Same BA Boeing 747 blowns number 2 engine again
Same BA Boeing 747 blowns number 2 engine again
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
The Boeing 747 that flew from LAX to Heathrow last week on 3 engines, that had to divert to Manchester with low fuel has just had it's number 2 engine go again.

Full story here.

www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1987463/

Bit worrying an engine can go pop, be replaced then about a week later have to shut down the replacement engine.

mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
Easy, they'll check the chip plugs, find the missing "O" ring, top the oil up and bob's your uncle!

Mojo.

8Pack

5,182 posts

269 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
They should think themselves lucky that they started with 4 engines. Don't they cross the pond with 2 now?

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
ETOP (Extended Range Twin Engined Operations) have been quite common for over twenty years now - Boeing 757s, 767s,777s and Airbus A330s regularly fly across large expanses of oceans. Not one twin engined airliner has been lost due to engines stopping in flight.

Having said that, Lauda Air lost a 767 and all on board when one of its engines went into full reverse thrust - not a good thing to have happen at 35,000 feet and 500 mph. That accident happened over land so it was'nt technically an ETOPS flight.

Hardcore2000

788 posts

300 months

Friday 4th March 2005
quotequote all
Has anybody noticed a remarkable drop off in air accidents in the last few years whilst more and more flights are taking off every year. I think we may hae reached a turning point in air safety.

simpo two

92,660 posts

294 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Having said that, Lauda Air lost a 767 and all on board when one of its engines went into full reverse thrust - not a good thing to have happen at 35,000 feet and 500 mph.

Erk indeed. Couldn't they have shut off the engine, recovered and continued on one engine?

planetdave

9,922 posts

282 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
errrr that's why I'd like a 3 engine minimum for the Atlantic.

Working at MAN I see the BA complete engine loss jumbo every day. Scary.

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
simpo two said:

Eric Mc said:
Having said that, Lauda Air lost a 767 and all on board when one of its engines went into full reverse thrust - not a good thing to have happen at 35,000 feet and 500 mph.


Erk indeed. Couldn't they have shut off the engine, recovered and continued on one engine?


only if they knew what the problem was in time.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
Hardcore2000 said:
Has anybody noticed a remarkable drop off in air accidents in the last few years whilst more and more flights are taking off every year. I think we may hae reached a turning point in air safety.


I sincerely hope you're not afflicted with Murraywalker Syndrome.......

Hardcore2000

788 posts

300 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:

Hardcore2000 said:
Has anybody noticed a remarkable drop off in air accidents in the last few years whilst more and more flights are taking off every year. I think we may hae reached a turning point in air safety.



I sincerely hope you're not afflicted with Murraywalker Syndrome.......


me too i may be flying next week

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
Hardcore2000 said:

mybrainhurts said:


Hardcore2000 said:
Has anybody noticed a remarkable drop off in air accidents in the last few years whilst more and more flights are taking off every year. I think we may hae reached a turning point in air safety.




I sincerely hope you're not afflicted with Murraywalker Syndrome.......



me too i may be flying next week


You'd be better off travelling in an aeroplane......

8Pack

5,182 posts

269 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
Never the less, the safety record is impressive these days. Good 'ole Frank Whittle eh? Pity the yanks appreciated him more than we did.

I work with PLC's, and fly by wire worries me (even if they DO have five on board). Still: Yer' can't knock it!

w00dy

920 posts

266 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
I wouldn't worry about it - i build GE CF6 cores for one of the top overhaul sites, would need to be some serious ups to completely lose an aircraft. Engine shut downs aren't that uncommon.

about a year ago we had a bearing retaining bolt work loose and block and oil scavange pipe resulting in complete oil loss in 6 mins a few cycles after the overhaul - now that was serious.

8Pack

5,182 posts

269 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
w00dy said:
I wouldn't worry about it - i build GE CF6 cores for one of the top overhaul sites, would need to be some serious ups to completely lose an aircraft. Engine shut downs aren't that uncommon.

about a year ago we had a bearing retaining bolt work loose and block and oil scavange pipe resulting in complete oil loss in 6 mins a few cycles after the overhaul - now that was serious.


Aw! Schucks! Is that all Woody? proper little ray of sunshine you are mate!

Mr E

23,028 posts

288 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
Blimey. I very frequently fly over lots of water in a twin engined plane.

Did London - Chicago 6 days ago in a 757 (or was it a 777)?

sirtophamhat

1,072 posts

267 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:

Having said that, Lauda Air lost a 767 and all on board when one of its engines went into full reverse thrust - not a good thing to have happen at 35,000 feet and 500 mph. That accident happened over land so it was'nt technically an ETOPS flight.


When did that happen? I bet it didn't even rate a mention in the US papers.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
The accident happened in 1991 over Thailand. It nearly put Lauda Air out of business.

The engine reverse was so sudden (and at max throttle) that it probably pulled the wing off, or at least flipped the aircraft over leading to a structural break up. One wing was found 17km from the main crash site indicating that a wing did indeed come off at an early point in the break up sequence.

I'm pretty sure it received apprpriate coverage in the American pres and other media at the time. It certainly made the news over here. 223 people died so it was a big accident.

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
It was in the news as Nikki Lauder kept getting dragged in front of the cameras.

falcemob

8,248 posts

265 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
I didn't realise it was a 767. It was quite a big story at the time and well reported, unless there was another Lauda Air crash before that one that I am thinking of.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Saturday 5th March 2005
quotequote all
No, as far as I know that is the only fatal accident involving a Lauda Air aircraft. The aircraft involved was Boeing 767 OE-LAV, sister ship to OE-LAU.

I wouldn't have thought that Nikki Lauda would have gone out of his way to "drag the accident in front of the cameras". I'm pretty sure that he would have preferred NOT to have this type of publicity.
I think it was not long afterwards trha Austrian Airways took a controlling interest in Lauda Air and shortly after that ousted Lauda from the board of his own company.

>> Edited by Eric Mc on Saturday 5th March 16:36