Black or White?
Author
Discussion

fer

7,764 posts

303 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
If the reviews were good, and it interested me, the colour of the actors would not affect my interest.

neil.b

6,546 posts

270 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
los angeles said:

Question: Would you go to see a predominately black movie if reviews were good, or don't mind so long as the cast is mixed black and white?


Quota of black actors means nothing to me. A good film is a good film.

Unless we're talking Martin Lawrence of course.

tycho

12,127 posts

296 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
If I like the look of a film then I'll go and see it. I don't care whether the cast is black or white to be honest.

Tuna

19,930 posts

307 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
If the movie is about being black, then perhaps I would associate less with it than if it was about being a pistonhead. However, as has already been pointed out, a good movie is a good movie. Is this part of the hollywood shift to measuring the 'quality' of a film with accountants? Rather than pursuing an artistic vision, the bean counters insist we must have a child in every film so the kids can associate with them, a minority figure, an all american hero etc. etc.

You're probably going to get a more relaxed answer from the UK crowd - I get the impression we're a much more integrated society than the US. The Ali G joke 'Is it because I is black?' probably gets interpreted very differently in the US than here.

BTW, what about Will Smith films? Where do they figure?

soir

2,277 posts

262 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
so long as the film was good (reviews etc) I really couldn't give a toss if the actors where black, white, green or any other colour.

think this is a really silly question.

there are plenty of mainly 'black actor films out there, mostly low budget - but no way would it put me off watching it.

Recent film called 'hero' endorsed by quentin tarantino (excellent film by the way) 100% oriental cast - why would this put anyone off???

lazyitus

19,930 posts

289 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
soir said:
so long as the film was good (reviews etc) I really couldn't give a toss if the actors where black, white, green or any other colour.


Agreed.

soir said:
think this is a really silly question.


Odd maybe, not silly.

milfordkong

1,305 posts

255 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all

Tuna said:

BTW, what about Will Smith films? Where do they figure?


Good point, surely big Will has opening power, and i'd have thought Washington could open a movie too… Man on Fire and Training day were relatively big hits no?

I enjoy a good film if it’s a good film, Boyz in the Hood is a predominantly black film (cast and director) and I rate it very highly, despite being totally unable to relate to pretty much anything in the film: I’m white and from rural England, as opposed to being black and from south central LA! I can’t relate to hobbits and wizzards (other than having hairy feet) but I still enjoy the lord of the rings movies.

Andy

planetdave

9,921 posts

276 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
Come on L.A. - a big film budget needs to get bums on seats and a lot of the world is still racist as hell.

Re-educate the world and 'black' films will take off.

docevi1

10,430 posts

271 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
Echoing what has already been said, we go to see movies every weekend (have caught most of the big hitters over the past 2 years) and it wouldn't bother me in the slightest who the actors actually were, more on the reviews it gets both by critics & by the general public.

However, I tend to shy away from films which are on a Black culture as they tend to be stereotypical, "laugh at the silly black man" type and that (a) isn't funny and (b) something I consider to be racist (works the other way to). Take for instance BarberShop, fantastic low budget film with only Black actors, Undercover Brother is dire as it takes the mick too much...

v8thunder

27,647 posts

281 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
Will Smith, Denzil Washington and Samuel L. Jackson can definately open movies, and actors like Morgan Freeman and Jamie Foxx add massive resonance.

As said before, I couldn't give a toss what colour their skin is, it's if they can act convincingly in an interesting story that makes me want to see the film (however, I am likely to go and see something Sam Jackson has 'added' to the script in - his ad-libbing always makes film more realistic).

As has been said before, if the film's about 'being' Black of course that's going to affect the number of people who go and see it, but so's a film about being Jewish or, dare I say it, English.

v8thunder

27,647 posts

281 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
Sorry to offend anyone, but the most racist people I've ever met were black, and they also have the biggest chips on their shoulders- dunno, maybe you need to be a 'minority' to understand.


Similarly, I've found the most racist people at university to be Chinese - and they can be quite outspoken about it too, especially if they support Communism - but that doesn't affect my view of Chinese people, it just lets me know who the racists are and what they think.

love machine

7,609 posts

258 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
One black parent, one white parent=?
One black grandparent, 3....etc?

Where do you draw the line?

I think we should call them non-whites as the stigma seems to be attatching oneself to a black ancestor and then parading around like a victim. Listening to Lauren Hill rant about how white women shouldn't listen to her music, it makes me sick. So, Halle Berry is black? then I must be spanish then!

Sorry to perhaps speak in a harsh tone, racism makes me sick it shouldn't be tolerated no matter who it's from.

