Moan United.
Author
Discussion

WingChunDave

Original Poster:

2,253 posts

261 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
What is wrong with Man Utd fans? The scenes at Old Trafford last night are totaly disrespectful and aren't going to gain them anything. The best thing they can do is boycott the club, not buy season tickets and protest peacefully.

Can anyone understand their logic about getting Glazer out and buying the club back? It's not possible to raise that sort of money if you're a bunch of supporters and I can't see where anyone else is going to raise the funds needed to buy out Malcolm Glazer. The only way they're ever going to able to afford to buy the club back is if it goes bankrupt.

[quote=Mad United supporter said:]"The Glazer family are the enemies of Manchester United," said Shareholders United vice-chairman Sean Bones.

"We find them disgusting and repulsive. They may have captured the club but they only have it on a temporary basis.

"It might take a long time, maybe two or three years, but we are showing Glazer that we won't give up.

"In the long-term the Glazer brand will be suffocated. The previous Manchester United brand was peerless in terms of sporting brand names.

"The Glazer brand is toxic and tarnished, uncool and unstylish. Glazer will lose the war." [/quote]

cliffe_mafia

1,732 posts

267 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
But every other football fan loves their chairman and board, don't they?

lazyitus

19,931 posts

295 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Passion.

AlexH

2,505 posts

313 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
They're living in cloud cuckoo land and completely fail to appreciate that they don't have the numbers or money to do anything.

I have found the Not For $al£ signs very funny though; only 14 years late!

scared but happy

24,147 posts

258 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Amazing how some people can feel so strong about a .................game (yup sorry I have said it now) but on other more important issues they are nowhere to be seen. Nowt queer as folk.

WingChunDave

Original Poster:

2,253 posts

261 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
cliffe_mafia said:
But every other football fan loves their chairman and board, don't they?


I have to admit. I'm a Spurs fan and I do appreciate Daniel Levy and everything he's done and has tried to do for the club thus far.

lazyitus

19,931 posts

295 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
WingChunDave said:
I have to admit. I'm a Spurs fan and I do appreciate Daniel Levy and everything he's done and has tried to do for the club thus far.


Dave, be honest.

If this had happened at Spurs and some Yank family bought the club out and they'd never even been to London let alone White Hart Lane, would you not be bothered.

Would there not be a hardcore element of Spurs fans still remonstrating or is it just because its Man United that you're having a pop?

tycho

12,274 posts

302 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
They lost the right to complain about this when they whored the club out on the stock market to get more money and put their logo on every bit of shite they can to get the "supporters" to piss their money away.


Rob
Liverpool, Champions of Europe supporter

WingChunDave

Original Poster:

2,253 posts

261 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
lazyitus said:

WingChunDave said:
I have to admit. I'm a Spurs fan and I do appreciate Daniel Levy and everything he's done and has tried to do for the club thus far.



Dave, be honest.

If this had happened at Spurs and some Yank family bought the club out and they'd never even been to London let alone White Hart Lane, would you not be bothered.

Would there not be a hardcore element of Spurs fans still remonstrating or is it just because its Man United that you're having a pop?


If I'm honest, no. I wouldn't be happy about my club being plunged into debt. I'm not trying to have a pop because it's Man Utd, that would be too easy.

I don't agree with the way the fans went about it. If the club is floated on the stock market it's available for anyone to buy shares in. I admit the takeover was an agressive one but the club shouldn't have floated if they didn't want something like this to happen. Perhaps they just assumed they were too big for a takeover of this type?

wanty1974

3,704 posts

277 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
tycho said:
They lost the right to complain about this when they whored the club out on the stock market to get more money and put their logo on every bit of shite they can to get the "supporters" to piss their money away.


Rob
Liverpool, Champions of Europe supporter
Hear hear.

I have marched on a couple of occasions to try and get Prescott to give Brighton a new stadium and if the Board tucked us up I'd protest in every way possible. However, Man U (and most other Premiership clubs) are far too corporate now for the little fan to make a difference.

lazyitus

19,931 posts

295 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
tycho said:
They lost the right to complain about this when they whored the club out on the stock market to get more money and put their logo on every bit of shite they can to get the "supporters" to piss their money away.


