No money for "racist" lifeboat service!
No money for "racist" lifeboat service!
Author
Discussion

Mon Ami Mate

Original Poster:

6,589 posts

291 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
www.thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=145176&command=displayContent&sourceNode=144906&contentPK=11723433

WE'LL KEEP THEM AFLOAT
Next Story | Previous Story | Back to list

11:00 - 27 January 2005
Sometimes it takes ordinary people to cut through the nonsense that is political correctness. And so it is with the refusal of the Awards for All lottery grants to help the Severn Area Rescue Association (SARA) because it did not rescue enough people from ethnic minorities.

It is an argument that is so breathtaking in its absurdity, so totally illogical, that it defies belief.

Yet it has taken a couple from an ethnic minority to put things right.

For like everyone else who has read this story, Bristol takeaway owners Nick and Jay Jethwa appreciate that when it comes to rescuing people, nobody, literally nobody, considers the colour of their skin or their nationality.

If we see someone in trouble we have a natural human instinct to want to help them. We have seen evidence of this in the wake of the tsunami.

Anyone with the slightest common sense knows that the members of SARA are driven by a desire to save lives, whoever those lives might be.

Mr and Mrs Jethwa not only appreciate the role of this organisation, they are embarrassed by the behaviour of the lottery grant officials.

Their offer to raise the £5,000 needed to keep SARA going is a sincere one and should make anyone who believes political correctness is a force for good think again.

It's a stifling, limiting force, it's intrusive and damaging, it smoothers humour, it breeds misunderstanding, it suffocates free speech and it makes a mockery of those who try to impose it.

Political correctness is a curse of modern times. It imposes change where none is needed, it makes issues of situations where none exist and it leaves people tongue-tied as they worry about saying the wrong thing.

It results in money being given to spurious minority groups at the expense of organisations which work for the general good of everyone.

Political correctness is divisive. Rather than help to overcome differences, it serves only to reinforce them.

It really is about time more of us challenged it. Mr and Mrs Jethwa are a kind and generous couple but it shouldn't have been left to them to redress such a glaringly wrong practice.

rich-uk

1,431 posts

279 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

256 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
Sorry we'll have to leave one of your kids behind as it'll bugger up our stats if we rescue another white one today and they'll cut our funding.

apache

39,731 posts

307 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
There was another story about a mountain rescue team who were declined because they hadn't rescued enough OAPs and Muslims, it begs the questions, how the fook would they know? and how often do you find an OAP up a mountain?

BliarOut

72,863 posts

262 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
to Nick and Jay Jethwa

This is how we move society forward. Whoever made the decision not to award the money has demonstrated sufficient lack of judgement to require the grand order of the boot

puggit

49,440 posts

271 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
SACK SOMEBODY AND SACK THEM NOW

Mon Ami Mate

Original Poster:

6,589 posts

291 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
puggit said:
SACK SOMEBODY AND SACK THEM NOW


Can I suggest we don't just sack a somebody, we sack an entire political party.

turbobloke

115,729 posts

283 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
Mon Ami Mate said:
Can I suggest we don't just sack a somebody, we sack an entire political party.

bga

8,134 posts

274 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
Disgusting if true, but I think there is more to this than meets the eye.
My dad is a volunteer cliff rescue blokey - they work very closely with the lifeboat/rescue services. They are not required to log ethnicity on their rescue reports.

mechsympathy

57,219 posts

278 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
Rude-boy said:
Sorry we'll have to leave one of your kids behind as it'll bugger up our stats if we rescue another white one today and they'll cut our funding.


Or, if you want to approach this more directly, simply chuck some people from a range of ethnic backgrounds (except obviously white anglo-saxon) into the Severn estuary and then rescue them. Funding secured

towman

14,938 posts

262 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
This is exactly why the RNLI does not seek any money from Government. And more power to them for it.

Steve

simpo two

91,189 posts

288 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
IIRC ethnic minorities don't like water much - which is why they don't need rescuing. How many do you see in the Olympic swimming final? None: But they are very good at running instead.

bga

8,134 posts

274 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
towman said:
This is exactly why the RNLI does not seek any money from Government. And more power to them for it.

Steve

It doesn't need to, it is minted + retains a good deal of autonomy.

Not the only large maritime organisation out there with charity status that is raking it in either.

Don't get me wrong, not knocking RNLI at all, they are all real heroes with balls of steel.

ferg

15,242 posts

280 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
bga said:

Don't get me wrong, not knocking RNLI at all, they are all real heroes with balls of steel.


I have two cousins who are crew on the boat serving the worst bit of sea the RNLI cover. Andrew once said to me,"When everyone else is coming in, we're going out." Balls of steel indeed.

bga

8,134 posts

274 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
ferg said:

bga said:

Don't get me wrong, not knocking RNLI at all, they are all real heroes with balls of steel.



I have two cousins who are crew on the boat serving the worst bit of sea the RNLI cover. Andrew once said to me,"When everyone else is coming in, we're going out." Balls of steel indeed.


hope they stay safe!

Bodo

12,478 posts

289 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
Mon Ami Mate said:

puggit said:
SACK SOMEBODY AND SACK THEM NOW



Can I suggest we don't just sack a somebody, we sack an entire political party.
If you're going to sack somebody, could you please take care that 5.43% of everything sacked is part of an ethical minority!? Just want to make sure nobody's left out

Balmoral Green

42,554 posts

271 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
Bodo said:
ethical minority!?
Class typo, so true

hugoagogo

23,424 posts

256 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
simpo two said:
IIRC ethnic minorities don't like water much - which is why they don't need rescuing. How many do you see in the Olympic swimming final? None: But they are very good at running instead.


well done, funniest post of the year!

wolves_wanderer

12,923 posts

260 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
bga said:
Disgusting if true, but I think there is more to this than meets the eye.
My dad is a volunteer cliff rescue blokey - they work very closely with the lifeboat/rescue services. They are not required to log ethnicity on their rescue reports.


I read about this somewhere else, I think the reason that the money was witheld was that the lifeboat group was not set up expressly to benefit a "minority" rather than them not rescuing enough. An incredibly asinine decision whichever way you look at it though.

bga

8,134 posts

274 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
wolves_wanderer said:

bga said:
Disgusting if true, but I think there is more to this than meets the eye.
My dad is a volunteer cliff rescue blokey - they work very closely with the lifeboat/rescue services. They are not required to log ethnicity on their rescue reports.



I read about this somewhere else, I think the reason that the money was witheld was that the lifeboat group was not set up expressly to benefit a "minority" rather than them not rescuing enough. An incredibly asinine decision whichever way you look at it though.

(w) anchors