Science Question...
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
If you were (hypothetically) travelling at the speed of light, and you were to hold a mirror up in front of your face... what would you see??

Rob_F

4,153 posts

293 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
A tree making no noise whilst falling in the woods.

FunkyGibbon

3,857 posts

293 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Rob_F said:
A tree making no noise whilst falling in the woods.

whilst mimicking the sound of one hand clapping

dilbert

7,741 posts

260 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Or maybe just shrodingers cat.

esselte

14,626 posts

296 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
dilbert said:
Or maybe just shrodingers cat.


I thought that was dead?

turbobloke

117,126 posts

289 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
a red shifted zit?

JagLover

46,738 posts

264 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
If we left the room, would this thread still be here?

dilbert

7,741 posts

260 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
esselte said:

dilbert said:
Or maybe just shrodingers cat.

I thought that was dead?


Only because it was shot by an air pistol, having crapped in nextdoors garden.

esselte

14,626 posts

296 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
dilbert said:

esselte said:


dilbert said:
Or maybe just shrodingers cat.


I thought that was dead?



Only because it was shot by an air pistol, having crapped in nextdoors garden.


Ah,travelling at the speed of light merges threads together!!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
hey don't take the p**s guys, i'm serious, we've been having this discussion at work this afternoon and i can't get my head round it...

one chap says "your eyes won't work as the light won't get into them" {snigger}

another guy says you'd see a reflection of yourself as the light moving relative to you would be normal speed,

and the third guy (me) tends to thing that there would be nothing in the mirror, as at the speed of light there would be no actual reflection

who's right???

ultimasimon

9,646 posts

287 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Mac GT said:
If you were (hypothetically) travelling at the speed of light, and you were to hold a mirror up in front of your face... what would you see??



Nothing, you would be more worried about what lies ahead

esselte

14,626 posts

296 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Mac GT said:
hey don't take the p**s guys, i'm serious, we've been having this discussion at work this afternoon and i can't get my head round it...

one chap says "your eyes won't work as the light won't get into them" {snigger}

another guy says you'd see a reflection of yourself as the light moving relative to you would be normal speed,

and the third guy (me) tends to thing that there would be nothing in the mirror, as at the speed of light there would be no actual reflection

who's right???


Would there be any point putting your headlights on?

Tuna

19,930 posts

313 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
esselte said:

Ah,travelling at the speed of light merges threads together!!



Don't Cross the Threads!!!

edited to add - I think you'd see yourself - light would still 'work' for you. However, the experience would be brief as the first speck of cosmic dust you met would wipe you, the spaceship and your mirror out.

>> Edited by Tuna on Friday 8th April 17:55

brainsaw

152 posts

273 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
I reckon:
Mac GT said:


another guy says you'd see a reflection of yourself as the light moving relative to you would be normal speed,


groucho

12,134 posts

275 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
If it was me, I would see an extremely handsome fella.



>> Edited by groucho on Friday 8th April 18:23

Scruffy

3,757 posts

290 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Don't hold your breath - but an explaination will appear on this thread, I'm just having my tea.

nervous

24,050 posts

259 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
youd see yourself. the speed of light remains the same for you, its for relative bodies (not in the way that jerry lee lewis thinks of them...ooo topical reference) that the apparent speed of light changes.

as the kids say, true dat. whatever the hell that means.

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

277 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
I just googled it, loads of information, but cant be arsed to cut 'n' paste it all.

There was a very interesting site though that explained it with chocolate and a microwave oven.

vescovo

8,875 posts

311 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
nervous said:
youd see yourself. the speed of light remains the same for you, its for relative bodies (not in the way that jerry lee lewis thinks of them...ooo topical reference) that the apparent speed of light changes.

as the kids say, true dat. whatever the hell that means.


Yep, wot he said.

FunkyNige

9,813 posts

304 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
nervous said:
youd see yourself. the speed of light remains the same for you, its for relative bodies (not in the way that jerry lee lewis thinks of them...ooo topical reference) that the apparent speed of light changes.

as the kids say, true dat. whatever the hell that means.



Goddamnit, I was going to look all clever and give this answer but you just beat me to it, grr.

Aargh and to make it worse the Straight Dope archive (where the answers tto all life's questions lie) is down

Edit - Dope comes to the rescue -

www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_143.html

(it's the headlights on at the speed of light but the explanation is in there)

>> Edited by FunkyNige on Friday 8th April 18:40