Mercedes 280CE - rust bucket?

Author
Discussion

wjs1968

Original Poster:

152 posts

21 months

Tuesday 22nd April
quotequote all
I'm quite interested in this as it is in a very similar colour scheme (cream/dark green) to a 250CE I owned 30 years ago.

https://www.historics.co.uk/auction/lot/lot-128---...

It is described as being in exceptional condition - which it obviously isn't (look at the lefthand door lower seal lip for example - or what's left of it) and you can also see the respray is not exactly fabulous.

What I can't quite figure out is if the sills are really bad or whether it's simply a trick of the light and what appear to be holes in the righthand sill are actually shadows?

If so it's a shame because the interior is fantastic. Appreciate any thoughts.


Dapster

7,916 posts

193 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
That is a very early car with the single door mirror. It's certainly had some paint - the bit of the front valance tucked right underneath should be black, but it looks body coloured - but paint on a 45 year old car is hardly surprising. I'm not sure of the holes you mention but the circular holes you see are the jacking points. Such an elegant car though.

https://oudemercedesbrochures.nl/W123_Coupe_1280en...


wjs1968

Original Poster:

152 posts

21 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Dapster said:
That is a very early car with the single door mirror. It's certainly had some paint - the bit of the front valance tucked right underneath should be black, but it looks body coloured - but paint on a 45 year old car is hardly surprising. I'm not sure of the holes you mention but the circular holes you see are the jacking points. Such an elegant car though.

https://oudemercedesbrochures.nl/W123_Coupe_1280en...

no it's not the jacking points - it looks to me as if the sill where it meets the floorpan has gone

Tim_D

306 posts

165 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Sold my 280E a couple of years ago but from a quick look at the photos the rear jacking points (holes) don't look factory / correct so have probably been repaired in the past. It's hard to tell though as the photos aren't particularly close up but as you say the sill doesn't look right to me.

Check where bonnet hinges attach to body in engine bay and also boot floor and parcel shelf.

These all rust so doesn't mean it's a bad car - just depends on what you want and price etc.

spitsfire

1,059 posts

148 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
I could answer that before I looked at the pics - yes! I suspect that car will have good bits, but need replacement / repair panels in the usual places, so it's cost prohibitive to fix properly.

I love these, and have been to look at several, but was ultimately put off by hidden crustiness. Ended up buying a 107 instead (that was also rusty, but the repair costs were a bit easier to stomach as the 107 is far more glamorous).

They can look really good on top, but yet be soooo rotten underneath - The interiors are near as damnit indestructible and quite easy to replace, so are not a good barometer of underlying condition. There's a reason they were so popular as taxis!

Get an endoscope that connects to your phone and have a look inside the box sections, under the rear screen, corners of the doors, top/bottom of the front bulkhead etc. - the little bits of staining / frilly edges you can see on the inside of the bonnet and door corners will likely be nothing compared to what lies beneath.

ClaphamGT3

11,679 posts

256 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
As with all classics, you really need to see it to get a true handle on condition but that looks like a veneer car to me - shiny and good where you can immediately see it; less promising in the areas you can't.

It's hard to tell re the calls from the photos but the state of the engine bay, the door-shuts and the fuel filler recess are setting off early warning alarms for me

wjs1968

Original Poster:

152 posts

21 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Tim_D said:
Sold my 280E a couple of years ago but from a quick look at the photos the rear jacking points (holes) don't look factory / correct so have probably been repaired in the past. It's hard to tell though as the photos aren't particularly close up but as you say the sill doesn't look right to me.

Check where bonnet hinges attach to body in engine bay and also boot floor and parcel shelf.

These all rust so doesn't mean it's a bad car - just depends on what you want and price etc.
Fair point abut the jacking points - I think you're right.

Agree it doesn't make it a bad car - just trying to get a rough measure to see if I've the appetite for it...

wjs1968

Original Poster:

152 posts

21 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
spitsfire said:
I could answer that before I looked at the pics - yes! I suspect that car will have good bits, but need replacement / repair panels in the usual places, so it's cost prohibitive to fix properly.

I love these, and have been to look at several, but was ultimately put off by hidden crustiness. Ended up buying a 107 instead (that was also rusty, but the repair costs were a bit easier to stomach as the 107 is far more glamorous).

They can look really good on top, but yet be soooo rotten underneath - The interiors are near as damnit indestructible and quite easy to replace, so are not a good barometer of underlying condition. There's a reason they were so popular as taxis!