Rob
Liverpool, Champions of Europe supporter



By they, surely you mean the club and not the supporters, which is what the topic is about?


Jon
Man United, Premiership winners once or twice in the last 15 years which undoubtedly gives a bit more cred when winning the European Champs League.

>> Edited by lazyitus on Thursday 30th June 09:47

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

273 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
lazyitus said:


Man United, Premiership winners once or twice in the last 15 years which undoubtedly gives a bit more cred when winning the European Champs League.


And you've won the European Cup as often as Nottingham Forest, well done you.

lazyitus

19,931 posts

295 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
And you've won the European Cup as often as Nottingham Forest, well done you.




Or should that read, 'Notts Forest have won the European Cup more times than Chelsea and Arsenal put together'?

Your argument doesn't quite work, does it?

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

273 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
lazyitus said:


Your argument doesn't quite work, does it?

No argument, simple statement of fact, as was yours, which I find equally amusing.

Jack In The Box

297 posts

259 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Hi there

I'm a Man City fan, and although I can fully understand how annoying and frustrating the situation with United must be, I can't see any plans to boycott merchandise and games having any more than a tiny impact on MUFC/Glazers overall profit

As we are all aware, the Manchester United brand is a worldwide institution (more fans in china than over here blah blah etc etc). Whatever happens, united will still sell Shirts, merchandise and tickets (record number of season tickets sold for the upcoming season).

So basically, if the real loyal fans were to stop going to matches, tickets would be more readily available to the "prawnies" who Dont care about the club with the same passion as some die-hards, and Dont care who owns the club, as long as they get a ticket to go and watch their once a season game then they'll be happy.

A quick google:

"Manchester United are the world's richest sports franchise."

"for the seventh year in succession."

"£173m of turnover, well above the £151m made by Juventus of Italy."


--And--

"Manchester United has struck a deal with Terra Lycos, the internet portal (which provides the platform for this page) to create 'online communities' from its millions of Asian supporters."

"Chinese fans will eventually be able to buy club-branded goods on the site."

"Manchester United estimates that it has more than fifty million supporters around the world."


I suppose if the reason the real fans are boycotting the club isn't soley to limit the clubs money making but just to voice their opinions then this post is somewhat irrelevant. But still...it gave me something to do for 20 minutes.

Cheers,

Jack

city to win prem 05/06?

lazyitus

19,931 posts

295 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
No argument, simple statement of fact, as was yours, which I find equally amusing.


Absolutely!

minimax

11,985 posts

285 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
lazyitus said:

Einion Yrth said:
And you've won the European Cup as often as Nottingham Forest, well done you.





Or should that read, 'Notts Forest have won the European Cup more times than Chelsea and Arsenal put together'?

Your argument doesn't quite work, does it?


ahh forest...

billb

3,198 posts

294 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:

lazyitus said:


Man United, Premiership winners once or twice in the last 15 years which undoubtedly gives a bit more cred when winning the European Champs League.



And you've won the European Cup as often as Nottingham Forest, well done you.




but with a far bigger chequebook - cant see what the fuss is your club is about money and mercahdise so you get bought out big deal thats the world you live in u'll be happy again in a year if you win something. it will never be a big as achievement as forest though as they didnt buy it

[umexceptfirstmillionpoundplayerahem]

WingChunDave

Original Poster:

2,253 posts

261 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
I have to say the thing I found most amusing was the burning of season ticket renewal forms. That showed them! They won't try to take this club over again!
If it was the burning of season tickets I'd be impressed.

An empty statium would be a fantastic way to show displeasure, but as JITB pointed out, the true fans would stay away and others would take their place.

I'm still willing to bet that the majority of those who protest the most will renew their season tickets and be watching from the stands next season.

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
I personally think M Glazer has played this very wrong.

As soon as he got the control at 75% he should be on a charm offensive. He should of met some of the fans or at the very least done an interview for the one of the news channels to put their minds at rest.

Quite simply, he should of led from the front.

The price of not leading from the front is all the discontent we see at the moment. The interview that one of his sons has done is too little too late. The damage has been done.