Female criminals shouldn't go to prison...
Female criminals shouldn't go to prison...
Author
Discussion

jimothy

Original Poster:

5,151 posts

266 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4326999.stm

BBC News said:

'Fewer women' should face prison

Only women who commit serious or violent offences and are a danger to the public should be jailed, a prison reform charity has said.
Less than 10% of the 4,400 women held in English and Welsh jails would be imprisoned under such a policy, the Howard League for Penal Reform said.


It said offenders should be encouraged to change, with those making amends being given community penalties.

The number of female inmates has almost trebled from 1,580 in 1993.

A quarter of deliberate self-harm incidents in prisons involve women, even though they make up just 6% of the prison population.

They also made up 13.5% of prison suicides in 2004 - 13 out of 95.

"Women are being sent to prison in unacceptable numbers and are suffering disproportionately when they are inside," Howard League chief Frances Crook said.

"Even the government recognises that this is not a consequence of increased crime amongst women but rather greater severity by the courts."

Around half of women sentenced to prison are convicted of theft, handling, fraud or forgery, the league said.

'Safer society'

Ms Crook said: "Prison custody for women should be virtually abolished so that only those women who are convicted of serious and violent offences and who represent a continuing danger to the public should be held in custody.

"For other women offenders, community-based interventions that make amends for the wrong done and encourage women to change their lives offer the best chance of creating a safer society."

A Home Office spokesman said: "It is the responsibility of the courts to decide the appropriate sentence for any offender.

"If the offence is so serious that custody is the only appropriate punishment, then they must send the offender to prison irrespective of whether the offender is male or female. Custodial sentences are not given without proper consideration."

He added that the government was running the Women's Offending Reduction Programme to offer a "distinct response" to the "complex range of factors" behind their criminal behaviour.

These factors could include substance abuse, mental health problems, housing or childcare issues, history of abuse, poverty, lack of education or employment.

"The intention is not to give women offenders preferential treatment, but achieve equal outcomes for women by responding more appropriately to their offending behaviour and rehabilitation needs," the spokesman said.


The Howard League will present its proposals to the United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention in Bangkok, Thailand, next month.



pug406

3,636 posts

282 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
What a load of Boll*x, they want equality fine. Can't do the time then don't do the crime. Not rocket science is it.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
What complete and utter nonsense.

Is it me or are the preposterous news stories ocurring with greater frequency?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
BBC News said:

Ms Crook said


So shes a woman and a crook.

No vested interest then...

titiany

2,122 posts

261 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
bunch of ****. What makes women any different. If you're a criminal, you're a criminal.

scruffy

3,757 posts

290 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Lines have to be drawn.

Sending a single mother of two to prison for 1 month for not being able to afford her TV licence, poor form.

But then so is sending a single father of two...

Bring on the social workers..

JagLover

46,734 posts

264 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
scruffy said:
Lines have to be drawn.

Sending a single mother of two to prison for 1 month for not being able to afford her TV licence, poor form.

But then so is sending a single father of two...

Bring on the social workers..


She can afford her fags though and designer clothes for the kids.

If a woman commits a crime she should go to prison for the same amount of time as a man would.

srebbe64

13,021 posts

266 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Well I'm a career criminal who has spent many years in jail for shoplifting. The money I've raised from selling stolen goods will now go towards a sex change operation so that my time inside, when I'm next caught, will be significantl less (or not at all).

simpo two

92,660 posts

294 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Sounds like a clear case sexual discrimination to me.

OK, teach them to cook and clean, then they can get nice husbands and won't have to steal any more

rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:

scruffy said:
Lines have to be drawn.

Sending a single mother of two to prison for 1 month for not being able to afford her TV licence, poor form.

But then so is sending a single father of two...

Bring on the social workers..



She can afford her fags though and designer clothes for the kids.

If a woman commits a crime she should go to prison for the same amount of time as a man would.


Ah, but she can steal her fags and designer clobba but can't nick the TV licence

lotuslad

5,253 posts

283 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
I agree wholeheartedly; women should not go to prison. They should be sent to me for penal correctitude

scruffy

3,757 posts

290 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
My girlfriend is a 'baby snatching' social worker, I can't even be bothered to contribute anything constructive to this thread.
Apart from maybe castration.
Women deviants are generally more devicive, devious, coersive and intemperate and when cornered either become demure and obeisant or completely lose it.

Garden snips, right hand - now I am going to ask you five times...

rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
lotuslad said:
I agree wholeheartedly; women should not go to prison. They should be sent to me for penal correctitude


From what I've heard it wouldn't be a 'long' enough sentance though...

Sorry couldn't resist it.

lotuslad

5,253 posts

283 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Why you little...

Though a short, sharp shock is all they need. Not many reoffend

jimothy

Original Poster:

5,151 posts

266 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
lotuslad said:

Though a short, sharp shock is all they need. Not many reoffend


Judge said:

Now don't offend again, madam, or you'll have to sleep with him again.

lotuslad

5,253 posts

283 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
I've single-handedly slashed crime rates in Surrey! As a gesture, everyone can buy me a beer.

bruciebabe

1,126 posts

270 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
What complete and utter nonsense.

Is it me or are the preposterous news stories ocurring with greater frequency?


What do you expect with a labour government?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
High taxes, high inflation, low unemployment and a general sense of impending doom.

Not the deconstruction of common sense!

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
Damn' good idea......

I shall wear a skirt when I get round to topping that target I keep meaning to top......

JagLover

46,734 posts

264 months

Tuesday 8th March 2005
quotequote all
I think prison sentences for the attractive ones can be replaced by spankings.

I'm available if they need me to help out.