I love it when the French mess up!
I love it when the French mess up!
Author
Discussion

srebbe64

Original Poster:

13,021 posts

266 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
They're all on strike during the Olympic Committee's visit!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4335043.stm

Raify

6,556 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all


That's cheered me up no end. I think I've just experienced proper schadenfreude

Alex

9,978 posts

313 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
That is SO French.

JagLover

46,734 posts

264 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
I'm surprised they get any work done in between the strikes.

JMGS4

8,922 posts

299 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
Pity, does that mean that ChavCity daahn saarf is more likely to get it?

HarryW

16,012 posts

298 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
JMGS4 said:
Pity, does that mean that ChavCity daahn saarf is more likely to get it?

Probably not, red Ken et al have been known to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory before .

H

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
I reckon it's a ploy by the French to not waste £1B or more. Pity our lot didn't think of it.

JagLover

46,734 posts

264 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
Am I the only Londoner hoping desperately
that London doesn't get it?.

pistol pete

805 posts

292 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
BBC website said:
The unions are protesting against government plans to reform the 35-hour week


Whats one of them? Sounds like a good idea to me.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

276 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
I would prefer it if Paris did win it.

Paris is only a couple of hours away, so if you want to go see it there is no hassle.

And they get to carry the ridiculous burden of empty buildings and costs that are the legacy of a modern olympics.

By common agreement, the benchmark for the olympics in recent years has been Sydney. Yet even now, Sydney still has to deal with the cost of the event and having white elephant buildings that no-one knows what to do with.

We get steamed up over the Millenium Dome. After the Olympics, there will lots of similar projects all over the place with no apparent purpose.

Raify

6,556 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Am I the only Londoner hoping desperately
that London doesn't get it?.



I really hope we don't get it. If the people that are already here can't get around london without sitting in jams / paying £5 kengestion charges for cars they've sold 5 years ago, how on earth could we manage with thousands of spectators / athletes?

Besides, we haven't even managed to replace Wembley yet!

Perhaps we should sabotage the IOC visit like the French seem to have done! How about slapping Kengestion fines + FPN's for doing 32 in a 30 for all the councillors?

DJFish

6,016 posts

292 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Am I the only Londoner hoping desperately
that London doesn't get it?.



Yes, virtually everyone who currently pays to use a substandard transport infrastructure are really looking forward to sharing their conveyance with a load of non-farepaying europeans with air horns!

It's bad enough when the marathon is on, using the underground is like standing inside a tube of bacofoil!

eharding

14,648 posts

313 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
mrmaggit said:
I reckon it's a ploy by the French to not waste £1B or more. Pity our lot didn't think of it.


Ah, the old Father Ted / Eurovision Song Contest ploy..
..works a treat.

srebbe64

Original Poster:

13,021 posts

266 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
I don't care who gets it - just so long as it's not the French.

And if they did, we all know there would be an "Air Traffic Control" strike - so no one could go there anyway!

DanH

12,287 posts

289 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all

Call me naive, but I'm hoping we get it as that way some of the sodding tax raised in London may actually get spent on London for a change. I'm always disgusted at how crap everything is in London given that its where all the money comes from.

munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Am I the only Londoner hoping desperately
that London doesn't get it?.



I'm on your side as well. What a waste of time and effort. We're british dont you know. Were bound to fark up. (Just see the Millenium dome etc)

JagLover

46,734 posts

264 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
DanH said:

Call me naive, but I'm hoping we get it as that way some of the sodding tax raised in London may actually get spent on London for a change. I'm always disgusted at how crap everything is in London given that its where all the money comes from.


But alot of the money that will need to be spent on London will need to come from London Council tax payers.

In addition much of what will be built will be like the Millenium Dome expensive and useless white elephants.-All in all it is a high price to pay for transport improvements we could build anyway without an olympics.

tubbystu

3,846 posts

289 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
but IF London wins all the road, rail and underground improvements have to be finished on time - remember all the fuss about Athens being late...... It all got done in time (just).

London (and thus the UK) would also get a set of new specialist sports venues that we desperatley need.

This country CANNOT host major international sports events at present because we do not have the venues.

Where ouside Manchester do we have an international swimming complex (and that only got built for the Comm Games in '02)? or athletics - track or field , or rowing (which we have been quite good at..... and the Thames doesn't count because its tidal and has too many curves)

C'mon, back the bid. Stratford is one of the poorest boroughs in Europe and will greatly benefit. The A12 & A13 get sorted out, half of cross rail finally gets finished, and we end up with some serious sporting venues in which our athletes can train and compete.

London's existing sporting facilities were built for the Empire Games in 1924 (Empire Pool aka Wembley Arena, Earls Court etc). London is one of the worlds great cities and it and the countries population deserve decent world ranking sports facilities so we can hold our heads up with pride. If we have suitable places to train and compete we might actually win a few more medals/competitions.

I'll get me coat...................

968

12,439 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
I would prefer it if Paris did win it.

Paris is only a couple of hours away, so if you want to go see it there is no hassle.

And they get to carry the ridiculous burden of empty buildings and costs that are the legacy of a modern olympics.

By common agreement, the benchmark for the olympics in recent years has been Sydney. Yet even now, Sydney still has to deal with the cost of the event and having white elephant buildings that no-one knows what to do with.

We get steamed up over the Millenium Dome. After the Olympics, there will lots of similar projects all over the place with no apparent purpose.



For once I am not in agreement with you!

I hope London does get it, for a number of reasons. Not least of which is that it will spark the regeneration of a really crap part of London. I know that the Dome was a total cockup but, it had no long term benefit, whereas sports facilities, might provide a worthwhile outlet for people to use, and benefit from.

Thom

1,751 posts

276 months

Thursday 10th March 2005
quotequote all
srebbe64 said:
I don't care who gets it - just so long as it's not the French.


Same here. We can't afford both the required 600 m² for ministers and the OG