EmmaP

11,758 posts

262 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
I agree with the majority of the opinions voiced so far. For me, a script is of paramount importance. The visual quality is also key when enticing me to enter into the cinema. I do not consider the colour of the actor's skin when making a decision whether or not to watch a film. My choice will undoubtedly be swayed by the calibre of the actor and their previous performances.

As people have already stated, los angeles, the debate will be a somewhat different one amongst the Hollywood set. British attitudes to race are far more liberal.

One of the finest films that I have ever seen is 'City of God'. I think that I am right in saying that none of the cast were trained actors. The script was a compelling one, the cinematography was superb and the individual performances were quite remarkable.

_VTEC_

2,453 posts

268 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
Boyz in the hood was a compelling film. Don't remember there being any white actors in the cast.

I concur with most of what has been said already. Just an observation of mine: white people appear to be the least racist at my University.

Pickled Piper

6,449 posts

258 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
I really don't have an issue either way. However, I do take exception to way Notting Hill was depicted as a 100% white area in the movie of the same name.

FFS it's one of the most ethnically diverse areas in the world! You really have to ask yourself who is worse? the audience who derive a "feelgood" factor at being shown a 100% white area that doesn't exist or the film producers who pander to them.

pp

PatHeald

8,058 posts

279 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
I recently watched the Ray Charles biopic.

Can't see much scope in there for increasing the number of whiteys.

It was a smashing film, and would have been considerably the poorer if Tom Cruise had been cast as the eponymous hero.

I tend to judge each film on its merits, regardless of the name on the billboard.

I have to say that I was disappointed to be sitting in a half empty cinema during opening week, whilst there were huge queues to see the Howard Hughes film....

Incidentally, I don't remember a thread on Pistonheads extolling the virtues of the Ray Charles film, which rather surprised me.

Cheers

Pat

wedge girl

4,688 posts

262 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
Wasn't the Colour Purple headlined with Whoppy Goldberg? A very powerful piece of work I seem to recall, must go and buy a copy now, haven't seen it in yonks.

Dr Strangelove

419 posts

256 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
los angeles said:
There's a serious discussion going on in Hollywood at the moment about black or white films.

Question: Would you go to see a predominately black movie if reviews were good, or don't mind so long as the cast is mixed black and white?






What is a 'black movie'?, and what is the relevance to 'the premise' of the "serious discussion"?. (or is this another dispatch from the 'we white, it must be our fault, and because we Hollowood folk 'are the society', we'd better change the world official representative?.)





>> Edited by Dr Strangelove on Monday 14th February 20:46

peterpeter

6,438 posts

280 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
With regards to Hollywood business attitudes..

What a load of shit.

I really dont give two poos what colour a cast is, as long as its a good movie. And the more good films that come from different parts of the world than Hollywood the better.

If movie marketing analysts think that movies will only do well, if there are a certain number of whites or blacks in it, then thats pretty sad and if they are right.....then thats even more of a shame..

cymtriks

4,561 posts

268 months

Monday 14th February 2005
quotequote all
los angeles said:
It's generally recognised that by a quirk of history and talent the current top stars are all black: Will Smith, Murphy, Washington, Foxx, Freeman, Cheadle, Jackson, and perhaps Halle Berry. Yet none, according to the Hollywood power-brokers, can open a movie.


Rubbish.
Star Wars : worth squillions but most of the actors were virtually unknown when the first film came out.
Blair Witch Project : All actors complete unknowns, film now very famous and made a shed load.
The film industry appears obsessed with the idea that only a star can make a film worthwhile. Perhaps they should concentrate on the product instead of the packaging.

los angeles said:
The debate is fired for two reasons: Morgan Freeman has been nominated for an Oscar four times and never won once. He's nominated again for Million Dollar Baby.


Hey! I don't get every job that I interview for! Some of my dreams don't come true either! Perhaps I should sue someone!

los angeles said:
And a young black writer has started legal proceedings against a major studio because they moved his script from a $20 to a $35 million dollar project on the basis it was a commercial project (for a black movie) but it needed fewer black characters to ensure it made money at the box office.


Suggestion : stop making scripts for idiots?

los angeles said:
He refused to make those changes.


Good for him! See above.

los angeles said:
There is no black executive in Hollywood, so his battle is going to be tough.


If true this is a very sad statement. Morally I reckon he's already won. See above.

los angeles said:
Question: Would you go to see a predominately black movie if reviews were good, or don't mind so long as the cast is mixed black and white?


When did you last hear anyone say "I'm of to see that whites only movie due to my white superiority views"?

I honestly don't think anyone cares. One exception though. If a "black" movie was little more than a means of portraying a pointless, patronising or insulting stereotype of racial minorities I'd probably switch off before long.

Do Americans really think much about this sort of thing? It all sounds small minded, sad and a bit racist to me.