Why astrology must be total cobblers
Why astrology must be total cobblers
Author
Discussion

srebbe64

Original Poster:

13,021 posts

266 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
I wandered out to my local pub to kill some time over a pint, with my Internet gadget 'thingie'. I also bought a newspaper and out of sheer boredom I read my stars and it says this:

"You can't wait for a meeting. You will have to return to work later on, with a smile on your face. But you are so full of energy so don't burn yourself out."

Anyone who knows me will confirm that the above couldn't be more opposite! As such, I don't think I'll calling Justin's starline, to find out more.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
However, statistically there are a good number of people that that is applicable to.

Thus perpetuating the cycle of false hope for another day...

minimax

11,985 posts

285 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
srebbe64 said:
I wandered out to my local pub to kill some time over a pint, with my Internet gadget 'thingie'. I also bought a newspaper and out of sheer boredom I read my stars and it says this:

"You can't wait for a meeting. You will have to return to work later on, with a smile on your face. But you are so full of energy so don't burn yourself out."

Anyone who knows me will confirm that the above couldn't be more opposite! As such, I don't think I'll calling Justin's starline, to find out more.


shouldn't buy the sun then

neil.b

6,546 posts

276 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
I knew someone who believed in all that cobblers.

My ex.

'Nuff said.

(You been busy Mr P? I'm just burning discs!)

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
How can exactly the same thing hold true for one twelth of the population on any given day!

It's just a load of vague mumbo jumbo that fits. You can read the horrorscope for any star sign and it will still just about be right

yertis

19,711 posts

295 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
srebbe64 said:
I wandered out to my local pub to kill some time over a pint, with my Internet gadget 'thingie'. I also bought a newspaper and out of sheer boredom I read my stars and it says this:

"You can't wait for a meeting. You will have to return to work later on, with a smile on your face. But you are so full of energy so don't burn yourself out."

Anyone who knows me will confirm that the above couldn't be more opposite! As such, I don't think I'll calling Justin's starline, to find out more.


OK, let's disect that. "You can't wait for a meeting". The first thing you did when you got back was come online for a virtual meeting with your virtual friends.

"You will have to return to work later on, with a smile on your face." When you have scanned the other threads on PH, and laughed at the wit displayed therein, you will relucnatly return to work, smiling at the prose of your "friends".

"But you are so full of energy so don't burn yourself out." You drank a quantity of flammable spirits - stay away from sources of ignition.

Trust the stars...

ge2

298 posts

278 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
Jonathan Cainer said:
On Tuesday morning, for the first time ever, American scientists will fire a missile into a comet. Many people find this worrying. NASA freely confess that they do not know if they are going to create a hole the size of a house... or a football stadium. This brutal attempt to find out what the comet is made of is like examining a flower by hitting it with a hammer. There are real fears that the impact will alter the orbit of the comet. That may sound trivial... but if you're an astrologer, it's very serious. Comets are crucial celestial symbols; important hands on the cosmic clock. To move one of these out of position, even by a small amount, could be to upset a delicate balance and change our universe forever. The Americans insist it won't happen. Their missile, they insist, is merely, 'the equivalent of a mosquito running into an airliner'. Let us hope they are right.


Crikey, they might have broken the horoscopes

Ecks Ridgehead

4,285 posts

257 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
No-one actually believes horoscopes, do they? I mean really? We are in the year 2005, not 1405, after all.

__Lee__

7,520 posts

272 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
This is hillarious!.

r988

7,495 posts

258 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
There was a famous experiment done a while ago where they gave a bunch of people their star signs and said some are real and some are fake.

After a month or week or however long it waas they asked how many had come true, everyone said yes! it was exactly right, and yet they all been the exact same description for each one. never underestimate peoples gullability

alexkp

16,484 posts

273 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
It actually offends me that some people make millions out of this garbage.

I have journalist friends who actually write the astrology columns for their publications - all of it is made up - none of them have any knowledge of the "subject" or interest in it.

fallon

1,391 posts

295 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
srebbe64 said:
As such, I don't think I'll calling Justin's starline, to find out more.


I definitely wouldn't bother - allegedly he's half cut most of the time and couldn't read an atrological star chart if his life depended on it.

Kirsty - Taurus, and therefore immune to stench of bullsh*t.

beano500

20,854 posts

304 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
__Lee__ said:
This is hillarious!.

Also


satch said:
Patrick Moore ... "the gravitational pull of even jupiter on you when you are born is about the same as this apple - total mumbo jumbo"
Wow - what type of apple, I'll go and get one now and see what I can predict .... Like "a twelfth of the population won't see a doctor today!"

humpbackmaniac

1,899 posts

270 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
what gets me is they all look at the same sky and yet, two differing papers will give totally differing predictions, oh hang on i'm getting confused with the weather.

Eric Mc

125,609 posts

294 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
And why is it females who tend to take more of an interest in this nonsense?

yertis

19,711 posts

295 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
Is there not a trend among quantum physicists that, given that the whole universe is bound up together at the sub-atomic level, there might be something in this after all?

ge2

298 posts

278 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
yertis said:
Is there not a trend among quantum physicists that, given that the whole universe is bound up together at the sub-atomic level, there might be something in this after all?


Sounds quite feasable to me although I think it's a bit selfish of Mystic Meg not to give the quantum pysicists a few pointers.

I expect she's protecting her interests. Or she could be full of shit

jimothy

5,151 posts

266 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
And why is it females who tend to take more of an interest in this nonsense?


Women believe anything that they read in papers/magazines, see on TV even if it is a load of Boswellox...


:runsforcoverbeforethebarragebegins:

Eric Mc

125,609 posts

294 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
"Something in this" is rather a long way from proving that a whole industry is valid and even further from proving astrology as a scientific fact.


There is no doubt that certain aspects of our existence are irefutably bound up with "cosmic connections". We are made from matter originally formed in stars. The ability of the earth to sustain life is inextricably linked to the influence of the sun. Our lives are to a certain extent affected by the earth's changing seasons.

However, the orbit of a fairly small (on a cosmic scale) piece of rock hundreds of millions of miles away and its juxtaposition against the background stars has no effect whatsoever on whether I should ask my boss for a pay rise!


>> Edited by Eric Mc on Wednesday 6th July 17:28

yertis

19,711 posts

295 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
Small is a relative term though isn't it. Expand your mind...