just a thought...
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
page 5 of the Times has a story about a pitbull terrier which must be put down becasue the owner did not fit a muzzle to the dog. the dog has not bitten anyone and the owner feels the punishement is unfair as she made the mistake not the dog which has been chipped and neuuered to compy with the dangerous dogs act.

the dog is called tyson.

does anyone else think that if the dog were not called tyson it would not be on death row?

chim_knee

12,689 posts

286 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
That's just wrong. If the reason is that the dog has "potential" to do something, surely the same should be applied to humans. All Chav's should be arrested/exterminated before they commit a crime as they probably will at some point anyway!

chim_knee

12,689 posts

286 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
dressed as Dick Whittington!

rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Ahr, The Dangerous Dogs Act, not the Tories finest hour, yet another example of tabloid law.

scorp

8,783 posts

258 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Strangely my old bull terrier was called Tyson (not the PitBull variety might i add).

I think they would have to get the dog from my cold dead hands, if i was the owner.

scared but happy

24,147 posts

258 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
chim_knee said:
That's just wrong. If the reason is that the dog has "potential" to do something, surely the same should be applied to humans. All Chav's should be arrested/exterminated before they commit a crime as they probably will at some point anyway!

Oh, yes please. Gets my vote. People are more responsable for their actions. Some of these dogs are just programmed by stupid humans.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

276 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
pablo said:
the dog has not bitten anyone


so why is the dog being destroyed.

fine the owner by all means for not making the dog wear a muzzle but destroy the dog???

all sounds a bit minority report to me.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Theres no muzzle on John Prescott yet he hasnt been put to sleep.

Theres a double standard here...

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
B17NNS said:

pablo said:
the dog has not bitten anyone



so why is the dog being destroyed.

fine the owner by all means for not making the dog wear a muzzle but destroy the dog???

all sounds a bit minority report to me.


without being an expert on said law, i can only presume it is a condition that pitbulls must wear a muzzle.

incidentally, i read an editorial in a local paper which was asking two asbos be placed on twins recently born in the area. the main story in the paper was the fact that the twins were born in teh car on the way to hospital, the editorial highlighted the fact that given the children were called "Porscha" and Tee-Jay", they should give them an ASBO now and save teh future hassle. It certainly made me smile!

WingChunDave

2,253 posts

261 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
The condition that they if they don't wear a muzzle they must die sounds more than a bit harsh to me. I agree, fine the owner, make sure she doesn't do it again and give it plenty of publicity so that all other owners of these dogs realise. Just don't kill the dog, it's not his fault.

Apache

39,731 posts

313 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
chim_knee said:
That's just wrong. If the reason is that the dog has "potential" to do something, surely the same should be applied to humans.



It is if you drive, you have the potential to kill someone if you drive above a set speed limit apparently so you are fined if caught. When you are caught you then have to prove your innocence

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

277 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
"We aint done nuffink...so you can all off!"

mrs trackside

9,299 posts

262 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
pablo said:
page 5 of the Times has a story about a pitbull terrier which must be put down becasue the owner did not fit a muzzle to the dog. the dog has not bitten anyone and the owner feels the punishement is unfair as she made the mistake not the dog which has been chipped and neuuered to compy with the dangerous dogs act.

the dog is called tyson.

does anyone else think that if the dog were not called tyson it would not be on death row?

chimknee said:

That's just wrong. If the reason is that the dog has "potential" to do something, surely the same should be applied to humans. All Chav's should be arrested/exterminated before they commit a crime as they probably will at some point anyway!


this bloke looks like a dangerous dog to me, and he's not muzzled....

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Welcome to Manchester?

anhamgrimmar

1,025 posts

260 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
just skiming the same article, and apparently the act allows for a destruction order to be made if the owner breaks the act.

the owner allowed her dog in public on three seperate occasions without a muzzle which IS in contravention of the act.

IIRC the mags' tried to save the dog, but the police said the mag's were unable to do this.

totally unfair IMHO

WingChunDave

2,253 posts

261 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
mrs trackside said:

this bloke looks like a dangerous dog to me, and he's not muzzled....



For some reason I just have the urge to hurt that person. Does anyone else feel the same?

And I don't mean Mrs Trackside!

scorp

8,783 posts

258 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
Right behind you WCDave... were's my kitchen knife...

Killer2005

20,592 posts

257 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
scorp said:
Right behind you WCDave... were's my kitchen knife...


the chav has probably already nicked it

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

273 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
watch it dave scorp's behind you and he's got a knife

Apache

39,731 posts

313 months

Thursday 30th June 2005
quotequote all
WingChunDave said:

mrs trackside said:

this bloke looks like a dangerous dog to me, and he's not muzzled....




For some reason I just have the urge to hurt that person. Does anyone else feel the same?

And I don't mean Mrs Trackside!



I find him amausing, probably addicted to drain cleaner and riddled with hepatitus, he is in a living hell. I would like to smack him in the gob with a length of two by four for some reason though