Sex Bomb?

[neil.b]

www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true

[Plotloss]

Fantastic.

Eddie should have stayed in the marines...

[neil.b]

That's the premise for a cracking film there.

Quick, someone ring Woody Allen.....

[BliarOut]

Nu Labia will be putting that in the water soon

[Buffalo]

Surely gotta be better than Bromide to lose it all together..?

[JonRB]

Reminds me of Eddie Izzard's suggestions for various extra settings that the phasers in Star Trek could have had, like a setting to make people limp, or remember they've left the oven on, or develop a sudden interest in flowers.

(Edit: Or a setting that makes people's browsers post something 8 times. )

>> Edited by JonRB on Friday 14th January 12:13

[cotty]

neil.b said:

Quick, someone ring Woody Allen.....

no I hate that guy, cant watch any of his films

[alexkp]

I'm not sure what to make of this comment in the article:


"distasteful but completely non-lethal blow"


I never realised they could be lethal....now I'm worried. Is it more dangerous to give or receive? What do they know I don't?

>> Edited by alexkp on Friday 14th January 12:39

[TheExcession]

The Pentagon said:

Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians.

You'd think the hairy skin and dragging knuckles would've given em away long before you got near enough to smell their breath.

Banana anyone?
best
Ex