Get an endoscope that connects to your phone and have a look inside the box sections, under the rear screen, corners of the doors, top/bottom of the front bulkhead etc. - the little bits of staining / frilly edges you can see on the inside of the bonnet and door corners will likely be nothing compared to what lies beneath.
It's my previous experience of a 107 SLC that's ringing alarm bells - looked fabulous when I bought it and the owner had spent 10K rebuilding the engine (it was only a 280 but went like a rocket) however within a couple of years the sills were completely shot....

wjs1968

Original Poster:

152 posts

21 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
As with all classics, you really need to see it to get a true handle on condition but that looks like a veneer car to me - shiny and good where you can immediately see it; less promising in the areas you can't.

It's hard to tell re the calls from the photos but the state of the engine bay, the door-shuts and the fuel filler recess are setting off early warning alarms for me
agreed - I'm going t have to get my lazy @rse down to Farnborough if I'm serious...!

9xxNick

1,048 posts

227 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
There is enough rust bleeding through the paint in various areas to make me think this is hiding a lot of worse corrosion in the hollow sections - doors, sills and so on. If the current owner wasn't bothered about sorting out the obvious rust issues, what else will they have skimped on?

wjs1968

Original Poster:

152 posts

21 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
9xxNick said:
There is enough rust bleeding through the paint in various areas to make me think this is hiding a lot of worse corrosion in the hollow sections - doors, sills and so on. If the current owner wasn't bothered about sorting out the obvious rust issues, what else will they have skimped on?
indeed - just noticed that even the door mirror mounts have rust - quite impressive!


TarquinMX5

2,232 posts

93 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
From what I can see on their photos, alarm bells are ringing loudly; potentially a can of worms once looked at closely.

Jader1973

4,450 posts

213 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
You’re worried about the sills?

Bottom of the LH door looks really nasty; there appears to be rust leaching out from under the RH rear lamp (stains on the paint); bottom of the RH B pillar looks like there is rust coming through; edge of rear valance is rusty; something not right with the paint under the LH headlamp.

Looks awfully like it has had a quick blow over to tart it up for sale.

Interior is nice though.

TonyRPH

13,239 posts

181 months

Wednesday 23rd April
quotequote all
This model is notorious for scuttle rust IIRC.

It might be worth giving the scuttle area a thorough examination.


Longnose

258 posts

126 months

Thursday 24th April
quotequote all

I really liked my old 280CE. It wasn't particularly rusty but both bottom corners of the rear window were starting to bubble, and removing the glass to correct it was a task too far for me. I remember replacing the valve stem oil seals and a troublesome little fuel injection box (cold start?) on the side of the block. Otherwise a great car.

Rob 131 Sport

3,473 posts

65 months

Thursday 24th April
quotequote all
Longnose said:

I really liked my old 280CE. It wasn't particularly rusty but both bottom corners of the rear window were starting to bubble, and removing the glass to correct it was a task too far for me. I remember replacing the valve stem oil seals and a troublesome little fuel injection box (cold start?) on the side of the block. Otherwise a great car.
I would imagine in comparison with other contemporary cars they were highly rust resistant.
They were always a bit mean on equipment. I remember looking at an early 80’s 280 CE and it didn’t even have a Rev Counter.

wjs1968

Original Poster:

152 posts

21 months

Friday 25th April
quotequote all
Rob 131 Sport said:
I would imagine in comparison with other contemporary cars they were highly rust resistant.
They were always a bit mean on equipment. I remember looking at an early 80’s 280 CE and it didn’t even have a Rev Counter.
You would think so but they weren't - as per spitsfire above the 107 of that era was a nightmare in particular with regards to the bulkhead. And don't get me started on the previous generation 114/115 - my 250CE went in for a sill replacement which didn't go to plan owing to the fact that the floor they were meant to attach to turned out to be 95% glassfibre....

Dapster

7,916 posts

193 months

Friday 25th April
quotequote all
Rob 131 Sport said:
Longnose said:

I really liked my old 280CE. It wasn't particularly rusty but both bottom corners of the rear window were starting to bubble, and removing the glass to correct it was a task too far for me. I remember replacing the valve stem oil seals and a troublesome little fuel injection box (cold start?) on the side of the block. Otherwise a great car.
I would imagine in comparison with other contemporary cars they were highly rust resistant.
They were always a bit mean on equipment. I remember looking at an early 80’s 280 CE and it didn’t even have a Rev Counter.
German spec cars were especially bleak - it was a thing of wonder as a kid to stumble across a left hooker S Class in London on German plates say, with steel wheel, keep fit windows and a 4 speed manual!

paul_c123

449 posts

6 months

Friday 25th April
quotequote all
I think you can infer everything you need to know, from the fact the listing has a million pics but they've not thought to put any of the undersides.

Can you weld? Or have enough money and time, for someone else to weld? It might not be that extensive, underneath, but it will sure need some stuff doing.

Richard-390a0

2,814 posts

104 months

Friday 25th April
quotequote all
Photos usually flatter but 'kin hell that looks rough as...

Edited by Richard-390a0 on Friday 25th April 16:22