So What Is Towman Trying To Hide Here:

[b j m]

www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=167397&f=141&h=0

towman said:

anonymous said: [redacted] If you really want to know......... Kicks off on page 3 of this thread. www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?p=1&f=10&t=138752&h=0 ......

Actually, towman, it kicked off on page 1 with:

diesel ed said:

Mad Moggie said: Driver was too fast for the conditions, but girl's drunken state contributed. Surely the other way round? If the car being overtaken was going faster might not that have killed her before she got in front of the overtaking car? So is it the overtakee's fault that the overtaker killed her? What if she had fallen or jumped off a bridge so close in front of the overtaker that he would have seriously injured her at 30, but actually killed her as he was doing an alleged 60. Is the accident still the overtaker's fault "but girl's drunken state contributed"?

And:

diesel ed said:

john_p said: I think you have to expect everything when driving. Although the girl was drunk and, if I'm interpreting the article correctly, ran out in the road without looking, the guy really shouldn't have been driving like he was. Isn't that two separate issues? And isn't your first point wrong? Does he have to expect her jumping off the far side of a bridge? If he doesn't then what difference would him driving a stolen car/ being an illegal immigrant/ having escaped from jail/ suffered a heart attack and jammed his foot on the accelerator make to his guilt? You wouldn't say if he hadn't stolen the car/ illegally entered the country/ stayed in jail/ not been a fat b*st*ard he wouldn't have killed her so it's the drivers fault, would you? So why does - john_p said: I would lay the blame at the door of the car driver

So why are you trying to get people to skip the first couple of pages?

[BrianThePirate]

holy shit, give up this stupid as vendetta.

[mybrainhurts]

Heehee

Naughty lad.

[406]

BJM or should I call you Bogbrush

You are such an arse.

[tvrgit]

Ted

Can we have a facility to switch off threads and / or topics we want to ignore or block?

Ooops posted in wrong forum

[Jaglover]

tvrgit said:

Ted Can we have a facility to switch off threads and / or topics we want to ignore or block? Ooops posted in wrong forum

You want the power of God

[mrs fish]

If you all ignore him the thread will die a death....

[tvrgit]

No, I'm asking him

[BrianThePirate]

mrs fish said:

If you all ignore him the thread will die a death....

you know damn well that ignoring its no fun

[tvrgit]

mrs fish said:

If you all ignore him the thread will die a death....

Ah... the manual version... ok!

[Pies]

mrs fish said:

If you all ignore him the thread will die a death....

Pity bogbrush wont

[mrs fish]

tvrgit said:

mrs fish said: If you all ignore him the thread will die a death.... Ah... the manual version... ok!

[mrs fish]

Pies said:

mrs fish said: If you all ignore him the thread will die a death.... Pity bogbrush wont

Ooooohhh harsh

Perhaps he is just misunderstood????

[406]

Cant Ted just block his IP address?

[b j m]

tvrgit said:

Ted Can we have a facility to switch off threads and / or topics we want to ignore or block? Ooops posted in wrong forum

Yup:

Already there in the common sense plug-in to the Mark I Brain Update.

Why do Pist onheads continually follow me from thread to thread, even when it's got my name on it, and clearly gives the subject matter in the thread title.

And then complain that they don't want to read what the thread is about.

And certainly don't want to read threads by me?



EG The several attempts to restart a serious discussion about the above on drivers' responsibility.

Which Towman and his Ilk insisted on "contributing" to?

Keep it up Guys n' Gals.

Don't want to give the environMentalists the idea that you're all going to be a pushover.

I'm surprised you're not all going round puttting up 20mph signs everywhere instead of discussing speed cameras.

[-DeaDLocK-]

406 said:

Cant Ted just block his IP address?

Most IP addresses from residential properties are dynamic (including cable and ADSL connections). And even if it were static, a block would only serve to fire up these boring people even more. The best weapon is ignorance.

Bogush, don't you have friends? Or is running pointless online vendettas all you consider worthy of that existence you call a life?

[b j m]

tvrgit said:

Ted Can we have a facility to switch off threads and / or topics we want to ignore or block? Ooops posted in wrong forum

Anyway:

How do you know he doesn't pay me to start a thread everytime traffic drops?


And they have the cheek to call me all of the above:

Try looking in the mirror Guys n' Gals!

I'm not surprised you get upset when you see your reflections!

[tvrgit]

ta-ta

[b j m]

-DeaDLocK- said:

406 said: Cant Ted just block his IP address? Most IP addresses from residential properties are dynamic (including cable and ADSL connections). And even if it were static, a block would only serve to fire up these boring people even more. The best weapon is ignorance. Bogush, don't you have friends? Or is running pointless online vendettas all you consider worthy of that existence you call a life?

Actually, some of us can have a life and still find time to rattle off a few replies in between doing a myriad other things.

Unlike all these people who don't know me, have never heard of me before, have no involvement in the history of this thread, and apparently no interest in where society is going, or pistonheads for that matter.

But still have to fill their empty lives by "replying" to my posts with insults.

Errrrrrrrmmmmmmmm

So that would be you -DeaDLocK-, and your Ilk.

[-DeaDLocK-]

tvrgit said:

ta-ta

ditto