Which Peterborough PHer did this
Which Peterborough PHer did this
Author
Discussion

406

Original Poster:

3,636 posts

282 months

towman

14,938 posts

268 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
If it aint you it must be Bliarout! You flatlanders - militant lot aren`t you.

MikeyT

18,335 posts

300 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
Could have been me as I go past there on the way home every night.

But it wasn't.

Tell you the truth, I hadn't noticed it had gone ...

-DeaDLocK-

3,368 posts

280 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
To be honest the camera looks to be in a 30mph limit in a built-up area - exactly where they should be.

If it was run over deliberately I'd have a good mind to have a word with the culprit.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
Twasn't me, but I wish it was

However I may or may not be guilty of altering the odd sign to more accurately reflect the purpose of the scameras


Disclaimer
I might have done it, but then again, so could any of the other enlightened residents of Peterborough. Comments in an internet forum form no basis for a prosecution... Yadda yadda yadda

deltafox

3,839 posts

261 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
-DeaDLocK- said:
To be honest the camera looks to be in a 30mph limit in a built-up area - exactly where they should be.

If it was run over deliberately I'd have a good mind to have a word with the culprit.


Dont be daft! Scameras are NEVER in the right place as theres no such place for em to be!

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
That happened to one near me recently, rammed by somebody on purpose by the look of it.

I have piccies if anyone is interested.

speedy_thrills

7,905 posts

272 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
I think I have just discovered why my mum’s Toyota Rav4 has “Nudge bars” on the front and suddenly I find myself less morally concerned for the peasants and other commoners who run in front of cars with these bars.

beano500

20,854 posts

304 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
spokesman said:
The camera had to be taken away for safety reasons
Pity they don't state that all others should be taken away for exactly the same reasons

Frik

13,677 posts

272 months

Saturday 16th April 2005
quotequote all
the article said:
Stuart Clarkson, a spokesman for Cambridgeshire police's road safety unit...
The black sheep of the Clarkson family?

Pigeon

18,535 posts

275 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
I wonder, if someone were to attach a powerful gamma source to a camera, how long it would take them to work out why all the films were fogged?

8Pack

5,182 posts

269 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
Pigeon said:
I wonder, if someone were to attach a powerful gamma source to a camera, how long it would take them to work out why all the films were fogged?



Millemiums?

superflid

2,254 posts

294 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
deltafox said:

-DeaDLocK- said:
To be honest the camera looks to be in a 30mph limit in a built-up area - exactly where they should be.

If it was run over deliberately I'd have a good mind to have a word with the culprit.



Dont be daft! Scameras are NEVER in the right place as theres no such place for em to be!




You'll realise this when a pic of a cloned car with your number on drops through your door.

Been there.

wolves_wanderer

12,952 posts

266 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
Twasn't me, but I wish it was

However I may or may not be guilty of altering the odd sign to more accurately reflect the purpose of the scameras


Disclaimer
I might have done it, but then again, so could any of the other enlightened residents of Peterborough. Comments in an internet forum form no basis for a prosecution... Yadda yadda yadda


It wouldn't now give a warning about tax cameras rather than speed cameras would it? Cheers me up every time I pass it on the way home.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
wolves_wanderer said:

BliarOut said:
Twasn't me, but I wish it was

However I may or may not be guilty of altering the odd sign to more accurately reflect the purpose of the scameras


Disclaimer
I might have done it, but then again, so could any of the other enlightened residents of Peterborough. Comments in an internet forum form no basis for a prosecution... Yadda yadda yadda



It wouldn't now give a warning about tax cameras rather than speed cameras would it? Cheers me up every time I pass it on the way home.


You mean the one a few hundred yards from my house.... I wouldn't like to say

wolves_wanderer

12,952 posts

266 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
BliarOut said:

wolves_wanderer said:


BliarOut said:
Twasn't me, but I wish it was

However I may or may not be guilty of altering the odd sign to more accurately reflect the purpose of the scameras


Disclaimer
I might have done it, but then again, so could any of the other enlightened residents of Peterborough. Comments in an internet forum form no basis for a prosecution... Yadda yadda yadda




It wouldn't now give a warning about tax cameras rather than speed cameras would it? Cheers me up every time I pass it on the way home.



You mean the one a few hundred yards from my house.... I wouldn't like to say


A nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat