chassis number on the replacement chassis after all this time, and have no idea why the chassis now has two different chassis numbers, shouldn't raise any suspicions with the DVLA should it! rolleyes

Give it a go OP - The DVLA might then issue you one of their ultra-rare Q plates to put on your car as they decide that the age of the components making up the car can no longer be determined!
Won't be Q-plated, DVLA have already stated will be re-issued with date related plate, as now constitutes a re-constructed classic.

Given the MGA frame numbers and VIN number stampings were not the deepest of hand stampings, on the chassis boxes, and have usually rusted, been ground away/blasted/painted over during refurbishment, I'm surprised that the people doing the valuation were able to even read it!! Sounds like the 'new' chassis wasn't even prepared/re-painted at the time of the swap? If it had it's likely OP wouldn't be in this situation now frown




sim16v

2,177 posts

230 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
It wasn't a replacement chassis, it was an additional reference number on the restored chassis provided by the restorer, hence no trace of it on any historical records.... whistle



Back in the '90s I was the not so proud owner of an Escort RS Turbo.

It had full service history, with all old MOTs.

It also had three bloody chassis numbers on it, complete with different numbers on some of the MOTs! eek


williamp

20,380 posts

302 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
They are asking what is it? From what you've said, its not the original chassis and not the original engine. The replacement chassis has a different chassis number, hence the discrepency???

The paperwork should match the car, not the other way round so at the minute, the paperwork is wrong and so is the numberplate, as this should have been transferred to the "new" car, the one with the MGB engine.


You might like to argue along the lines of continuous histify, which is the triggers broom approach but its the new chassis with its chassis plate which is the spannef in the works

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

155 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Spinneyman said:
We have owned our 1957 MGA for 33 years. It has either been taxed or SORN. 2.5 years ago car was valued. They noted V5 had a different engine/chassis number (26 years ago car renovated. MGB engine/new chassis). They advised send V5 to DVLA to get it amended. BIG MISTAKE!
DVLA now say as chassis replaced and we can’t prove it was new (no receipts from 1991 renovation) our treasured reg. no is gone
Doesn't look like MGA chassis are available new, even now, so it's very unlikely they were in 1991. The ones Moss sell are "reconditioned" - https://www.moss-europe.co.uk/shop-by-model/mg/mga...

So if a used chassis from a different vehicle's used, then the original ID is lost.

Spinneyman said:
(Whether it would be possible to source a new chassis is a moot point, but IMO has nothing to do with the DVLA ‘rules’.)
In DVLA's opinion it definitely does... And theirs is the one that counts.

Spinneyman said:
Our views are:
a) Is it reasonable and fair to decide the chassis was not new, given there is no evidence to the contrary?
The burden of proof doesn't work that way...

Sorry - from what you've said, DVLA are in the right on this one. I take it the club and federation aren't taking your side on this, either...?

Weslake-Monza

476 posts

212 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Write to your MP and ask them to get the DVLA to do the right think rather than seek a profit by stealing your cars' reg.

aeropilot

40,526 posts

256 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Weslake-Monza said:
Write to your MP and ask them to get the DVLA to do the right think rather than seek a profit by stealing your cars' reg.
Not sure if that's a serious post ......scratchchin

Willhire89

1,461 posts

234 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Weslake-Monza said:
Write to your MP and ask them to get the DVLA to do the right think rather than seek a profit by stealing your cars' reg.
Do what right thing? - the car is no longer the one that 'owns' the reg - it has a different chassis and engine

BTW - No one technically owns a registration......and we wonder why DVLA get pissed off with old car world when st like this goes on and the entitled owners think they have a right to a 'treasured' reg and to not have it 'stolen' - laughable

In this situation would be happy that it could be registered at all

RichB

56,206 posts

313 months

Monday 1st January 2018
quotequote all
Could the OP not put his existing treasured plate on a retention certificate. Accept the new plate on the MGA and then transfer his treasured plate back to it?